Graham Banks wrote:
from Chris Whittington's post that I quoted, it appears as though Vas is not sure whether he's going to get a whole lot of questions to answer or an apology instead.
So it doesn't look as though he's actually 'asked' for an apology.
thanks for trying to summarize where we stand Graham
but i am still a bit confused(normal for me)
as i take it then..
we are at an impasse?
the chief questioners are waiting for an answer to the first(and only question) posted 5-6 days ago...
and Vas will only respond when all questions are in ?
we are in a stalemate then?
Steve
Last edited by Steve B on Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Graham Banks wrote:
I think that the accusers are wanting Vas to answer the questions they've asked to date, but Vas has said he'll wait until they've finished all their analysis before responding. That is if the expected apology from the accusers is not made instead.
Hah, funny stuff.
No matter how much evidence will be posted, people will endlessly defend Rybka, in the same way they endlessly defended Toga (D'oh!) , Strelka, and whichever other "derived" work emerges that is strong. No rules apply when it is strong.
Vas = God. And it's a bit like trying to have a logical philosophical debate with religious folk. Mind numbing, very unhealthy and completely pointless.
Keep up the good work Zach, Christophe, and others. Not so much for this Rybka thing (I don't care) but for smoking out the >insert ugly word< out of this place into the open where they can be seen. It has a certain entertainment value.
tiger wrote:
Too many posts to read, I think I have missed this one.
So somebody has asked for an apology?
Please give us some time to prepare one.
Thank you in advance.
// Christophe
Hi Christophe,
from Chris Whittington's post that I quoted, it appears as though Vas is not sure whether he's going to get a whole lot of questions to answer or an apology instead.
So it doesn't look as though he's actually 'asked' for an apology.
Graham Banks wrote:
from Chris Whittington's post that I quoted, it appears as though Vas is not sure whether he's going to get a whole lot of questions to answer or an apology instead.
So it doesn't look as though he's actually 'asked' for an apology.
thanks for trying to summarize where we stand Graham
but i am still a bit confused(normal for me)
as i take it then..
we are at an impasse?
the chief questioners are waiting for an answer to the first(and only question) posted 5-6 days ago...
and Vas will only respond when all questions are in ?
Graham Banks wrote:
I think that the accusers are wanting Vas to answer the questions they've asked to date, but Vas has said he'll wait until they've finished all their analysis before responding. That is if the expected apology from the accusers is not made instead.
Hah, funny stuff.
No matter how much evidence will be posted, people will endlessly defend Rybka, in the same way they endlessly defended Toga (D'oh!) , Strelka, and whichever other "derived" work emerges that is strong. No rules apply when it is strong.
Vas = God. And it's a bit like trying to have a logical philosophical debate with religious folk. Mind numbing, very unhealthy and completely pointless.
Keep up the good work Zach, Christophe, and others. Not so much for this Rybka thing (I don't care) but for smoking out the >insert ugly word< out of this place into the open where they can be seen. It has a certain entertainment value.
Stan
You're making the assumption that Vas has done something wrong. Let's just see what happens.
Graham Banks wrote:
Yes - seems like a stalemate at present.
Regards, Graham.
aha
ok thanks
if anything of substance happens please post it here so i can get right to the meat and potatoes
consider it that you are issuing a tournament bulletin which summarizes the daily events of a tournament..without all of the rhetoric
seriously thanks for the update
Steve
Last edited by Steve B on Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
tiger wrote:
Too many posts to read, I think I have missed this one.
So somebody has asked for an apology?
Please give us some time to prepare one.
Thank you in advance.
// Christophe
Hi Christophe,
from Chris Whittington's post that I quoted, it appears as though Vas is not sure whether he's going to get a whole lot of questions to answer or an apology instead.
So it doesn't look as though he's actually 'asked' for an apology.
Sorry to recall wrongly,
Graham.
OK, it's definitely the twilight zone.
What about an apology and a box of chocolate? With an autograph from Zach, Norman, me, Bob, Tony, Andreas, Terry, Eric, Thorsten, Alexander, Evgenii, Andy, Steve, Jens, Johan...(sorry the list is too long)?
// Christophe
Last edited by tiger on Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Graham Banks wrote:
from Chris Whittington's post that I quoted, it appears as though Vas is not sure whether he's going to get a whole lot of questions to answer or an apology instead.
So it doesn't look as though he's actually 'asked' for an apology.
thanks for trying to summarize where we stand Graham
but i am still a bit confused(normal for me)
as i take it then..
we are at an impasse?
the chief questioners are waiting for an answer to the first(and only question) posted 5-6 days ago...
and Vas will only respond when all questions are in ?
we are in a stalemate then?
Steve
Yes - seems like a stalemate at present.
Regards, Graham.
aha
ok thanks
if anything of substance happens please post it here so i can get right to the meat and potatoes
consider it that you are issuing a tournament bulletin which summarizes the daily events of a tournament..without all of the rhetoric
seriously thanks for the update
Steve
No problem Steve. Happy to help out, even though I had to correct myself along the way!
tiger wrote:
Too many posts to read, I think I have missed this one.
So somebody has asked for an apology?
Please give us some time to prepare one.
Thank you in advance.
// Christophe
Hi Christophe,
from Chris Whittington's post that I quoted, it appears as though Vas is not sure whether he's going to get a whole lot of questions to answer or an apology instead.
So it doesn't look as though he's actually 'asked' for an apology.
Graham Banks wrote:
from Chris Whittington's post that I quoted, it appears as though Vas is not sure whether he's going to get a whole lot of questions to answer or an apology instead.
So it doesn't look as though he's actually 'asked' for an apology.
thanks for trying to summarize where we stand Graham
but i am still a bit confused(normal for me)
as i take it then..
we are at an impasse?
the chief questioners are waiting for an answer to the first(and only question) posted 5-6 days ago...
and Vas will only respond when all questions are in ?
we are in a stalemate then?
Steve
Yes - seems like a stalemate at present.
Regards, Graham.
Correct. There's no point in further discussion until the anti-camp have come up with a formal statement.
All that is (has been) happening is a 'tis 'tisnt between me an Bob. A trolling personal insult campaign on me by Christophe, a stressed Zach and lots of noise. I suppose the inevitable result of launching a major attack on a successful programming team without at all preparing the homework.
Meanwhile Rybka is under open threat without evidence at Beijing whilst our brave and fearless antis pore over disassembly listings desperately trying to justify their original attacks.
