MD v JL

Traditional chess games and chess topics in general

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by gerold »

Masterbaiter wrote:e5
That move seals it for White i think. The Knight looks to be much stronger in the end game for White.
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Terry McCracken »

gerold wrote:
Masterbaiter wrote:e5
That move seals it for White i think. The Knight looks to be much stronger in the end game for White.
It's not over but finding the best defence for Black will be hard work. Yes, the Night is stronger than the Bishop in in the ensuing endgame.

I think 26. e5! deserves an exclamation mark. The game is fully controlled by White, you might even say e5! puts Black in a zugzwang situation.
Terry McCracken
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:e5
8 
7 
6 
5 
4 
3 
2 
1 
abcdefgh

5rr1/1p1bk3/p3pp2/4P3/3P2pp/1PN1P3/1P3RPP/5RK1 b - - 0 26

Well played Martin!

25... Rhg8? was an error and I should have played Bc6 instead and although white still has the advantage I think black should be able to hold the draw with careful and precise play.
8 
7 
6 
5 
4 
3 
2 
1 
abcdefgh

5r1r/1p2k3/p1b1pp2/8/3PP1pp/1PN1P3/1P3RPP/5RK1 w - - 2 26
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

Bc6 was probably stronger but is still not the type of position you want to have to defend. Any further mistakes and it is all over.

Thanks for the games. Perhaps the McMad gambit is just a little too mad?
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:Thanks for the games. Perhaps the McMad gambit is just a little too mad?
Well it is only meant to be used for blitz play really - it is no good for serious slow play but it is still a bit of a challenge for white to prove that he can win a theoretically won position. Perhaps we could play progressive take all next - these games only last a few moves and are ideal for correspondence play.
http://www.chessvariants.org/winning.dir/takeall.html
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Terry McCracken »

Jack Lad wrote:
Masterbaiter wrote:Thanks for the games. Perhaps the McMad gambit is just a little too mad?
Well it is only meant to be used for blitz play really - it is no good for serious slow play but it is still a bit of a challenge for white to prove that he can win a theoretically won position. Perhaps we could play progressive take all next - these games only last a few moves and are ideal for correspondence play.
http://www.chessvariants.org/winning.dir/takeall.html
:roll:
Terry McCracken
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Terry McCracken wrote::roll:
:roll: :shock: :? :P :x :twisted: :?: :!: :idea: :arrow: :shock: :o :wink:
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Terry McCracken »

Jack Lad wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote::roll:
:roll: :shock: :? :P :x :twisted: :?: :!: :idea: :arrow: :shock: :o :wink:
You're an idiot.
Terry McCracken
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Terry McCracken wrote:
Jack Lad wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote::roll:
:roll: :shock: :? :P :x :twisted: :?: :!: :idea: :arrow: :shock: :o :wink:
You're an idiot.
Proclaims McDouchebag the super troll.
S.Taylor
Posts: 8514
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by S.Taylor »

Masterbaiter wrote:e5
This was the move of which I couldn't think what would be the follow-up.

Is it premature?