It COULD happen and in this case, Carlsen was explaining it clearly during the press conference, and it seems obvious that it wasn't what he wanted should have been necesary but that he didn't have very much choice. And sometimes it could be even more forced.kgburcham wrote:do you think the draw was forced?S.Taylor wrote:Is a player meant to lose a WC match game just because he had to obey a rule to sidestep a draw by repetition which he was forced to play [but is not allowed to]?Graham Banks wrote:Short draws like this cheapen our sport.kgburcham wrote:I respect them in several ways, but they should not be allowed to quit when they choose and still get paid.
this is not their match, they are just participants.
A clause stipulating that draws cannot be agreed until after 30 moves have been played might be an idea worth considering for future matches.
do you think the three moves was forced?
kgburcham
FIDE World Chess Championship thread
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: FIDE World Chess Championship thread
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 4:17 pm
Re: FIDE World Chess Championship thread
In hindsight I see that calling you a patzer was a bit harsh, and I apologize for that. Still, even if you happened to beat me in a game how would this make your idea any better?
"he most likely is not a gamer and most likely a soft program user"
What does gamer mean in this case? A serious engine-assisted correspondence chess player? And what does a soft program user mean? A weak program user? A weak user who only uses programs? A weak user because he only uses computer-programs? The terms are a bit ambiguous.
Now about the game if you still wish to play it.
"Now your without engines comment.
This is a computer chess forum correct?
I know there are OTB players here for different reasons. '
I am here as a gamer and hardware freak. "
This means that you'd rather play with engines correct? For me it's the opposite as quite frankly I am terrible at engine-assisted games as I haven't still learned how to give suggestions to the engines effectively and therefore most of the time I am some sort of a mailman, as much as it pains me to admit.
"he most likely is not a gamer and most likely a soft program user"
What does gamer mean in this case? A serious engine-assisted correspondence chess player? And what does a soft program user mean? A weak program user? A weak user who only uses programs? A weak user because he only uses computer-programs? The terms are a bit ambiguous.
Now about the game if you still wish to play it.
"Now your without engines comment.
This is a computer chess forum correct?
I know there are OTB players here for different reasons. '
I am here as a gamer and hardware freak. "
This means that you'd rather play with engines correct? For me it's the opposite as quite frankly I am terrible at engine-assisted games as I haven't still learned how to give suggestions to the engines effectively and therefore most of the time I am some sort of a mailman, as much as it pains me to admit.
Functional programming combines the flexibility and power of abstract mathematics with the intuitive clarity of abstract mathematics.
https://github.com/mAarnos
https://github.com/mAarnos
-
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:39 pm
Re: FIDE World Chess Championship thread
Now in game 2 we see an interesting discussion in Caro-Kan.
Clearly prepared by Magnus and maybe even the first time he
plays 1.-c6 in a serious game. Anand has played this variation
before, but chose 14. Qe2 in the game from april vs Ding.
Now we see 14. 0-0-0 instead. Magnus replied with 14.-0-0
Rapid play and clearly preparation.
Clearly prepared by Magnus and maybe even the first time he
plays 1.-c6 in a serious game. Anand has played this variation
before, but chose 14. Qe2 in the game from april vs Ding.
Now we see 14. 0-0-0 instead. Magnus replied with 14.-0-0
Rapid play and clearly preparation.
-
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:39 pm
Re: FIDE World Chess Championship thread
Finishing my brunch - making some coffee and....
game over... - they have already agreed on another draw
Chesswise this match is not so interesting (at least for me)
Think I will just check out the games afterwards..
Much more interesting chess - as mentioned - to be found
in the EU Team-ch...
game over... - they have already agreed on another draw
Chesswise this match is not so interesting (at least for me)
Think I will just check out the games afterwards..
Much more interesting chess - as mentioned - to be found
in the EU Team-ch...
-
- Posts: 10948
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:21 pm
- Full name: Kai Laskos
Re: FIDE World Chess Championship thread
Little change, a small decrease for Carlsen, betters give now 72%/28%.Laskos wrote:Betters seem very rational, with only small changes: 74%/26% for Carlsen.
