Check your PMs ;>)
Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 4889
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:34 am
- Location: Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania
-
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 7:54 am
- Location: Southwest USA
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
You're wrong.
From the link Eduard gave click "More about CoreChess..." at the bottom of the site, which leads to
http://chess.ultimaiq.net/corchess.html
First sentence there is
[source code] leads toCorChess is a clone of Stockfish [source code] maintained for better performance on long time controls,
trying at least partially to fill the gap between regular tests and demands of correspondence players.
https://github.com/IIvec/Stockfish/tree/corchess
[/quote]
"And Comply They Will Or Else"...Herr Sopel Works "That Stockfish Magic on The Clones"...
[/quote]
You need to focus on Your Hacked Engine "Zahak"........The Engine That Comes From Absolutely Nowhere
"Zahak (or Zahhak or Azhi Dahak) is an evil figure in Iranian/Kurdish/Perisan mythology, evident in ancient Iranian folklore as Azhi Dahāka, the name by which he also appears in the texts of the Avesta. Legend has it, that he had two giant snakes on his shoulders and he had to feed them two human brains on daily basis"
This engine Barely works most of the Time.....Perhaps you should focus on fixing it and giving Proper credit for your "Sources"........"Nothing Comes From Nowhere"......
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:40 am
- Full name: Connor McMonigle
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
Zahak is clearly not a Stockfish clone. Your ignorance is painful.
In any case, the individual responsible for creating the CorChess Stockfish fork opted to comply with the GPL/Sopel's requests which amounted to clarifying the authors.
In any case, the individual responsible for creating the CorChess Stockfish fork opted to comply with the GPL/Sopel's requests which amounted to clarifying the authors.
-
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
He opted to comply with Sopel’s request, not the GPLv3. See the GPL FAQ regarding copyright in source files and distribution with the text of the GPL. If I wanted to modify Stockfish into BozoChess and report the author in the UCI protocol as “Bozo the Clown,” I would be complying with the terms of the GPLv3 as long as I didn’t remove the names of the authors from the copyright notice in the source files and notified anyone receiving BozoChess of their rights under the GPLv3.connor_mcmonigle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 18, 2021 12:26 am Zahak is clearly not a Stockfish clone. Your ignorance is painful.
In any case, the individual responsible for creating the CorChess Stockfish fork opted to comply with the GPL/Sopel's requests which amounted to clarifying the authors.
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".
-
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2021 1:47 am
- Full name: Amanj Sherwany
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
Thanks Connor...
And for supersharp, I don't think there is much point to argue with you, I said what I feel you can benefit from, if you decide not to understand then too bad, I cannot do much more
And for supersharp, I don't think there is much point to argue with you, I said what I feel you can benefit from, if you decide not to understand then too bad, I cannot do much more
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:40 am
- Full name: Connor McMonigle
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
Yes. That's what I meant, though perhaps my "/" was confusing. Precisely, I meant the creator opted to both comply with the GPL and cooperate by adjusting the authors. For GPL compliance, I think maybe the Corchess site was also tweaked such that a link to the Stockfish License was supplied as well, though it might have already been compliant.dkappe wrote: ↑Wed Aug 18, 2021 12:58 amHe opted to comply with Sopel’s request, not the GPLv3. See the GPL FAQ regarding copyright in source files and distribution with the text of the GPL. If I wanted to modify Stockfish into BozoChess and report the author in the UCI protocol as “Bozo the Clown,” I would be complying with the terms of the GPLv3 as long as I didn’t remove the names of the authors from the copyright notice in the source files and notified anyone receiving BozoChess of their rights under the GPLv3.connor_mcmonigle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 18, 2021 12:26 am Zahak is clearly not a Stockfish clone. Your ignorance is painful.
In any case, the individual responsible for creating the CorChess Stockfish fork opted to comply with the GPL/Sopel's requests which amounted to clarifying the authors.
-
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 7:54 am
- Location: Southwest USA
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
Yes Friends New Victims Of The Stockfish Inquisition Have Arisen....
