Let us , programers, express ourselves
Moderator: Ras
-
syzygy
- Posts: 5943
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:56 pm
Re: Let us , programers, express ourselves
Why is this forum getting spammed with non-programming threads like this one?
-
Daniel Shawul
- Posts: 4186
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:34 am
- Location: Ethiopia
Re: Let us , programers, express ourselves
programers != chess_programers
You know it, but if you admit to it, you will have nowhere to dump your c/c++ expertise on.
They let that discussion roam but not my polls about it. Crazy dictators.
You know it, but if you admit to it, you will have nowhere to dump your c/c++ expertise on.
They let that discussion roam but not my polls about it. Crazy dictators.
-
michiguel
- Posts: 6401
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:30 pm
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Re: Let us , programers, express ourselves
I told you already, it is not about polls, it is about you opening way too many complaining threads. There are two running at this point where ANYBODY could go and complain. That is one extra. Programmers can express themselves. We do not need yet another thread, whether it has a poll or not. But it seems you just wanted your way. I just deleted another one. STOP.Daniel Shawul wrote:programers != chess_programers
You know it, but if you admit to it, you will have nowhere to dump your c/c++ expertise on.
They let that discussion roam but not my polls about it. Crazy dictators.
Miguel
-
Daniel Shawul
- Posts: 4186
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:34 am
- Location: Ethiopia
Re: Let us , programers, express ourselves
Why did you delete my stackOVERFLOW thread?
I am not complaining about anything. Are any of my posts going to be deleted and locked now, even when I am not complaing. Here is my post that I quote again, and please explain why you deleted it.
I am not complaining about anything. Are any of my posts going to be deleted and locked now, even when I am not complaing. Here is my post that I quote again, and please explain why you deleted it.
Now what is wrong with the above post??? I posted something that could be useful to programers, didn't even mention anything related to other threads. Are you so blind no to see this is according to the charter?stackOVERFLOW where your programing overflow questions should be directed to.
The goals of stackOVERFLOW
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Overflow
And if any programers are itching to ask integer OVERFLOW questions, a direct link
http://stackoverflow.com/
-
michiguel
- Posts: 6401
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:30 pm
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Re: Let us , programers, express ourselves
You keep spamming the forum opening new threads. DO NOT OPEN NEW ONES to complain directly or indirectly. You do no play the fool.Daniel Shawul wrote:Why did you delete my stackOVERFLOW thread?
I am not complaining about anything. Are any of my posts going to be deleted and locked now, even when I am not complaing. Here is my post that I quote again, and please explain why you deleted it.
Now what is wrong with the above post??? I posted something that could be useful to programers, didn't even mention anything related to other threads. Are you so blind no to see this is according to the charter?StackOVERFLOW where your programing overflow questions should be directed to.
The goals of stackOVERFLOW
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Overflow
And if any programers are itching to ask integer OVERFLOW questions, a direct link
http://stackoverflow.com/
Miguel
-
Daniel Shawul
- Posts: 4186
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:34 am
- Location: Ethiopia
Re: Let us , programers, express ourselves
What is wrong with the above post, i.e. stackOVERFLOW? How am I spamming with just one chess programing thread I started (the IID thread). You locked the other one about the opinion-poll, OK I get that?. The stackOVERFLOW thread is a programing thread to those programers that may have OVERFLOW qeustions. So how am I spamming with just 2 posts? strcpy(), revisting strcpy() and then overlowing integers with 80 pages are not spam however, are they?michiguel wrote:You keep spamming the forum opening new threads. DO NOT OPEN NEW ONES.Daniel Shawul wrote:Why did you delete my stackOVERFLOW thread?
I am not complaining about anything. Are any of my posts going to be deleted and locked now, even when I am not complaing. Here is my post that I quote again, and please explain why you deleted it.
Now what is wrong with the above post??? I posted something that could be useful to programers, didn't even mention anything related to other threads. Are you so blind no to see this is according to the charter?StackOVERFLOW where your programing overflow questions should be directed to.
The goals of stackOVERFLOW
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Overflow
And if any programers are itching to ask integer OVERFLOW questions, a direct link
http://stackoverflow.com/
Miguel
-
Daniel Shawul
- Posts: 4186
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:34 am
- Location: Ethiopia
Re: Let us , programers, express ourselves
How many times do I have to say this, I am not complaining. You do not interpret my intentions for me! That is called freedom of expression. You can't assume my intentions and delete my threads.michiguel wrote:You keep spamming the forum opening new threads. DO NOT OPEN NEW ONES to complain directly or indirectly. You do no play the fool.Daniel Shawul wrote:Why did you delete my stackOVERFLOW thread?
I am not complaining about anything. Are any of my posts going to be deleted and locked now, even when I am not complaing. Here is my post that I quote again, and please explain why you deleted it.
Now what is wrong with the above post??? I posted something that could be useful to programers, didn't even mention anything related to other threads. Are you so blind no to see this is according to the charter?StackOVERFLOW where your programing overflow questions should be directed to.
