In my experience any diffences between how engines play with handicaps or with certain openings etc. are usually fairly small. The higher rated engine always does better, unless they are very close. It is possible that CM has extensive knowledge about how to play when a piece ahead, but extremely unlikely. One exception is that engines have trouble giving weaker or crippled versions of themselves as much handicap as you would expect based on ratings.Uri Blass wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:06 amI think that the only way to know is simply by playing.lkaufman wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 4:17 amThanks, I wrongly assumed that if it wasn't on the 40/4 list, it wouldn't be on the 40/40. So if I'm right about adding 100 for FIDE comparisons at standard time limit, only the world's top twenty would be favored against it. Of course we didn't specify the processor or opening book, these things matter. Anyway it is about a class weaker than the Arasan 18.0 which I've been using in my handicap matches. Probably this means that Komodo vs CM 9000 both on one thread would be a close match at knight odds at some rapid (not blitz) time control. But it doesn't follow that we could give knight odds at that time control to world number 20 human.Vinvin wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:30 amCode: Select all
Chessmaster 11 Aiglos II 2700 Chessmaster 11 2664 CM9000 Default 2639 CM10th Default 2632
It may be interesting to have knight odd rating list for chess engines.
It is possible that there are engines that are better in converting a knight advantage to a win and not better in normal chess.
CM is a class weaker than arasan18 in normal chess.
We do not know if it is a class weaker than arasan18 in knight odd games.
Why there is no interest in Computer with odds Vs Humans match?
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 5959
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: Why there is no interest in Computer with odds Vs Humans match?
Komodo rules!
-
- Posts: 5566
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
- Location: Moving
- Full name: Jorge Picado
Re: Why there is no interest in Computer with odds Vs Humans match?
I might be wrong to assume that Komodo is the program that performs best giving handicap odds, Am I correct, or there is another program like LC0 ?lkaufman wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:24 amIn my experience any diffences between how engines play with handicaps or with certain openings etc. are usually fairly small. The higher rated engine always does better, unless they are very close. It is possible that CM has extensive knowledge about how to play when a piece ahead, but extremely unlikely. One exception is that engines have trouble giving weaker or crippled versions of themselves as much handicap as you would expect based on ratings.Uri Blass wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:06 amI think that the only way to know is simply by playing.lkaufman wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 4:17 amThanks, I wrongly assumed that if it wasn't on the 40/4 list, it wouldn't be on the 40/40. So if I'm right about adding 100 for FIDE comparisons at standard time limit, only the world's top twenty would be favored against it. Of course we didn't specify the processor or opening book, these things matter. Anyway it is about a class weaker than the Arasan 18.0 which I've been using in my handicap matches. Probably this means that Komodo vs CM 9000 both on one thread would be a close match at knight odds at some rapid (not blitz) time control. But it doesn't follow that we could give knight odds at that time control to world number 20 human.Vinvin wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:30 amCode: Select all
Chessmaster 11 Aiglos II 2700 Chessmaster 11 2664 CM9000 Default 2639 CM10th Default 2632
It may be interesting to have knight odd rating list for chess engines.
It is possible that there are engines that are better in converting a knight advantage to a win and not better in normal chess.
CM is a class weaker than arasan18 in normal chess.
We do not know if it is a class weaker than arasan18 in knight odd games.
Do NOT worry and be happy, it is a short life
-
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: Why there is no interest in Computer with odds Vs Humans match?
Because, when does small material count?Chessqueen wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 6:47 am There should be more computer with 2 pawns or Knight vs pawn odds that will bring back the challenge of Humans GMs vs top Engines.
I believe that top GMs like Nakamura or MVL can bring back the excitement of Computer Vs Humans.
Mainly at the end of the end game, when there is almost left on the board. It's off-putting to always have to wait around.
What about earlier in the game?
Well, there can be so many tactics and maneuvers, in fact that's what chess is all about!
So what's so special about slightly imballanced material distribution? It's almost just like an alternative variant of standard chess.
The main thing earlier on in the game is how you are going to put more of your material into use. Players are constantly prepared to sacrifice material for more activity anyway. So why complicate it with a pawn difference in overall value with slightly altered position from the start? It's only a variant!
