IanO wrote:You also need to export a particular environment variable, to use the legacy linker format:Tord Romstad wrote:Thanks for the OS X binary, Allard! I wish more of the closed-source guys would release OS X binaries, and I look forward to testing Spark some time soon.
Worth a try, but it didn't do the trick for Stockfish. I still haven't been able to compile a binary compatible with 10.5.zullil wrote:Perhaps Allard needs to recompile with
Code: Select all
$CFLAGS = -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk -mmacosx-version-min=10.5
By the way, I am very surprised that so many people are still using 10.5. I thought everybody would have upgraded by now. Snow Leopard is awesome, and the upgrade from Leopard is ridiculously cheap.
export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET="10.5"
Ian
Spark 0.4 for Mac OSX released
Moderator: Ras
-
Allard Siemelink
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:30 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Spark 0.4 for Mac OSX released
Too late...
yesterday evening after searching the net I built a new version without the export and I do not have access to a Mac atm.
-
Allard Siemelink
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:30 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Spark 0.4 for Mac OSX released
I have currently no plans to release it, maybe later.Marek Soszynski wrote:What about Spark 0.5, which is already being tested by CCRL - when will that be on general release?
-
zullil
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
- Location: PA USA
- Full name: Louis Zulli
Re: Spark 0.4 for Mac OSX released
The new binary works for me under both 10.5.8 and 10.6.4. Thanks again.Allard Siemelink wrote:Thanks, I've uploaded a new version, could you try if it is ok now?
http://members.ziggo.nl/allard.siemelink/spark/
-
Max
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:41 am
Re: Spark 0.4 for Mac OSX released
The new version runs well on my Macbook and OS X 10.5.8 now. Thanks Allard!Allard Siemelink wrote:Thanks, I've uploaded a new version, could you try if it is ok now?
http://members.ziggo.nl/allard.siemelink/spark/
I know Tord .. bought and installed the update Snow Leo DVD the day it was released. But a specific hardware I need is not supported .. so still "prisoned" in my old Leo.Tord Romstad wrote:By the way, I am very surprised that so many people are still using 10.5. I thought everybody would have upgraded by now. Snow Leopard is awesome, and the upgrade from Leopard is ridiculously cheap.
Thank you very much,
Max
-
Allard Siemelink
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:30 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Spark 0.4 for Mac OSX released
Did you also add '-mmacosx-version-min=10.5' to the linker flags?Tord Romstad wrote:Worth a try, but it didn't do the trick for Stockfish. I still haven't been able to compile a binary compatible with 10.5.zullil wrote:Perhaps Allard needs to recompile with
Code: Select all
$CFLAGS = -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk -mmacosx-version-min=10.5
-
zullil
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
- Location: PA USA
- Full name: Louis Zulli
Re: Spark 0.4 for Mac OSX released
No, I didn't, and my binary didn't work on 10.5.8. I assume that's the step I missed. Maybe Tord missed it too?Allard Siemelink wrote:Did you also add '-mmacosx-version-min=10.5' to the linker flags?Tord Romstad wrote:Worth a try, but it didn't do the trick for Stockfish. I still haven't been able to compile a binary compatible with 10.5.zullil wrote:Perhaps Allard needs to recompile with
Code: Select all
$CFLAGS = -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk -mmacosx-version-min=10.5
-
IanO
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:45 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Spark 0.4 for Mac OSX released
Thanks for the Mac OS X support!Allard Siemelink wrote:Spark 0.4 for Mac OSX, Intel 64-bit is now availabe from
http://members.ziggo.nl/allard.siemelink/spark/
Spark 0.4 with Dr. Deeb's excellent book is now the fourth strongest engine in my stable at speed chess time controls. It comes in below Hiarcs 13.1b and Stockfish 1.6.3, and above Hiarcs 12.1 and Stockfish 1.5.1. Version 0.4 is quite a bit stronger than 0.3 which was around the strength of Glaurung 2.2.