With all This Debate and Controversy It Hit Me...."Stockfish is Not Happy Because These Clones Must Test Well Against Stockfish, Sometimes Outperforming Stockfish in The Engine Tests...Now This is Not A New Development, but one I've seen over many years..Stockfish Always Tested a bit worse than Some Of These Clones...ex SugaR..Brainlearn ..Brainfish...Asmfish...Cfish...Eman..McBrain..McCain....Raubfisch..FatFritz 2...CiChess CorChess Etc..Some of it was Due to settings....Some to Updates...Only Stockfish Development (Abrok.eu) was able to keep pace for the most part. Stockfish wants their code because they want to know why some of these "Clones" test so well against the Original.
AlexChess wrote: ↑Wed Aug 18, 2021 7:54 pm I like Fischerov very much since 0.92 release. Often it performs better than Stockfish. But it seems that now authors cannot share Fisherov 98d anymore, due to the Stockfish Team request. I hope that they will show that is only inspired by SF.
https://chessengines.blogspot.com/2021/ ... rsion.html
I kindly ask to the authors to release the source code as required by GPLv3, and I ask to do the the same to Raubfisch, AI-15, KillFish, Eman, Zeus, Spider, As-130.2 authors. Please, we need that you share your knowledge to improve Stockfish competitors and SF itself.
I'll continue to privately test all them, never sharing the binaries, only for statistical purposes.
With all This Debate and Controversy It Hit Me...."Stockfish is Not Happy Because These Clones Must Test Well Against Stockfish, Sometimes Outperforming Stockfish in The Engine Tests...Now This is Not A New Development, but one I've seen over many years..Stockfish Always Tested a bit worse than Some Of These Clones...ex SugaR..Brainlearn ..Brainfish...Asmfish...Cfish...Eman..McBrain..McCain....Raubfisch..FatFritz 2...CiChess CorChess Etc..Some of it was Due to settings....Some to Updates...Only Stockfish Development (Abrok.eu) was able to keep pace for the most part. Stockfish wants their code because they want to know why some of these "Clones" test so well against the Original.
-
- Posts: 1495
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2021 8:06 am
- Full name: Alex Morales
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
I think that Stockfish testing method could be improved (the stage 1 is too fast!) and it should include GM games at tournament time controls (computer ELO is over-estimated) and games against ALL top engines.supersharp77 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 19, 2021 2:27 am Yes Friends New Victims Of The Stockfish Inquisition Have Arisen....
AlexChess wrote: ↑Wed Aug 18, 2021 7:54 pm I like Fischerov very much since 0.92 release. Often it performs better than Stockfish. But it seems that now authors cannot share Fisherov 98d anymore, due to the Stockfish Team request. I hope that they will show that is only inspired by SF.
https://chessengines.blogspot.com/2021/ ... rsion.html
I kindly ask to the authors to release the source code as required by GPLv3, and I ask to do the the same to Raubfisch, AI-15, KillFish, Eman, Zeus, Spider, As-130.2 authors. Please, we need that you share your knowledge to improve Stockfish competitors and SF itself.
I'll continue to privately test all them, never sharing the binaries, only for statistical purposes.
With all This Debate and Controversy It Hit Me...."Stockfish is Not Happy Because These Clones Must Test Well Against Stockfish, Sometimes Outperforming Stockfish in The Engine Tests...Now This is Not A New Development, but one I've seen over many years..Stockfish Always Tested a bit worse than Some Of These Clones...ex SugaR..Brainlearn ..Brainfish...Asmfish...Cfish...Eman..McBrain..McCain....Raubfisch..FatFritz 2...CiChess CorChess Etc..Some of it was Due to settings....Some to Updates...Only Stockfish Development (Abrok.eu) was able to keep pace for the most part. Stockfish wants their code because they want to know why some of these "Clones" test so well against the Original.
Chess engines and dedicated chess computers fan since 1981 Mac mini M1 8GB-256GB, Windows 11 & Ubuntu ARM64.
ProteusSF Dev Forum TROLLS KINDERGARTEN
ProteusSF Dev Forum TROLLS KINDERGARTEN