Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 7:20 am
- Full name: Andreas Matthies
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
I will leave completely. This community is just too sick.
-
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:08 am
- Location: U.S.A
- Full name: Andrew Grant
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
Another option is to put the troll users on ignore. Cuts the posts down by a good 50%.
#WeAreAllDraude #JusticeForDraude #RememberDraude #LeptirBigUltra
"Those who can't do, clone instead" - Eduard ( A real life friend, not this forum's Eduard )
"Those who can't do, clone instead" - Eduard ( A real life friend, not this forum's Eduard )
-
- Posts: 4607
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
In my list since ever...(any random post by him pours clone love and stupidity)RubiChess wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 6:39 amTrollList += supersharp77supersharp77 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 10, 2021 9:49 pm Ok.. as I suspected......First They Attacked Fat Fritz 2......(Chessbase)......Now The Have Served Eman Chess
https://cumnor-chess-server.com/phpbb/v ... ?f=9&t=480 Who Is Stockfish's Next Victim Of the Monopoly Power? :) :wink:
TrollSignature[supersharp77] = :) :wink:
https://rwbc-chess.de
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
-
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 8:20 pm
- Full name: Boban Stanojević
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
I am certainly not a troll, I do not post often and I have no wish to provoke anybody. But I still should reiterate things I said before:
One, I see that supersharp77 does not know fully the origins of StockFish. It is a fully legit project, started by Marco Costalba and encouraged by Tord Romstad. There is nothing "fishy" (pun not intended) in its origins.
I also think that in the case of CB, SF is in his good rights ethically, although it remains to be seen how the case will end legally. I will not expand on this topic, it's complicated, and I believe that both participants have done something useful for computerchess and I hope they can find an agreement useful and satisfactory for all, e.g. a special version of SF could be developed for CB for a fee.
Nonetheless, I find that the latest campaign against "clones", and especially the reaction here at CCC is a bit hypocritical. Khalid Omar has immediately stopped distributing his engine. Everybody was aware that it was a SF derivatives, made more useful for end-users, instead of been streamlined for eng-eng competitions. Omar did not hide it, and, in general, if SF developers were not hypnotised by TCEC competitions and Elo hunting, it is something they would have done themselves, eliminating the need for the like of Shashchess, Sugar, Eman, Crystal, etc. and all this problems would probably not occur.
On the other hand, he refused to divulge his own code and, especially, ideas. I feel that SF is a stagnant project since Marco's departure, all about optimisations, without real new ideas. I think it has become a compilation of ideas found in other open source engines -- like Ethereal, Seer, Berserk, etc. Without this umbilical cord feeding SF, everything could become more difficult. I would think that it was all right -- one borrows, one has to give back, and that's the spirit of the GPL -- had the SF project been developed in the clear -- but it was almost certainly not the case after the Ippo scandal.
Without this perspective, it is difficult to understand this sudden hound on a derivative distributed for free to a handful of users, especially when his author stopped to distribute it.
One, I see that supersharp77 does not know fully the origins of StockFish. It is a fully legit project, started by Marco Costalba and encouraged by Tord Romstad. There is nothing "fishy" (pun not intended) in its origins.
I also think that in the case of CB, SF is in his good rights ethically, although it remains to be seen how the case will end legally. I will not expand on this topic, it's complicated, and I believe that both participants have done something useful for computerchess and I hope they can find an agreement useful and satisfactory for all, e.g. a special version of SF could be developed for CB for a fee.
Nonetheless, I find that the latest campaign against "clones", and especially the reaction here at CCC is a bit hypocritical. Khalid Omar has immediately stopped distributing his engine. Everybody was aware that it was a SF derivatives, made more useful for end-users, instead of been streamlined for eng-eng competitions. Omar did not hide it, and, in general, if SF developers were not hypnotised by TCEC competitions and Elo hunting, it is something they would have done themselves, eliminating the need for the like of Shashchess, Sugar, Eman, Crystal, etc. and all this problems would probably not occur.
On the other hand, he refused to divulge his own code and, especially, ideas. I feel that SF is a stagnant project since Marco's departure, all about optimisations, without real new ideas. I think it has become a compilation of ideas found in other open source engines -- like Ethereal, Seer, Berserk, etc. Without this umbilical cord feeding SF, everything could become more difficult. I would think that it was all right -- one borrows, one has to give back, and that's the spirit of the GPL -- had the SF project been developed in the clear -- but it was almost certainly not the case after the Ippo scandal.
Without this perspective, it is difficult to understand this sudden hound on a derivative distributed for free to a handful of users, especially when his author stopped to distribute it.
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:39 pm
- Full name: Tomasz Sobczyk
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
Please think twice next time before you write something so false and offensivematejst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 2:33 pm On the other hand, he refused to divulge his own code and, especially, ideas. I feel that SF is a stagnant project since Marco's departure, all about optimisations, without real new ideas. I think it has become a compilation of ideas found in other open source engines -- like Ethereal, Seer, Berserk, etc.
dangi12012 wrote:No one wants to touch anything you have posted. That proves you now have negative reputations since everyone knows already you are a forum troll.