-
- Posts: 5959
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: Why there is no interest in Computer with odds Vs Humans match?
I ran Stockfish 10 against Arasan 18 at knight odds with same Contempt and time limit as Komodo. Stockfish lost by 14 elo less than Komodo did (57 elo vs 71), with the margin of error on each test a bit over 30. But Stockfish is rated 80 elo above Komodo 13.01 CCRL 40/4 1 cpu and 110 above on CEGT 40/4 1 cpu. So Komodo is much better than Stockfish at giving knight odds compared to its strength in even games, which is logical as it has special code about winning material advantages. As for Lc0, their first series of networks, culminating in 11248, is very good at giving handicaps; it scored about 70% in blitz games giving handicaps averaging around knight odds to GM Naroditsky, an excellent blitz player. However more recent networks are just awful at giving knight odds, they just make blunders. Lc0 just plays awful chess when the winning expectancy gets down below 2% or so. For the old networks that only happens around queen odds, but for the new ones it happens even below knight odds.Chessqueen wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:38 amI might be wrong to assume that Komodo is the program that performs best giving handicap odds, Am I correct, or there is another program like LC0 ?lkaufman wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:24 amIn my experience any diffences between how engines play with handicaps or with certain openings etc. are usually fairly small. The higher rated engine always does better, unless they are very close. It is possible that CM has extensive knowledge about how to play when a piece ahead, but extremely unlikely. One exception is that engines have trouble giving weaker or crippled versions of themselves as much handicap as you would expect based on ratings.Uri Blass wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:06 amI think that the only way to know is simply by playing.lkaufman wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 4:17 amThanks, I wrongly assumed that if it wasn't on the 40/4 list, it wouldn't be on the 40/40. So if I'm right about adding 100 for FIDE comparisons at standard time limit, only the world's top twenty would be favored against it. Of course we didn't specify the processor or opening book, these things matter. Anyway it is about a class weaker than the Arasan 18.0 which I've been using in my handicap matches. Probably this means that Komodo vs CM 9000 both on one thread would be a close match at knight odds at some rapid (not blitz) time control. But it doesn't follow that we could give knight odds at that time control to world number 20 human.Vinvin wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:30 amCode: Select all
Chessmaster 11 Aiglos II 2700 Chessmaster 11 2664 CM9000 Default 2639 CM10th Default 2632
It may be interesting to have knight odd rating list for chess engines.
It is possible that there are engines that are better in converting a knight advantage to a win and not better in normal chess.
CM is a class weaker than arasan18 in normal chess.
We do not know if it is a class weaker than arasan18 in knight odd games.
Komodo rules!
-
- Posts: 10216
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
- Location: Tel-Aviv Israel
Re: Why there is no interest in Computer with odds Vs Humans match?
I think that the same elo advantage in normal games is not translated to the same elo advantage with knight odds.lkaufman wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:14 pmI ran Stockfish 10 against Arasan 18 at knight odds with same Contempt and time limit as Komodo. Stockfish lost by 14 elo less than Komodo did (57 elo vs 71), with the margin of error on each test a bit over 30. But Stockfish is rated 80 elo above Komodo 13.01 CCRL 40/4 1 cpu and 110 above on CEGT 40/4 1 cpu. So Komodo is much better than Stockfish at giving knight odds compared to its strength in even games, which is logical as it has special code about winning material advantages. As for Lc0, their first series of networks, culminating in 11248, is very good at giving handicaps; it scored about 70% in blitz games giving handicaps averaging around knight odds to GM Naroditsky, an excellent blitz player. However more recent networks are just awful at giving knight odds, they just make blunders. Lc0 just plays awful chess when the winning expectancy gets down below 2% or so. For the old networks that only happens around queen odds, but for the new ones it happens even below knight odds.Chessqueen wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:38 amI might be wrong to assume that Komodo is the program that performs best giving handicap odds, Am I correct, or there is another program like LC0 ?lkaufman wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:24 amIn my experience any diffences between how engines play with handicaps or with certain openings etc. are usually fairly small. The higher rated engine always does better, unless they are very close. It is possible that CM has extensive knowledge about how to play when a piece ahead, but extremely unlikely. One exception is that engines have trouble giving weaker or crippled versions of themselves as much handicap as you would expect based on ratings.Uri Blass wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:06 amI think that the only way to know is simply by playing.lkaufman wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 4:17 amThanks, I wrongly assumed that if it wasn't on the 40/4 list, it wouldn't be on the 40/40. So if I'm right about adding 100 for FIDE comparisons at standard time limit, only the world's top twenty would be favored against it. Of course we didn't specify the processor or opening book, these things matter. Anyway it is about a class weaker than the Arasan 18.0 which I've been using in my handicap matches. Probably this means that Komodo vs CM 9000 both on one thread would be a close match at knight odds at some rapid (not blitz) time control. But it doesn't follow that we could give knight odds at that time control to world number 20 human.Vinvin wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:30 amCode: Select all
Chessmaster 11 Aiglos II 2700 Chessmaster 11 2664 CM9000 Default 2639 CM10th Default 2632
It may be interesting to have knight odd rating list for chess engines.
