Ferdy wrote:Sample run from ccrl and cegt games, added diff elo, win % and w-l-d data. I am checking randomly the W-L-D, will be released couple of hours later if I can't find any errors.
Did you change something in the draw calculation ? I made a run on CCRL 40/40 ( http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/r ... t_all.html ) and I got a number exactly the half with your new app :
CCRL : 43.0%
1 Houdini 2.0c 64-bit 4CPU 3305.36 0.00 28.01 27.61 407 64.74% 3210.31 21.50% 43.24% 176-56-175
Ferdy wrote:Sample run from ccrl and cegt games, added diff elo, win % and w-l-d data. I am checking randomly the W-L-D, will be released couple of hours later if I can't find any errors.
Did you change something in the draw calculation ? I made a run on CCRL 40/40 ( http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/r ... t_all.html ) and I got a number exactly the half with your new app :
CCRL : 43.0%
1 Houdini 2.0c 64-bit 4CPU 3305.36 0.00 28.01 27.61 407 64.74% 3210.31 21.50% 43.24% 176-56-175
You were right, I changed it to (draw_count/2) / Games. I thought this is a draw score percentage, so this is a draw count percentage.
I will prepare the fix.
If you want to spend more time, I remember I discussed about a bug when doing "exactdist" on too large spread between strongest and weakest engines (that happend with my very long list, difference is higher than 2500 Elo) ... Rémi told me he used a maximum difference (I don't remember how much). Is it possible to rise this amount to 9000 Elo ? I'll look in my mails tonight to see the current max amount.
Ferdy wrote:Just uploaded v0057.2, seems to be working now .
If you want to spend more time, I remember I discussed about a bug when doing "exactdist" on too large spread between strongest and weakest engines (that happend with my very long list, difference is higher than 2500 Elo) ... Rémi told me he used a maximum difference (I don't remember how much). Is it possible to rise this amount to 9000 Elo ? I'll look in my mails tonight to see the current max amount.
Ferdy wrote:Just uploaded v0057.2, seems to be working now .
Le 2/11/2009 19:25, Rémi Coulom a écrit :
> OK, merci. J'ai compris le bug. Le problème est dans "exactdist": je ne pensais pas que le niveau des plus faibles pourrait descendre en-dessous de -1500 (avant ajustement par la commande offset).
So, Ferdy, could you change this [-1500, +1500] to [-4500,+4500], please ?
I saw this value in the code ...
If you want to spend more time, I remember I discussed about a bug when doing "exactdist" on too large spread between strongest and weakest engines (that happend with my very long list, difference is higher than 2500 Elo) ... Rémi told me he used a maximum difference (I don't remember how much). Is it possible to rise this amount to 9000 Elo ? I'll look in my mails tonight to see the current max amount.
Ferdy wrote:Just uploaded v0057.2, seems to be working now .
Le 2/11/2009 19:25, Rémi Coulom a écrit :
> OK, merci. J'ai compris le bug. Le problème est dans "exactdist": je ne pensais pas que le niveau des plus faibles pourrait descendre en-dessous de -1500 (avant ajustement par la commande offset).
So, Ferdy, could you change this [-1500, +1500] to [-4500,+4500], please ?
I saw this value in the code ...
Is this what you mean? Found in CEloRatingCUI.cpp.
If you want to spend more time, I remember I discussed about a bug when doing "exactdist" on too large spread between strongest and weakest engines (that happend with my very long list, difference is higher than 2500 Elo) ... Rémi told me he used a maximum difference (I don't remember how much). Is it possible to rise this amount to 9000 Elo ? I'll look in my mails tonight to see the current max amount.
Ferdy wrote:Just uploaded v0057.2, seems to be working now .
Le 2/11/2009 19:25, Rémi Coulom a écrit :
> OK, merci. J'ai compris le bug. Le problème est dans "exactdist": je ne pensais pas que le niveau des plus faibles pourrait descendre en-dessous de -1500 (avant ajustement par la commande offset).
So, Ferdy, could you change this [-1500, +1500] to [-4500,+4500], please ?
I saw this value in the code ...
Is this what you mean? Found in CEloRatingCUI.cpp.
Ferdy wrote:From my sample run. Check out the + / - columns. Just tell me if I will upload the new version.
...
I think it's strange 1st line change so clearly +30.57;-30.03 become +31.49;-31.58.
As I don't know the very technical details, I ask the question to Rémi by mail ... I hope a fast response.