Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.
Moderators: hgm, Harvey Williamson, bob
Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
-
Stan Arts
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 9:53 pm
- Location: the Netherlands
Post
by Stan Arts » Sat Dec 24, 2016 5:18 pm
Nemeton 1.5
Using mobility from the last full width plies movegenetion in evaluation. Sounds risky as quiescence captures have no effect on it but it's for free speed-wise and works better than expected.
Tuning down king safety better as pieces come off.
Passed pawns are scored better. Less to prevent wrong piece sacs but much more when they reach 7th.
In search doing researches on reduced nodes that were predicted wrong. A bit of Elo and longer PV's though I don't like how it sits in my code so probably just temporary.
Code: Select all
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AoJ9t41CkccXhH3LWi4CehMFTvYm
Happy holidays,
Stan Arts
-
hgm
- Posts: 22274
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
-
Contact:
Post
by hgm » Sat Dec 24, 2016 7:07 pm
I once tried a technique I called 'static mobility', which in theory should be an improvement on just using the mobility from the last pre-QS node. This determined the mobility of each piece separately, and added the resulting eval bonus to the value of that piece. That way, if during QS pieces are captured, their mobility contribution disappears with them. Of course there are other mobility changes that you would still miss (e.g. unblocking).
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 30733
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Post
by Graham Banks » Sat Dec 24, 2016 7:29 pm
Thanks Stan.
Is it available for download yet?
My email addresses:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
gbanksnz at yahoo.co.nz
-
Sven
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 7:57 pm
- Location: Berlin, Germany
Post
by Sven » Sat Dec 24, 2016 10:49 pm
Graham Banks wrote:Thanks Stan.
Is it available for download yet?
See the link above (
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AoJ9t41CkccXhH3LWi4CehMFTvYm). I wanted to repeat it here with the normal "url" tags around it but for some reason it did not work.
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 30733
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Post
by Graham Banks » Sat Dec 24, 2016 10:59 pm
Sven Schüle wrote:Graham Banks wrote:Thanks Stan.
Is it available for download yet?
See the link above (
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AoJ9t41CkccXhH3LWi4CehMFTvYm). I wanted to repeat it here with the normal "url" tags around it but for some reason it did not work.
Thanks. Got it.

My email addresses:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
gbanksnz at yahoo.co.nz
-
Stan Arts
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 9:53 pm
- Location: the Netherlands
Post
by Stan Arts » Mon Dec 26, 2016 9:30 pm
hgm wrote:I once tried a technique I called 'static mobility', which in theory should be an improvement on just using the mobility from the last pre-QS node. This determined the mobility of each piece separately, and added the resulting eval bonus to the value of that piece. That way, if during QS pieces are captured, their mobility contribution disappears with them. Of course there are other mobility changes that you would still miss (e.g. unblocking).
Good idea! Are you using this now and if not why not?
Though the current bang for the buck implementation works surprisingly well. Was expecting a lot of search instability but hard to notice more than usual. No doubt it does some funky things in branches we rarely see but ofcourse deeper search results in search instability/more accurate evaluation anyway so I was ready to accept this as part of that as the netto result is better play.
Splitting up into separate pieces was something I wanted to try but to be able to score them differently. (so that I can also remove specific bishop mobility in eval and get even more speeeed) And recalculating mobility per captured piece AFTER captures but your idea is simpler.
-
Stan Arts
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 9:53 pm
- Location: the Netherlands
Post
by Stan Arts » Mon Dec 26, 2016 9:35 pm
Sven Schüle wrote:Graham Banks wrote:Thanks Stan.
Is it available for download yet?
See the link above (
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AoJ9t41CkccXhH3LWi4CehMFTvYm). I wanted to repeat it here with the normal "url" tags around it but for some reason it did not work.
Indeed TalkChess does not like the link much. It stops turning it blue and clickable at the exclamation mark. Can't blame it.
-
Sven
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 7:57 pm
- Location: Berlin, Germany
Post
by Sven » Mon Dec 26, 2016 10:07 pm
Stan Arts wrote:Sven Schüle wrote:Graham Banks wrote:Thanks Stan.
Is it available for download yet?
See the link above (
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AoJ9t41CkccXhH3LWi4CehMFTvYm). I wanted to repeat it here with the normal "url" tags around it but for some reason it did not work.
Indeed TalkChess does not like the link much. It stops turning it blue and clickable at the exclamation mark. Can't blame it.
So
using an escape code does the trick.
-
Sylwy
- Posts: 3358
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:19 pm
- Location: IASI (Romania) - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Post
by Sylwy » Fri Jan 06, 2017 5:33 pm
-
Dokterchen
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:18 am
- Location: Munich
Post
by Dokterchen » Sat Jan 07, 2017 2:29 pm
Hi Stan,
SMP version?
Torsten