Simulations give 76%/24% for Carlsen.
Simulations give 74%/26% for Carlsen.
-
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:39 pm
Re: FIDE World Chess Championship thread
Wouldn't be surprised one bit if Anand wins this match...Laskos wrote:Little change, a small decrease for Carlsen, betters give now 72%/28%.Laskos wrote:Betters seem very rational, with only small changes: 74%/26% for Carlsen.
Simulations give 76%/24% for Carlsen.
Simulations give 74%/26% for Carlsen.
-
- Posts: 2949
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 12:16 pm
- Location: Bordeaux (France)
- Full name: Julien Marcel
Re: FIDE World Chess Championship thread
[pgn][Event "FWCM 2013"]
[Site "Chennai"]
[Date "2013.11.10"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Anand, Viswanathan"]
[Black "Carlsen, Magnus"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B19"]
[WhiteElo "2775"]
[BlackElo "2870"]
[PlyCount "50"]
[EventDate "2013.??.??"]
[EventCountry "IND"]
[TimeControl "40/7200:20/3600:900+30"]
1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Bf5 5. Ng3 Bg6 6. h4 h6 7. Nf3 e6 8. Ne5 Bh7 9. Bd3 Bxd3 10. Qxd3 Nd7 11. f4 Bb4+ 12. c3 Be7 13. Bd2 Ngf6 14. O-O-O O-O 15. Ne4 Nxe4 16. Qxe4 Nxe5 17. fxe5 Qd5 18. Qxd5 cxd5 19. h5 b5 20. Rh3 a5 21. Rf1 Rac8 22. Rg3 Kh7 23. Rgf3 Kg8 24. Rg3 Kh7 25. Rgf3 Kg8 1/2-1/2[/pgn]
*yawn*
[Site "Chennai"]
[Date "2013.11.10"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Anand, Viswanathan"]
[Black "Carlsen, Magnus"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B19"]
[WhiteElo "2775"]
[BlackElo "2870"]
[PlyCount "50"]
[EventDate "2013.??.??"]
[EventCountry "IND"]
[TimeControl "40/7200:20/3600:900+30"]
1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Bf5 5. Ng3 Bg6 6. h4 h6 7. Nf3 e6 8. Ne5 Bh7 9. Bd3 Bxd3 10. Qxd3 Nd7 11. f4 Bb4+ 12. c3 Be7 13. Bd2 Ngf6 14. O-O-O O-O 15. Ne4 Nxe4 16. Qxe4 Nxe5 17. fxe5 Qd5 18. Qxd5 cxd5 19. h5 b5 20. Rh3 a5 21. Rf1 Rac8 22. Rg3 Kh7 23. Rgf3 Kg8 24. Rg3 Kh7 25. Rgf3 Kg8 1/2-1/2[/pgn]
*yawn*
"The only good bug is a dead bug." (Don Dailey)
[Blog: http://tinyurl.com/predateur ] [Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/fbpredateur ] [MacEngines: http://tinyurl.com/macengines ]
[Blog: http://tinyurl.com/predateur ] [Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/fbpredateur ] [MacEngines: http://tinyurl.com/macengines ]
-
- Posts: 6052
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: FIDE World Chess Championship thread
No, Carlsen will win, but even if he does not, I would still consider him the world champion, just as I would have considered Fischer world champion back in 1972 had the match with Spassky failed to proceed.Kyodai wrote: Wouldn't be surprised one bit if Anand wins this match...
-
- Posts: 1653
- Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 5:28 pm
- Location: USA
Re: FIDE World Chess Championship thread
I respectfully disagree with you. If Carlsen does not win I do not consider him WC. He has never been a WC as Fischer was and I do agree with you that he should've been still WC but they did not treat him fairly.Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:No, Carlsen will win, but even if he does not, I would still consider him the world champion, just as I would have considered Fischer world champion back in 1972 had the match with Spassky failed to proceed.Kyodai wrote: Wouldn't be surprised one bit if Anand wins this match...
-
- Posts: 2122
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:04 pm
- Location: Madrid, Spain.
Re: FIDE World Chess Championship thread.
