That's a pretty low blow Michael. I wouldn't have expected that from you. RedQueen is a fine engine and is getting stronger with each release.Michael Diosi wrote:Are your products of the same high quality as your chess engine ?
Graham.
Moderator: Ras
That's a pretty low blow Michael. I wouldn't have expected that from you. RedQueen is a fine engine and is getting stronger with each release.Michael Diosi wrote:Are your products of the same high quality as your chess engine ?
I don't see the relevance. Are you trying to suggest there is anything wrong with the quality of Red Queen? If so, it would be helpful if you specified what, so it could be fixed.Michael Diosi wrote:Are your products of the same high quality as your chess engine ? Are you charging your clients while you write in this forum ?http://www.playwitharena.com
This is just your opinion, and I vehemently disagree with it. Because actng according to it would lead to _objectively_ inferior products.Michael Diosi wrote:This is the first thing one should implement in an engine are the RULES of chess.
How does it handle those?Not to talk how it handles solving mates in 1...
[d]1QqQqQq1/r6Q/Q6q/q6Q/B2q4/q6Q/k6K/1qQ1QqRb w - - 0 1
http://www.playwitharena.com
I agree this is shocking. Clearly 1. ... K4xd5 is a much better move, since black is now a King up and has an easily won end-game.Michael Diosi wrote:
This is the first thing one should implement in an engine are the RULES of chess.
Hi,UncombedCoconut wrote:OK then, the next time I'm faced with k6p/8/8/3Kk3/3Kk3/8/8/P6K b - - and need computer advice I'll avoid RedQueen. As a TalkChess user who has thought Arena looked neat, I'll apologize that somebody else has violated your copyright and hope that one day you will recover from that trauma. And, of course, I'll reconsider whether I should ever respect a native Russian speaker even though there are Russian people on earth who don't respect other people's work.
Good grief!! I'm dying to learn what you are trying to accomplish here.