Maybe you copied your stockfish commits from someone else too?
I will look into that.
-
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:08 am
- Location: U.S.A
- Full name: Andrew Grant
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
Stockfish is desperately in need of Marco to come back and ... idk reinvent the entire evaluation paradigm? I guess it can't happen without him :shrug: Oh well maybe someone else will do it and then it will feed back into Stockfish.Sopel wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 3:19 pmPlease think twice next time before you write something so false and offensivematejst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 2:33 pm On the other hand, he refused to divulge his own code and, especially, ideas. I feel that SF is a stagnant project since Marco's departure, all about optimisations, without real new ideas. I think it has become a compilation of ideas found in other open source engines -- like Ethereal, Seer, Berserk, etc.
His post almost reads like it was written by me, in a blatant trolling effort. Except its real?
#WeAreAllDraude #JusticeForDraude #RememberDraude #LeptirBigUltra
"Those who can't do, clone instead" - Eduard ( A real life friend, not this forum's Eduard )
"Those who can't do, clone instead" - Eduard ( A real life friend, not this forum's Eduard )
-
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:40 am
- Full name: Connor McMonigle
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
This is false.matejst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 2:33 pm ...
On the other hand, he refused to divulge his own code and, especially, ideas. I feel that SF is a stagnant project since Marco's departure, all about optimisations, without real new ideas. I think it has become a compilation of ideas found in other open source engines -- like Ethereal, Seer, Berserk, etc. Without this umbilical cord feeding SF, everything could become more difficult. I would think that it was all right -- one borrows, one has to give back, and that's the spirit of the GPL -- had the SF project been developed in the clear -- but it was almost certainly not the case after the Ippo scandal.
...
It is true that there are a number of Stockfish ideas found in Seer (most notably the counter move history heuristic) as well as in Ethereal and other open source engines. Of the handful of somewhat original search ideas found in Seer, none can be found in Stockfish. The converse is simply false.
-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2018 1:28 pm
- Full name: Heinrich Pulliter
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
Stockfish authors reminds people to not violate the GPL v3 license .That's all
-
- Posts: 1242
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 7:54 am
- Location: Southwest USA
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
The Great "Genius Of Stockfish GPL Purity Herr Sopel Now has a New Delicious Stockfish Target...Behold CORCHESS !!
"And Comply They Will Or Else"...Herr Sopel Works "That Stockfish Magic on The Clones"...Sopel wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 7:33 pmThe distribution of the executable on the previously linked site does not follow the license. Also the changes made to the program violate the license. "I have taken steps to enforce compliance."peter wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 7:27 pmYou're wrong.Sopel wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 7:17 pmIndeed, CorChess seems to be violating the license too.Eduard wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 7:04 pm By the way, I also checked CorChess EXE. There is only I. Ivec as the author. However, new Stockfish patches are constantly being released. Is Ivec the sole author?
CorChess: http://chess.ultimaiq.net/stockfish.html
From the link Eduard gave click "More about CoreChess..." at the bottom of the site, which leads to
http://chess.ultimaiq.net/corchess.html
First sentence there is
[source code] leads toCorChess is a clone of Stockfish [source code] maintained for better performance on long time controls,
trying at least partially to fill the gap between regular tests and demands of correspondence players.
https://github.com/IIvec/Stockfish/tree/corchess
-
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2021 1:47 am
- Full name: Amanj Sherwany
Re: Stockfish Attacks The Stockfish Clones...Who's Next?
Dude I educated you for free... Why still persisting on your ignorance...supersharp77 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 8:10 pm The Great "Genius Of Stockfish GPL Purity Herr Sopel Now has a New Delicious Stockfish Target...Behold CORCHESS !!
"And Comply They Will Or Else"...Herr Sopel Works "That Stockfish Magic on The Clones"...Sopel wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 7:33 pmThe distribution of the executable on the previously linked site does not follow the license. Also the changes made to the program violate the license. "I have taken steps to enforce compliance."peter wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 7:27 pmYou're wrong.Sopel wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 7:17 pmIndeed, CorChess seems to be violating the license too.Eduard wrote: ↑Wed Aug 11, 2021 7:04 pm By the way, I also checked CorChess EXE. There is only I. Ivec as the author. However, new Stockfish patches are constantly being released. Is Ivec the sole author?
CorChess: http://chess.ultimaiq.net/stockfish.html
From the link Eduard gave click "More about CoreChess..." at the bottom of the site, which leads to
http://chess.ultimaiq.net/corchess.html
First sentence there is
[source code] leads toCorChess is a clone of Stockfish [source code] maintained for better performance on long time controls,
trying at least partially to fill the gap between regular tests and demands of correspondence players.
https://github.com/IIvec/Stockfish/tree/corchess