RedQueen 0.6
Moderators: hgm, Harvey Williamson, bob
Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
-
bhlangonijr
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:23 am
- Location: Milky Way
- Contact:
RedQueen 0.6
Released RedQueen 0.6
- Search class was completely refactored;
- fixed a lot of bugs in search;
- Optimization of evaluation function by using pre-processed information;
- Improved king safety evaluation;
- Improved transposition table by implementing replacement strategies;
- Improved move ordering of root moves;
- Implemented pondering.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/redqueenchess/
It may be 100 elo stronger than 0.5.
Regards,
- Search class was completely refactored;
- fixed a lot of bugs in search;
- Optimization of evaluation function by using pre-processed information;
- Improved king safety evaluation;
- Improved transposition table by implementing replacement strategies;
- Improved move ordering of root moves;
- Implemented pondering.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/redqueenchess/
It may be 100 elo stronger than 0.5.
Regards,
- Graham Banks
- Posts: 30733
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: RedQueen 0.6
Thanks. Looking forward to seeing how it fares.
Cheers,
Graham.
Cheers,
Graham.
My email addresses:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
gbanksnz at yahoo.co.nz
gbanksnz at gmail.com
gbanksnz at yahoo.co.nz
- Graham Banks
- Posts: 30733
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: RedQueen 0.6
RedQueen 0.6 won a small match here against FireFly 2.5.6 by 6.0-4.0.
I realise that such a small number of games is random noise, but from watching some of the games. it seemed to be that RedQueen was the stronger of the two engines.
I'll put RedQueen 0.6 up a division in my amateur series and see how she does against the following field:
Feuerstein 0.4.6.1
Gibbon 2.52a
Atak 6.7
BlackBishop 1.0
Mediocre 0.34
Alex 2.07a
Knockout 0.7.1
KMTchess 1.2.1
Bearded 06_29_02
Adam 3.2
Simplex 0.9.3
Cheers,
Graham.
I realise that such a small number of games is random noise, but from watching some of the games. it seemed to be that RedQueen was the stronger of the two engines.
I'll put RedQueen 0.6 up a division in my amateur series and see how she does against the following field:
Feuerstein 0.4.6.1
Gibbon 2.52a
Atak 6.7
BlackBishop 1.0
Mediocre 0.34
Alex 2.07a
Knockout 0.7.1
KMTchess 1.2.1
Bearded 06_29_02
Adam 3.2
Simplex 0.9.3
Cheers,
Graham.
My email addresses:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
gbanksnz at yahoo.co.nz
gbanksnz at gmail.com
gbanksnz at yahoo.co.nz
-
bhlangonijr
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:23 am
- Location: Milky Way
- Contact:
Re: RedQueen 0.6
Hi Graham,Graham Banks wrote:RedQueen 0.6 won a small match here against FireFly 2.5.6 by 6.0-4.0.
I realise that such a small number of games is random noise, but from watching some of the games. it seemed to be that RedQueen was the stronger of the two engines.
I'll put RedQueen 0.6 up a division in my amateur series and see how she does against the following field:
Feuerstein 0.4.6.1
Gibbon 2.52a
Atak 6.7
BlackBishop 1.0
Mediocre 0.34
Alex 2.07a
Knockout 0.7.1
KMTchess 1.2.1
Bearded 06_29_02
Adam 3.2
Simplex 0.9.3
Cheers,
Graham.
i have only tested version 0.6 against old versions of Redqueen. After 2400 games using gaviota-starters Redqueen 0.6 is about 150 Elo stronger than 0.5. But I don't know if it will hold this Elo gain against different opponents.
BTW, thanks for testing Redqueen. It is nice to know that not everyone is only interested in top engines.
- Graham Banks
- Posts: 30733
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: RedQueen 0.6
Yeah - it's funny how the clone lovers like to call me a Rybka fanboy just because I'm not interested in wasting my time testing their "engines".!bhlangonijr wrote: Hi Graham,
i have only tested version 0.6 against old versions of Redqueen. After 2400 games using gaviota-starters Redqueen 0.6 is about 150 Elo stronger than 0.5. But I don't know if it will hold this Elo gain against different opponents.
BTW, thanks for testing Redqueen. It is nice to know that not everyone is only interested in top engines.
Thanks for your efforts.
Cheers,
Graham.
Last edited by Graham Banks on Sun Aug 22, 2010 8:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
My email addresses:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
gbanksnz at yahoo.co.nz
gbanksnz at gmail.com
gbanksnz at yahoo.co.nz
Re: RedQueen 0.6
Can we look forward for a 64bit compile?bhlangonijr wrote:Released RedQueen 0.6
https://sourceforge.net/projects/redqueenchess/
It may be 100 elo stronger than 0.5.
Regards,
...perhaps from Jim?
Werner
-
bhlangonijr
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:23 am
- Location: Milky Way
- Contact:
Re: RedQueen 0.6
Hi Werner,Werner wrote:Can we look forward for a 64bit compile?bhlangonijr wrote:Released RedQueen 0.6
https://sourceforge.net/projects/redqueenchess/
It may be 100 elo stronger than 0.5.
Regards,
...perhaps from Jim?
Yes, As soon as I get installed windows 7 in one of my computers.
Lets wait for Jim's compiles.
-
bhlangonijr
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:23 am
- Location: Milky Way
- Contact:
Re: RedQueen 0.6
YeahGraham Banks wrote:Yeah - it's funny how the clone lovers like to call me a Rybka fanboy just because I'm not interested in wasting my time testing their "engines".!bhlangonijr wrote: Hi Graham,
i have only tested version 0.6 against old versions of Redqueen. After 2400 games using gaviota-starters Redqueen 0.6 is about 150 Elo stronger than 0.5. But I don't know if it will hold this Elo gain against different opponents.
BTW, thanks for testing Redqueen. It is nice to know that not everyone is only interested in top engines.![]()
![]()
Thanks for your efforts.
Cheers,
Graham.
Well if they are happy testing "new" versions with only few parameters changes... Good for them!