Hello Kai:
68.6579% + 0.3*17.4402% = 73.98996% ~ 73.99% after 1e+6 simulations. If I suppose different rating differences:
If I assume again that Carlsen has 30% of chances if the classical games end in a tie:
Of course, the supposed rating difference is not the real difference extracted from FIDE list but different tries of estimation of rating difference for this single match of 12 games, counting home preparation, etc. My goal of run several supposed rating differences is to show how quickly percentages change with small variations of supposed rating differences.
I paste here the code:
Regards from Spain.
Ajedrecista.
I modified a little my WCC simulator including white advantage (I hardcoded the value of 40 Elo) and a draw model D = 2.8*µ*(1 - µ), where µ is the expected score based in the Elo difference (that is, I suppose 70% of draws for two opponents of equal strength). Knowing that the first two games were draws, I more less obtain 74% - 26% if I assume a rating difference of 47 Elo and I give 30% of chances to Carlsen if the classical games end in a tie:Laskos wrote:Little change, a small decrease for Carlsen, betters give now 72%/28%.Laskos wrote:Betters seem very rational, with only small changes: 74%/26% for Carlsen.
Simulations give 76%/24% for Carlsen.
Simulations give 74%/26% for Carlsen.
Code: Select all
White advantage: 40.0 Elo.
Supposed rating difference: 47.0 Elo.
1000000 simulations:
Carlsen wins: 687579
Anand wins: 138019
Drawn matches: 174402
Approximated elapsed time: 6.35 seconds.
Code: Select all
White advantage: 40.0 Elo.
Supposed rating difference: 45.0 Elo.
1000000 simulations:
Carlsen wins: 675682
Anand wins: 145705
Drawn matches: 178613
Approximated elapsed time: 5.91 seconds.
-------------------------------------------
White advantage: 40.0 Elo.
Supposed rating difference: 50.0 Elo.
1000000 simulations:
Carlsen wins: 704772
Anand wins: 127024
Drawn matches: 168204
Approximated elapsed time: 6.62 seconds.
-------------------------------------------
White advantage: 40.0 Elo.
Supposed rating difference: 55.0 Elo.
1000000 simulations:
Carlsen wins: 733329
Anand wins: 109512
Drawn matches: 157159
Approximated elapsed time: 6.28 seconds.
-------------------------------------------
White advantage: 40.0 Elo.
Supposed rating difference: 60.0 Elo.
1000000 simulations:
Carlsen wins: 760165
Anand wins: 93773
Drawn matches: 146062
Approximated elapsed time: 6.48 seconds.
-------------------------------------------
White advantage: 40.0 Elo.
Supposed rating difference: 65.0 Elo.
1000000 simulations:
Carlsen wins: 786047
Anand wins: 80003
Drawn matches: 133950
Approximated elapsed time: 6.07 seconds.
-------------------------------------------
White advantage: 40.0 Elo.
Supposed rating difference: 70.0 Elo.
1000000 simulations:
Carlsen wins: 810017
Anand wins: 67381
Drawn matches: 122602
Approximated elapsed time: 6.07 seconds.
-------------------------------------------
White advantage: 40.0 Elo.
Supposed rating difference: 75.0 Elo.
1000000 simulations:
Carlsen wins: 832477
Anand wins: 56579
Drawn matches: 110944
Approximated elapsed time: 5.98 seconds.
Code: Select all
Chances for Carlsen after 1e+6 simulations each time:
Supposed rating difference: 45 Elo --> 67.5682% + 0.3*17.8613% = 72.92659% ~ 72.93%.
Supposed rating difference: 50 Elo --> 70.4772% + 0.3*16.8204% = 75.52332% ~ 75.52%.
Supposed rating difference: 55 Elo --> 73.3329% + 0.3*15.7159% = 78.04767% ~ 78.05%.
Supposed rating difference: 60 Elo --> 76.0165% + 0.3*14.6062% = 80.39836% ~ 80.40%.
Supposed rating difference: 65 Elo --> 78.6047% + 0.3*13.3950% = 82.62320% ~ 82.62%.
