Thanks for LC0
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 3707
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:10 pm
Re: Thanks for LC0
Is anyone actively working on a hybrid NN + AB SF? I mean it really seems like a no brainer if someone can make it happen. In TCEC it is very obvious that Lc0 outplays SF in almost every game and just plays much better chess. But SF is an incredibly mature and strong tactical engine that it has been able to put up very good resistance is quickly able to take advantage of Lc0 week tactical abilities and some poor endgame play. If SF would have the positional strength of a NN engine and combine that with its already formidable tactical ability and stable endgame play ... it would be a chess engine that would take chess to a level that is probably 20 years ahead of its time.
-
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Thanks for LC0
Ask and ye shall receive: https://github.com/killerducky/lc0/tree/leelafishM ANSARI wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 4:43 pm Is anyone actively working on a hybrid NN + AB SF? I mean it really seems like a no brainer if someone can make it happen. In TCEC it is very obvious that Lc0 outplays SF in almost every game and just plays much better chess. But SF is an incredibly mature and strong tactical engine that it has been able to put up very good resistance is quickly able to take advantage of Lc0 week tactical abilities and some poor endgame play. If SF would have the positional strength of a NN engine and combine that with its already formidable tactical ability and stable endgame play ... it would be a chess engine that would take chess to a level that is probably 20 years ahead of its time.
Also, see the discussion elsewhere on this board.
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".