MD v JL
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
Masterbaiter
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
-
Jack Lad
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Masterbaiter wrote:Rcf1
| 8 | |||||||||
| 7 | |||||||||
| 6 | |||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||
| 4 | |||||||||
| 3 | |||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||
| 1 | |||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
5r2/3bkr2/1p3p2/p2Pp3/4P1p1/1PN1P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/5R2 w - - 22 42
-
S.Taylor
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Yea come on Masterbaiter (Mr. WHAT?), you are welcome to open up any imaginitive manouver if you find a good one at the last minute, now.S.Taylor wrote:Even though i predicted it is a draw, I didn't mean it had to be a draw by repetition, and at this stage.
You can try to open up some excursions, you just have to check out that it shouldn't be a can of worms.
You might find a winning excursion or a losing one, but i doubt there is a forced winning one.
Just make sure it does not have any losing variation in it.
-
Masterbaiter
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Time to try a new tactic!
Nb1
Nb1
Looking for interesting people to chat with
-
S.Taylor
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Exciting! But I hope you didn't do a new tactic because of ME... unless you have manged to check it out in width and depth to your OWN satisfaction first.Masterbaiter wrote:Time to try a new tactic!
Nb1
-
Terry McCracken
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Nothing to do with you. Martin does what he wants.S.Taylor wrote:Exciting! But I hope you didn't do a new tactic because of ME... unless you have manged to check it out in width and depth to your OWN satisfaction first.Masterbaiter wrote:Time to try a new tactic!
Nb1
Terry McCracken
-
Jack Lad
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Masterbaiter wrote:Time to try a new tactic! Nb1
| 8 | |||||||||
| 7 | |||||||||
| 6 | |||||||||
| 5 | |||||||||
| 4 | |||||||||
| 3 | |||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||
| 1 | |||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
2r5/3bkr2/1p3p2/p2Pp3/4P1p1/1P2P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/1N3R2 w - - 24 43
-
S.Taylor
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Makes sense, because he might have suddenly been forced to draw if he made just one more shuffle.
-
S.Taylor
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Cheer up Lad! It's not over yet!Jack Lad wrote:Masterbaiter wrote:Time to try a new tactic! Nb1
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 a b c d e f g h
2r5/3bkr2/1p3p2/p2Pp3/4P1p1/1P2P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/1N3R2 w - - 24 43
-
Jack Lad
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
As soon as I think it is over I will resign but not yet.S.Taylor wrote:Cheer up Lad! It's not over yet!
