Yes of course it's a direct Ippolit derivative...it started as Firebird (myself along with Milos S.)carldaman wrote:I believe it's derived from both Ivanhoe and Robbolito.Werewolf wrote:is Fire derived from another engine?
complete history is here: http://www.chesslogik.com/fire.htm
Considering IvanHoe, I believe the problem was that the authors got much too caught up adding features
(monte carlo, robbobases, GUIs, etc., etc.)
That software is incredibly feature rich! They never concentrated on, or worked sufficiently at adding strength IMO
I also spent far too much time adding features to Fire 2.2, (170 configurable parameters, etc.)
because it seems most users judge the success of a release by ELO
Anyway, I've worked on Fire 3.0 privately most of this year since closing the source code, running tests on 2 6 core i7s 24/7 and concentrating on strength only...
I have made some progress with 3.0, but it remains to be seen how these improvements translate (scale) to longer TCs
PS - I strongly advise against anyone trying to develop or improve an existing chess engine unless they can endure endless and incredibly tedious work
recording tests in a spreadsheet, making a small change, compiling, setting up the test, waiting for results, and repeating this process over and over for many months, even years...yuck! (well i guess there's worse things)
Don D. said it best: people who develop chess engines don't have a life
IMO that's why people like Don Daily, Larry Kaufman, R. Houdart, Marco C. and the Stockfish team, deserve real kudos for their exceptional dedication and effort in this regard!
Ok my ramblings aside:
I just posted 4 more compiles
Fire 3.0 GEN
these are (generic) binaries should work on most systems that don't support AVX or SSE42
http://chesslogik.wix.com/fire