Supposed rating difference: 70 Elo --> 81.0017% + 0.3*12.2602% = 84.67976% ~ 84.68%.
Supposed rating difference: 75 Elo --> 83.2477% + 0.3*11.0944% = 86.57602% ~ 86.58%.
I paste here the code:
Code: Select all
program WCC_2013_simulator
implicit none
integer(1),parameter::games_per_simulation=12
integer(4),parameter::simulations=1000000
integer::i,n,half_points_Carlsen,half_points_Anand,finished,Carlsen_wins,Anand_wins,drawn_matches
real(2)::D,L,random_number_for_result,Elo_difference,t0,t1,mu,supposed_difference,Elo_white_advantage
t0=cpu_clock@()
supposed_difference=4.5d1
Elo_white_advantage=4d1
Carlsen_wins=0;Anand_wins=0;drawn_matches=0
do i=1,simulations
half_points_Carlsen=2;half_points_Anand=2 ! Games 1 and 2 were draws.
finished=0
do n=1+(half_points_Carlsen+half_points_Anand)/2,games_per_simulation/2
random_number_for_result=random@()
if ((5d-1*n) /= nint(5d-1*n)) then
Elo_difference=supposed_difference+Elo_white_advantage ! Carlsen - Anand.
else
Elo_difference=supposed_difference-Elo_white_advantage ! Anand - Carlsen.
end if
mu=1d0/(1d0+1d1**(-2.5d-3*Elo_difference))
D=2.8d0*mu*(1d0-mu) ! Maximum draw ratio = 70% for opponents of equal strength.
L=1d0/(1d0+1d1**(2.5d-3*Elo_difference))-5d-1*D ! From Carlsen's POV.
if (random_number_for_result<L) then
half_points_Anand=half_points_Anand+2
else if (random_number_for_result<L+D) then
half_points_Carlsen=half_points_Carlsen+1
half_points_Anand=half_points_Anand+1
else
half_points_Carlsen=half_points_Carlsen+2
end if
end do
do n=1+games_per_simulation/2,games_per_simulation
if (finished<1) then
random_number_for_result=random@()
if ((5d-1*n) /= nint(5d-1*n)) then
Elo_difference=supposed_difference-Elo_white_advantage ! Anand - Carlsen.
else
Elo_difference=supposed_difference+Elo_white_advantage ! Carlsen - Anand.
end if
mu=1d0/(1d0+1d1**(-2.5d-3*Elo_difference))
D=2.8d0*mu*(1d0-mu) ! Maximum draw ratio = 70% for opponents of equal strength.
L=1d0/(1d0+1d1**(2.5d-3*Elo_difference))-5d-1*D ! From Carlsen's POV.
if (random_number_for_result<L) then
half_points_Anand=half_points_Anand+2
else if (random_number_for_result<L+D) then
half_points_Carlsen=half_points_Carlsen+1
half_points_Anand=half_points_Anand+1
else
half_points_Carlsen=half_points_Carlsen+2
end if
if (half_points_Carlsen>12) then
Carlsen_wins=Carlsen_wins+1
finished=1
continue
else if ((half_points_Carlsen>11) .and. (half_points_Anand>11)) then
drawn_matches=drawn_matches+1
finished=1
continue
else if (half_points_Anand>12) then
Anand_wins=Anand_wins+1
finished=1
continue
end if
end if
end do
end do
write(*,'(A,F4.1,A)') 'White advantage: ',Elo_white_advantage,' Elo.'
write(*,'(A,F6.1,A)') 'Supposed rating difference: ',supposed_difference,' Elo.'
write(*,*)
write(*,'(I19,A)') simulations,' simulations:'
write(*,*)
write(*,'(A,I19)') 'Carlsen wins: ',Carlsen_wins
write(*,'(A,I19)') 'Anand wins: ',Anand_wins
write(*,'(A,I19)') 'Drawn matches: ',drawn_matches
write(*,*)
t1=cpu_clock@()
write(*,'(A,F7.2,A)') 'Approximated elapsed time: ',(t1-t0)/2.999d9,' seconds.' ! 2.999 GHz in my PC.
end program WCC_2013_simulator
Ajedrecista.