benchmark new smartphones: (Old Thread)

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

User avatar
mclane
Posts: 18753
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:40 pm
Location: US of Europe, germany
Full name: Thorsten Czub

Re: Moto X and Galaxy Note 3 benchmarks ?

Post by mclane »

I see it similar, I have the ipad2 and an upgrade to 64 bit would be interesting.
What seems like a fairy tale today may be reality tomorrow.
Here we have a fairy tale of the day after tomorrow....
User avatar
Ponti
Posts: 493
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:13 am
Location: Curitiba - PR - BRAZIL

Re: Moto X and Galaxy Note 3 benchmarks ?

Post by Ponti »

n:57178 nps:524k
A. Ponti
AMD Ryzen 1800x, Windows 10.
FIDE current ratings: standard 1913, rapid 1931
User avatar
Ponti
Posts: 493
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:13 am
Location: Curitiba - PR - BRAZIL

Re: Moto X and Galaxy Note 3 benchmarks ?

Post by Ponti »

Ponti wrote:n:57178 nps:524k
Sorry, above is bench with 8 threads.

4 threads: n: 55247 nps: 581k
A. Ponti
AMD Ryzen 1800x, Windows 10.
FIDE current ratings: standard 1913, rapid 1931
Jhoravi
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 6:49 am

Re: Moto X and Galaxy Note 3 benchmarks ?

Post by Jhoravi »

Ponti wrote:
Ponti wrote:n:57178 nps:524k
Sorry, above is bench with 8 threads.

4 threads: n: 55247 nps: 581k
That result looks very Snapdragon 800 :-)
I wonder how the cortex A15 Note3 variant performs considering that Samsung announced an update that all the Eight cores of the Big.Little configuration can be enabled all together.
User avatar
mclane
Posts: 18753
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:40 pm
Location: US of Europe, germany
Full name: Thorsten Czub

Re: Moto X and Galaxy Note 3 benchmarks ?

Post by mclane »

This Looks like the qualcomm note3. Its slower than the note2 for chess.
What seems like a fairy tale today may be reality tomorrow.
Here we have a fairy tale of the day after tomorrow....
User avatar
Ponti
Posts: 493
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:13 am
Location: Curitiba - PR - BRAZIL

Re: Moto X and Galaxy Note 3 benchmarks ?

Post by Ponti »

Yeap, my Note 3 is 2.3 Ghz Quad-Core (9005).
I think version N9000 is not yet available in Brazil.

Very fast and bright, beautiful screen.
Well, it plays chess much better than me... :D

The great feature of Note 3 is the S-pen, very helpful.
Photos are awesome.

Battery life =~ 1 1/2 day, I'm not a power user.
The only game I play on the phone is chess - and not everyday.
Chessbase and Playchess look marvelous with Note's big screen.
A. Ponti
AMD Ryzen 1800x, Windows 10.
FIDE current ratings: standard 1913, rapid 1931
User avatar
Ponti
Posts: 493
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:13 am
Location: Curitiba - PR - BRAZIL

Re: Moto X and Galaxy Note 3 benchmarks ?

Post by Ponti »

Well, it is a quad 2.3 - it plays chess much better than me.

To win a game against Genius Android I had to configure Genius to instant move and no permanent brain:

[Event "Test"]
[Site "Galaxy Note 3"]
[Date "2013.10.19"]
[White "Ponti, Aloisio"]
[Black "Genius"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A20"]
[Annotator "Ponti,Aloisio"]
[PlyCount "183"]

1. c4 e5 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 c6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nf3 c5 6. O-O Nc6 7. e3 dxe3 8. Bxe3
d6 9. Nc3 Be7 10. Ng5 Ng4 11. Nge4 Nxe3 12. fxe3 f5 13. Nd5 fxe4 14. Bxe4 g6
15. h4 Bh3 16. h5 Bxf1 17. hxg6 Be2 18. g7 Rg8 19. Qxe2 Rxg7 20. Qh5+ Rf7 21.
Bxh7 Ne5 22. Bg8 Qd7 23. Rf1 Bg5 24. Bxf7+ Nxf7 25. Rxf7 Qxf7 26. Nc7+ Kf8 27.
Qxf7+ Kxf7 28. Nxa8 Bxe3+ 29. Kg2 b5 30. b3 bxc4 31. bxc4 Kf6 32. Kf3 Bd2 33.
Ke4 Ke7 34. Nc7 Kd7 35. Nd5 Ke6 36. Nf4+ Ke7 37. Kd5 Be1 38. g4 Bg3 39. Ne2 Be5
40. Nc1 Kf6 41. Nd3 Bg3 42. Kc6 Kg5 43. a4 Kxg4 44. a5 Kf3 45. a6 Ke3 46. Nxc5
dxc5 47. Kb7 Kd4 48. Kxa7 Kxc4 49. Kb7 Kd3 50. a7 c4 51. a8=Q Be5 52. Kc6 Bb2
53. Kd5 c3 54. Qa6+ Kd2 55. Ke4 Kc2 56. Qe2+ Kb3 57. Kd3 Kb4 58. Kc2 Kc5 59.
Qe4 Kd6 60. Qf5 Kc6 61. Qe5 Kd7 62. Qf6 Kc7 63. Qe6 Kb7 64. Qd6 Kc8 65. Qe7 Kb8
66. Qd7 Ba1 67. Qc6 (67. Qb5+ $1 Kc7 (67... Ka7 68. Qa5+) (67... Ka8 68. Qa5+)
(67... Kc8 68. Qa6+) 68. Qa5+) 67... Bb2 68. Kb1 Ka7 69. Qa4+ Kb6 70. Qb4+ Kc6
71. Qc4+ Kd6 72. Qd4+ Kc6 73. Qa4+ Kb6 74. Qb3+ Kc6 75. Kc2 Kc5 76. Qb8 Kd5 77.
Kd3 Kc6 78. Kc4 Kd7 79. Kd5 Ke7 80. Ke4 Kd7 81. Qb7+ Kd6 82. Qb6+ Ke7 83. Qc6
Kf7 84. Kf5 Ke7 85. Qe6+ Kd8 86. Qc6 Ke7 87. Qc7+ Kf8 88. Ke6 Kg8 89. Qf7+ Kh8
90. Kf5 c2 91. Kg6 Bg7 92. Qxg7# 1-0
A. Ponti
AMD Ryzen 1800x, Windows 10.
FIDE current ratings: standard 1913, rapid 1931
User avatar
Ponti
Posts: 493
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:13 am
Location: Curitiba - PR - BRAZIL

What about LG Optimus G Pro ?

Post by Ponti »

Specs are faster than Galaxy Note 2...
A. Ponti
AMD Ryzen 1800x, Windows 10.
FIDE current ratings: standard 1913, rapid 1931
User avatar
mclane
Posts: 18753
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:40 pm
Location: US of Europe, germany
Full name: Thorsten Czub

Re: What about LG Optimus G Pro ?

Post by mclane »

?

The note2 is better because of the Bigger cache. Note3 might be better in antutu and quadrant, but note2 is better in chess.
What seems like a fairy tale today may be reality tomorrow.
Here we have a fairy tale of the day after tomorrow....
Solrac1970
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:53 pm

Re: What about LG Optimus G Pro ?

Post by Solrac1970 »

The Note 3 absolutely pulverizes the Note 2 in every benchmark with the exception of chess apps:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7376/sams ... 3-review/4

What's so interesting is that the iPhone 5S beats the Note 3 in several benchmarks. Also, keep in mind the Samsung is known to cheat on benchmarks which makes Apple's numbers even more interesting.