Hi!
I just published a new version of Andscacs, 0.60l, with support for 32 bit windows, but it is 50 elo points weaker.
Also all versions will not ask for msvcp100.dll if it is not installed on the computer, so will be easier for users to use it without external dependences.
It's normal to lose 50 elo points from 64 to 32 bits? What tells your experience on this?
Thanks!
http://www.andscacs.com/[/url]
Andscacs - New version
Moderators: hgm, Harvey Williamson, bob
Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Andscacs - New version
Daniel José -
http://www.andscacs.com
-
Jamal Bubker
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 2:32 pm
Re: Andscacs - New version
Thanks Daniel for this new release 
Re: Andscacs - New version
Hardends2013 on i7 2670QM 4cores -> 10sec./position!
1core engines are marked with 1c after engine name.
Solving: C:\Users\jpqy\Documents\ChessBase\Testsets\hardends2013\chessbase\hardends2013.cbh
Maximum time = 10s.
1. Hernandez,R - Sula,Z, Saloniki ol 1984 Solved in 1.75s/16; Solved: 1
2. Maiwald,J - Bischoff,K, Gladenbach ch-Deutschland 1997 > 10s.
3. Platov,V, 1911 > 10s.
4. Topalov,V - Shirov,A, Linares 1998 > 10s.
5. Smyslov,V - Gurgenidze,B, Tbilisi ch-USSR 1966 > 10s.
6. Chekhover,V - Lasker,E, Moscow 1935 > 10s.
7. Spiridonov,N - Shamkovich,L, Polanica Zdroj 1970 > 10s.
8. Polugaevsky,L - Ree,H, Amsterdam 1981 > 10s.
9. Seyboth,H, 1908 > 10s.
10. Rovner,D - Schipunov, Kiev 1938 > 10s.
11. Karpov,A - Knaak,R, Baden-Baden 1992 > 10s.
12. Smyslov,V, 1999 > 10s.
13. Riabinin,N, 1993 Solved in 1.48s/10; Solved: 2
14. Simkhovich,F, 1926 Solved in 0.25s/6; Solved: 3
15. Ree,H - Hort,V, Wijk aan Zee 1986 > 10s.
16. W.Eigenmann > 10s.
17. Uhlmann - Malich, Berlin 1968 > 10s.
18. Beliavsky,A - Dolmatov,S, Minsk ch-USSR 1979 Solved in 0.23s/7; Solved: 4
19. Pos. 9 - Kasparian 1969 > 10s.
20. Stangl,M - Schneider,A, Berlin 1992 Solved in 0.14s/6; Solved: 5
21. Sax,G - Kovacevic,V, Sarajevo 1982 > 10s.
22. Schoneberg,M - Starck,B, Weimar 1968 > 10s.
23. Kotov,A - Botvinnik,M, Moscow ch-USSR 1955 > 10s.
24. Kaidanov,G - Antoshin,V, RSFSR ch 1984 > 10s.
25. Smyslov,V - Gurgenidze,B, Tbilisi ch-USSR 1966 > 10s.
26. Nebylitsyn - Galuzin, USSR 1969 > 10s.
27. Chigorin,M - Tarrasch,S, Budapest 1896 > 10s.
28. Matanovic,A - Larsen,B, Portoroz izt 1958 Solved in 0.19s/6; Solved: 6
29. Villeneuve,A, 1984 Solved in 4.29s/13; Solved: 7
30. Khenkin,V, 1966 > 10s.
31. Tukmakov,V - Veingold,A, USSR 1979 > 10s.
32. Gufeld,E - Kavalek,L, Marianske Lazne tt jr 1962 > 10s.
33. Cathignol,P, 1981 > 10s.
34. Yudasin,L - Kramnik,V, Wijk aan Zee cm 1994 > 10s.
35. Behting,K, 1906 > 10s.
36. Gurvich,A, 1952 Solved in 0.50s/11; Solved: 8
37. Simkhovich,F, 1927 > 10s.
38. Gurgenidze,D, 1979 > 10s.
39. fortitude > 10s.
40. Pos. 3 > 10s.
Andscacs 0.60l 1c
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 1.10s / 9.37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not bad..and here under you have a idea where he take place:
Arminius2013-08-10
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 0.81s / 11.00
Komodo TCECr
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 0.82s / 14.87
Komodo CCT 1c
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 1.03s / 13.37
Andscacs 0.60l 1c
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 1.10s / 9.37
ProDeo 1.86 1c
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 1.13s / 11.75
Chiron 2.0
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 1.25s / 16.87
Sting SF 4 x32
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 1.91s / 19.37
Gull R600
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 1.97s / 14.50
Deep Saros 4.1.6
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 2.52s / 14.50
Firenzina 2.4.1
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 3.01s / 15.75
Robodini 1.1 1c
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 3.11s / 17.12
JP.
