hi usualy people using 2,4,8,12,16.. cores
what if use 3 ,5,7 cores? will affect the perfomance?
using 3,5,7cores
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 1796
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:24 pm
Re: using 3,5,7cores
I remember Houdart saying it was fine. I also typically use an even number of cores doubling from 2, but that's more out of habit than something rational.
-
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm
Re: using 3,5,7cores
Many people use a odd number cores, or threads. For responsiveness, and it works fine.
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
-
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm
Re: using 3,5,7cores
Many people use a odd number cores, or threads. For responsiveness, and it works fine.
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
-
- Posts: 12540
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Redmond, WA USA
Re: using 3,5,7cores
I do it all the time.
Very frequently, I will have a machine do chess analysis with (total possible threads -1).
So on my AMD 3970x, I will give 63 threads.
I like to have one thread free because some programs lock the CPU so tight you can no longer log in to the machine remotely if you use every thread.
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
-
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm
Re: using 3,5,7cores
Yes. And you could also run the chess engines at a lower priority. This way if not needed. All 64 threads are used for chess analysis, and they will give way when needed.Dann Corbit wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2020 7:10 pmI do it all the time.
Very frequently, I will have a machine do chess analysis with (total possible threads -1).
So on my AMD 3970x, I will give 63 threads.
I like to have one thread free because some programs lock the CPU so tight you can no longer log in to the machine remotely if you use every thread.
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.