Re: Opteron versus Xeon

It would not be a nanoprocessor. A 16 nanometer "process"
(not processor) doesn't mean the cpu is 16 nanometers in size.

Think about it; you can easily see the cpu in your computer without
a microscope.

So you would only need a magnifying glass to see a microprocessor.

Best
Dan H.

Not just a magnifying glass .... you need a microscope to see a microprocessor.

I was just going by what Charles said. If you need a microscope to see a nanoprocessor I figured the microprocessor wouldn't require more than a magnifying glass. Now, if what you say is right then Charles is wrong and you'll need a nanoscope to see the nanoprocessor.

Best
Dan H.
Statistics: Posted by Dan Honeycutt — Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:58 pm