1core engines are marked with 1c after engine name.
Solving: C:\Users\jpqy\Documents\ChessBase\Testsets\hardends2013\chessbase\hardends2013.cbh
Maximum time = 10s.
1. Hernandez,R - Sula,Z, Saloniki ol 1984 Solved in 1.75s/16; Solved: 1
2. Maiwald,J - Bischoff,K, Gladenbach ch-Deutschland 1997 > 10s.
3. Platov,V, 1911 > 10s.
4. Topalov,V - Shirov,A, Linares 1998 > 10s.
5. Smyslov,V - Gurgenidze,B, Tbilisi ch-USSR 1966 > 10s.
6. Chekhover,V - Lasker,E, Moscow 1935 > 10s.
7. Spiridonov,N - Shamkovich,L, Polanica Zdroj 1970 > 10s.
8. Polugaevsky,L - Ree,H, Amsterdam 1981 > 10s.
9. Seyboth,H, 1908 > 10s.
10. Rovner,D - Schipunov, Kiev 1938 > 10s.
11. Karpov,A - Knaak,R, Baden-Baden 1992 > 10s.
12. Smyslov,V, 1999 > 10s.
13. Riabinin,N, 1993 Solved in 1.48s/10; Solved: 2
14. Simkhovich,F, 1926 Solved in 0.25s/6; Solved: 3
15. Ree,H - Hort,V, Wijk aan Zee 1986 > 10s.
16. W.Eigenmann > 10s.
17. Uhlmann - Malich, Berlin 1968 > 10s.
18. Beliavsky,A - Dolmatov,S, Minsk ch-USSR 1979 Solved in 0.23s/7; Solved: 4
19. Pos. 9 - Kasparian 1969 > 10s.
20. Stangl,M - Schneider,A, Berlin 1992 Solved in 0.14s/6; Solved: 5
21. Sax,G - Kovacevic,V, Sarajevo 1982 > 10s.
22. Schoneberg,M - Starck,B, Weimar 1968 > 10s.
23. Kotov,A - Botvinnik,M, Moscow ch-USSR 1955 > 10s.
24. Kaidanov,G - Antoshin,V, RSFSR ch 1984 > 10s.
25. Smyslov,V - Gurgenidze,B, Tbilisi ch-USSR 1966 > 10s.
26. Nebylitsyn - Galuzin, USSR 1969 > 10s.
27. Chigorin,M - Tarrasch,S, Budapest 1896 > 10s.
28. Matanovic,A - Larsen,B, Portoroz izt 1958 Solved in 0.19s/6; Solved: 6
29. Villeneuve,A, 1984 Solved in 4.29s/13; Solved: 7
30. Khenkin,V, 1966 > 10s.
31. Tukmakov,V - Veingold,A, USSR 1979 > 10s.
32. Gufeld,E - Kavalek,L, Marianske Lazne tt jr 1962 > 10s.
33. Cathignol,P, 1981 > 10s.
34. Yudasin,L - Kramnik,V, Wijk aan Zee cm 1994 > 10s.
35. Behting,K, 1906 > 10s.
36. Gurvich,A, 1952 Solved in 0.50s/11; Solved: 8
37. Simkhovich,F, 1927 > 10s.
38. Gurgenidze,D, 1979 > 10s.
39. fortitude > 10s.
40. Pos. 3 > 10s.
Andscacs 0.60l 1c
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 1.10s / 9.37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not bad..and here under you have a idea where he take place:
Arminius2013-08-10
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 0.81s / 11.00
Komodo TCECr
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 0.82s / 14.87
Komodo CCT 1c
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 1.03s / 13.37
Andscacs 0.60l 1c
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 1.10s / 9.37
ProDeo 1.86 1c
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 1.13s / 11.75
Chiron 2.0
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 1.25s / 16.87
Sting SF 4 x32
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 1.91s / 19.37
Gull R600
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 1.97s / 14.50
Deep Saros 4.1.6
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 2.52s / 14.50
Firenzina 2.4.1
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 3.01s / 15.75
Robodini 1.1 1c
Result: 8 out of 40 = 20.0%. Average time = 3.11s / 17.12
JP.
Re: Andscacs - New version
Thanks!
So all the engines solved same number of positions, 8?
And Andscacs was the 4th fastest?
May be I didn't understand.
Dani.
So all the engines solved same number of positions, 8?
And Andscacs was the 4th fastest?
May be I didn't understand.
Dani.
Daniel José -
http://www.andscacs.com
Re: Andscacs - New version
Almost same in my case on fast tc 40/20s.It's normal to lose 50 elo points from 64 to 32 bits? What tells your experience on this?
Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo (+/-) Games Score Draws
1 D14-117-x64 31.4 21.6 138 59.1% 43%
2 D14-117-x32 -31.4 21.5 138 40.9% 43% 