It is possible that there are engines that are better in converting a knight advantage to a win and not better in normal chess.
CM is a class weaker than arasan18 in normal chess.
We do not know if it is a class weaker than arasan18 in knight odd games.
The right comparison is of programs with the same playing strength
so you can compare stockfish10 1 cpu with komodo 4 cpu that are almost the same strength and see if komodo does better with knight odds and how much better.
-
- Posts: 5566
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
- Location: Moving
- Full name: Jorge Picado
Re: Why there is no interest in Computer with odds Vs Humans match?
I agree with Uri, you need to compare both programs when they become equal in strength even if you have to increase the number of cpu on Komodo and decrease it to Stockfish. I also wonder if somebody can test LCO against Arasan 18, the only problem would be to find out what GPU and hardware is comparable with Komodo latest odds.Uri Blass wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 9:40 pmI think that the same elo advantage in normal games is not translated to the same elo advantage with knight odds.lkaufman wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:14 pmI ran Stockfish 10 against Arasan 18 at knight odds with same Contempt and time limit as Komodo. Stockfish lost by 14 elo less than Komodo did (57 elo vs 71), with the margin of error on each test a bit over 30. But Stockfish is rated 80 elo above Komodo 13.01 CCRL 40/4 1 cpu and 110 above on CEGT 40/4 1 cpu. So Komodo is much better than Stockfish at giving knight odds compared to its strength in even games, which is logical as it has special code about winning material advantages. As for Lc0, their first series of networks, culminating in 11248, is very good at giving handicaps; it scored about 70% in blitz games giving handicaps averaging around knight odds to GM Naroditsky, an excellent blitz player. However more recent networks are just awful at giving knight odds, they just make blunders. Lc0 just plays awful chess when the winning expectancy gets down below 2% or so. For the old networks that only happens around queen odds, but for the new ones it happens even below knight odds.Chessqueen wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:38 amI might be wrong to assume that Komodo is the program that performs best giving handicap odds, Am I correct, or there is another program like LC0 ?lkaufman wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:24 amIn my experience any diffences between how engines play with handicaps or with certain openings etc. are usually fairly small. The higher rated engine always does better, unless they are very close. It is possible that CM has extensive knowledge about how to play when a piece ahead, but extremely unlikely. One exception is that engines have trouble giving weaker or crippled versions of themselves as much handicap as you would expect based on ratings.Uri Blass wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:06 amI think that the only way to know is simply by playing.lkaufman wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 4:17 amThanks, I wrongly assumed that if it wasn't on the 40/4 list, it wouldn't be on the 40/40. So if I'm right about adding 100 for FIDE comparisons at standard time limit, only the world's top twenty would be favored against it. Of course we didn't specify the processor or opening book, these things matter. Anyway it is about a class weaker than the Arasan 18.0 which I've been using in my handicap matches. Probably this means that Komodo vs CM 9000 both on one thread would be a close match at knight odds at some rapid (not blitz) time control. But it doesn't follow that we could give knight odds at that time control to world number 20 human.Vinvin wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:30 amCode: Select all
Chessmaster 11 Aiglos II 2700 Chessmaster 11 2664 CM9000 Default 2639 CM10th Default 2632
It may be interesting to have knight odd rating list for chess engines.
