SF130118
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:36 am
Re: SF130118
It is difficult to say exactly how it will scale with regard to opposing engine strength. On the one hand, avoiding draws is more likely to pay off (as opposing engine strength decreases)... but on the other hand, you are already going to be winning most of those games anyway, so there are fewer opportunities for a given number of games for it to come into play.
-
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:47 pm
Re: SF130118
Yep, regression test showing a nice elo jump.
-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm
Re: SF130118
I am running the same test again with 230118:
http://www.inwoba.de/C20.html
You can find the full rating for 130118 here in the thread. 130118 got 81%. I am quite sure it will be more with the contempt but the interesting question is if there is a performance boost against Houdin and probably Komodo and if not if that is pushing the contenders upward ...
130118 was only 3 Elo ahead of Houdini at the end ... I am courious to see the final ORDO calculation!
Ingo
http://www.inwoba.de/C20.html
You can find the full rating for 130118 here in the thread. 130118 got 81%. I am quite sure it will be more with the contempt but the interesting question is if there is a performance boost against Houdin and probably Komodo and if not if that is pushing the contenders upward ...
130118 was only 3 Elo ahead of Houdini at the end ... I am courious to see the final ORDO calculation!
Ingo
-
- Posts: 2685
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:25 am
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Full name: Stefan Pohl
Re: SF130118
The link leads only to an empty page ?!?!
-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm
Re: SF130118
Works for me ...pohl4711 wrote:The link leads only to an empty page ?!?!
-
- Posts: 2685
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:25 am
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Full name: Stefan Pohl
Re: SF130118
Yes. Now it works.
-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm
Re: SF130118
The "old" 130118 had 56% vs Houdini and 60% vs komodo ... but that were only 220 games ... anyhow, it might look good in the rating lists but C20 might fail on a server ...
the old individual result is still online:
http://www.inwoba.de/SF.html
the old individual result is still online:
http://www.inwoba.de/SF.html
-
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:47 pm
Re: SF130118
Too soon to tell, but it seems to hurt only vs Houdini so far.
-
- Posts: 5284
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
- Full name: Vincent Lejeune
Re: SF130118
Thanks for this test !IWB wrote:I am running the same test again with 230118:
http://www.inwoba.de/C20.html
You can find the full rating for 130118 here in the thread. 130118 got 81%. I am quite sure it will be more with the contempt but the interesting question is if there is a performance boost against Houdin and probably Komodo and if not if that is pushing the contenders upward ...
130118 was only 3 Elo ahead of Houdini at the end ... I am courious to see the final ORDO calculation!
Ingo
Very nice start for C=20 ! Currently, it's around 21 points (+3%) above Houdini !
Code: Select all
Stockfish 230118 64 POPCNT C20 : 447.5 - 82.5 84.43%
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT : 2672.0 - 628.0 80.97%
Houdini 6.02 : 81.4%
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2018 1:30 am
Re: SF130118
At fishtest C=20 had shown 0 measurable regression, so it probably should not result in any meaningful regression vs houdini or komodo (also it didn't in some 1000-games samples of other testers).
Right now it scores slightly more vs houdini and slightly less vs komodo but I guess it's just a noise. But it for sure helps vs weaker engines a lot.
Right now it scores slightly more vs houdini and slightly less vs komodo but I guess it's just a noise. But it for sure helps vs weaker engines a lot.