Are these persons incompetent ?

[GenoM]

I bet if "it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck" that it is a swimming bird for sure. May be its a guse.
And if someone was making a clone why would he make a clone of the first beta? and not of the strongest version? and why he would name his clone in such way that everyone will think that the name of the clone sounds so much close tro the original program?
Personally i think that Osipov is making fun with all of us and of Raijlich in first. I think that if Strelka is clone its not a clone of Rybka Rybka beta and Strelka play different styles, I'm wandering how can one involved in computerchess see any similarity between them.

ps:
that man nicknamed Rybkin told in his post in KasparovChess fora that he disassembled Fritz too. Why noone here suspect Strelka is a Fritz clone?

[Andrej Sidorov]

New Strelka knows bishop promotion (none of Rybka does). So you can be sure that Osipov still has fine С sources of his new version. And all defensive arguments concerning Strelka 1.0 still works for 1.8.

[Dr.Wael Deeb]

I bet if "it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck" that it is a swimming bird for sure. May be its a guse.
And if someone was making a clone why would he make a clone of the first beta? and not of the strongest version? and why he would name his clone in such way that everyone will think that the name of the clone sounds so much close tro the original program?
Personally i think that Osipov is making fun with all of us and of Raijlich in first. I think that if Strelka is clone its not a clone of Rybka Rybka beta and Strelka play different styles, I'm wandering how can one involved in computerchess see any similarity between them.

ps:
that man nicknamed Rybkin told in his post in KasparovChess fora that he disassembled Fritz too. Why noone here suspect Strelka is a Fritz clone?

Disassembled Fritz