The goals of stackOVERFLOW
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Overflow
And if any programers are itching to ask integer OVERFLOW questions, a direct link
http://stackoverflow.com/
Miguel
My intention is this:
I believe programmers could benefit from stackOVERFLOW forum where many OVERFLOW questions are asked and replied swiftly.
What is wrong with it ?
-
michiguel
- Posts: 6401
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:30 pm
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Re: Let us , programers, express ourselves
You keep spamming the forum opening new threads. DO NOT OPEN NEW ONES to complain directly or indirectly.Daniel Shawul wrote:How many times do I have to say this, I am not complaining. You do not interpret my intentions for me! That is called freedom of expression. You can't assume my intentions and delete my threads.michiguel wrote:You keep spamming the forum opening new threads. DO NOT OPEN NEW ONES to complain directly or indirectly. You do no play the fool.Daniel Shawul wrote:Why did you delete my stackOVERFLOW thread?
I am not complaining about anything. Are any of my posts going to be deleted and locked now, even when I am not complaing. Here is my post that I quote again, and please explain why you deleted it.
Now what is wrong with the above post??? I posted something that could be useful to programers, didn't even mention anything related to other threads. Are you so blind no to see this is according to the charter?StackOVERFLOW where your programing overflow questions should be directed to.
The goals of stackOVERFLOW
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Overflow
And if any programers are itching to ask integer OVERFLOW questions, a direct link
http://stackoverflow.com/
Miguel
My intention is this:
I believe programmers could benefit from stackOVERFLOW forum where many OVERFLOW questions are asked and replied swiftly.
What is wrong with it ?
Miguel
-
Daniel Shawul
- Posts: 4186
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:34 am
- Location: Ethiopia
Re: Let us , programers, express ourselves
You repeat that until you belive it. I am not SPAMING anyone. I will post my stackOVERFLOW thread again because I belive programers could benefit from it.michiguel wrote:You keep spamming the forum opening new threads. DO NOT OPEN NEW ONES to complain directly or indirectly.Daniel Shawul wrote:How many times do I have to say this, I am not complaining. You do not interpret my intentions for me! That is called freedom of expression. You can't assume my intentions and delete my threads.michiguel wrote:You keep spamming the forum opening new threads. DO NOT OPEN NEW ONES to complain directly or indirectly. You do no play the fool.Daniel Shawul wrote:Why did you delete my stackOVERFLOW thread?
I am not complaining about anything. Are any of my posts going to be deleted and locked now, even when I am not complaing. Here is my post that I quote again, and please explain why you deleted it.
Now what is wrong with the above post??? I posted something that could be useful to programers, didn't even mention anything related to other threads. Are you so blind no to see this is according to the charter?StackOVERFLOW where your programing overflow questions should be directed to.
The goals of stackOVERFLOW
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Overflow
And if any programers are itching to ask integer OVERFLOW questions, a direct link
http://stackoverflow.com/
Miguel
My intention is this:
I believe programmers could benefit from stackOVERFLOW forum where many OVERFLOW questions are asked and replied swiftly.
What is wrong with it ?
Miguel
-
michiguel
- Posts: 6401
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:30 pm
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Re: Let us , programers, express ourselves
You posted here, but you can also posted it in the concerned threads. There are more than one you can choose to do that, but you insist in having a whole new thread about it. There are two mods at this time trying to keep up deleting your new threads. If we see one more, do not be surprised to have problems accessing the forum for 24 hrs.Daniel Shawul wrote:You repeat that until you belive it. I am not SPAMING anyone. I will post my stackOVERFLOW thread again because I belive programers could benefit from it.michiguel wrote:You keep spamming the forum opening new threads. DO NOT OPEN NEW ONES to complain directly or indirectly.Daniel Shawul wrote:How many times do I have to say this, I am not complaining. You do not interpret my intentions for me! That is called freedom of expression. You can't assume my intentions and delete my threads.michiguel wrote:You keep spamming the forum opening new threads. DO NOT OPEN NEW ONES to complain directly or indirectly. You do no play the fool.Daniel Shawul wrote:Why did you delete my stackOVERFLOW thread?
I am not complaining about anything. Are any of my posts going to be deleted and locked now, even when I am not complaing. Here is my post that I quote again, and please explain why you deleted it.
Now what is wrong with the above post??? I posted something that could be useful to programers, didn't even mention anything related to other threads. Are you so blind no to see this is according to the charter?StackOVERFLOW where your programing overflow questions should be directed to.
The goals of stackOVERFLOW
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Overflow
And if any programers are itching to ask integer OVERFLOW questions, a direct link
http://stackoverflow.com/
Miguel
My intention is this:
I believe programmers could benefit from stackOVERFLOW forum where many OVERFLOW questions are asked and replied swiftly.
What is wrong with it ?
Miguel
Miguel