It is possible that there are engines that are better in converting a knight advantage to a win and not better in normal chess.
CM is a class weaker than arasan18 in normal chess.
We do not know if it is a class weaker than arasan18 in knight odd games.
The right comparison is of programs with the same playing strength
so you can compare Stockfish10 1 cpu with Komodo 4 cpu that are almost the same strength and see if Komodo does better with knight odds and how much better.
Do NOT worry and be happy, it is a short life
-
- Posts: 5566
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
- Location: Moving
- Full name: Jorge Picado
Re: Why there is no interest in Computer with odds Vs Humans match?
Since the testing of Chessmaster 11 Aiglos II 2700 was done, CCRL had an adjustment in rating, therefore, that rating could be much lower if Chessmaster 11 Aiglos II 2700 is tested again Nowadays. I believe that Arasan 18.0 is way stronger than Chessmaster 11 Aiglos II 2700
Do NOT worry and be happy, it is a short life
-
- Posts: 41385
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Why there is no interest in Computer with odds Vs Humans match?
I might be able to play a top engine with rook odds against the following player - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Dreyer.
In a six game match, how do you think he'd fare?
In a six game match, how do you think he'd fare?
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 5566
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
- Location: Moving
- Full name: Jorge Picado
Re: Why there is no interest in Computer with odds Vs Humans match?
In the year 1993 he was rated 2345, but depending how active he still is, a players over time lose somewhere between 50 to 100 rating points and in 26 years it could be very different than was he used to be. I would say based on that point of view that he might get one or two win versus Komodo with a knight odds, but with a Rook odds Komodo might still get a few draws if he is still around 2250 to 2275 Elo and that also depends on how many cpu you will use with KomodoGraham Banks wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2019 1:36 am I might be able to play a top engine with rook odds against the following player - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Dreyer.
In a six game match, how do you think he'd fare?
Do NOT worry and be happy, it is a short life
-
- Posts: 5566
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
- Location: Moving
- Full name: Jorge Picado
Re: Why there is no interest in Computer with odds Vs Humans match?
I would also let him play against one of these programs to see how is is standing head to head without odds ===>Chessqueen wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2019 2:47 amIn the year 1993 he was rated 2345, but depending how active he still is, a players over time lose somewhere between 50 to 100 rating points and in 26 years it could be very different than was he used to be. I would say based on that point of view that he might get one or two win versus Komodo with a knight odds, but with a Rook odds Komodo might still get a few draws if he is still around 2250 to 2275 Elo and that also depends on how many cpu you will use with KomodoGraham Banks wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2019 1:36 am I might be able to play a top engine with rook odds against the following player - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Dreyer.
In a six game match, how do you think he'd fare?
283‑284 Joker 1.1.14 2306 +13 −13 46.4% +25.6 20.8% 2461
52.7%
283‑284 Kingfisher 1.0 64-bit 2306 +17 −17 51.3% −8.4 36.5% 1166
55.4%
285 Tytan 9.32 64-bit 2304 +13 −13 46.4% +26.2 23.8% 2225
85.6%
286 Resp 0.19 64-bit Nobook 2296 +10 −10 49.8% −2.5 21.5% 3757
72.9%
287 Googleplex Starthinker 1.4 64-bit 2289 +18 −17 62.7% −97.1 20.5% 1303
58.1%
288 Ayito 0.2.994 2287 +11 −11 53.1% −25.5 19.1% 3519
54.6%
289 Chaturanga 2.4.3 2285 +27 −27 53.0% −21.7 19.8% 499
59.4%
290 Matilde 2008 64-bit 2282 +14 −13 53.2% −25.5 21.0% 2137
59.2%
291 Fischerle 0.9.80 SE 64-bit 2279 +16 −16 51.7% −11.7 23.1% 1405
66.3%
292 Rival 1.0.1 64-bit
Do NOT worry and be happy, it is a short life