Stockfish misevaluations:

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Henk
Posts: 7216
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:31 am

Stockfish misevaluations:

Post by Henk »

I encountered this position in a real human-human game. Me playing with white.

Stockfish 10 evaluates this as +3.30

[d] 4b3/5k2/p5p1/P2p1p1p/1PpPrP1P/2P2QP1/5K2/8 w - - 6 8

Stupid engines
User avatar
hgm
Posts: 27787
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
Location: Amsterdam
Full name: H G Muller

Re: Stockfish misevaluations:

Post by hgm »

Well, what can you expect from an engine that is only good on average?
mar
Posts: 2554
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:00 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Full name: Martin Sedlak

Re: Stockfish misevaluations:

Post by mar »

And what's wrong with that? White will eventually sac a pawn, break free and win the game :shock:
It will take some time with 50 move rule, sure, but white will win.
Martin Sedlak
User avatar
hgm
Posts: 27787
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
Location: Amsterdam
Full name: H G Muller

Re: Stockfish misevaluations:

Post by hgm »

With the Bishop on b5 the only Pawn you can sac is the g-Pawn, and after fxg4 black will simply put his King on f5, and white has nothing. Actually I would not be surprised if it was lost for white after such a sac.
Henk
Posts: 7216
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:31 am

Re: Stockfish misevaluations:

Post by Henk »

mar wrote: Mon Apr 22, 2019 5:06 pm And what's wrong with that? White will eventually sac a pawn, break free and win the game :shock:
It will take some time with 50 move rule, sure, but white will win.
How? I don't see it. Black can block everything. You mean sacrifice the b pawn. But then Bb5, Rc6 and Ke8 and Queen can't pass.

By the way Komodo 9: +1.82
Last edited by Henk on Mon Apr 22, 2019 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Henk
Posts: 7216
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:31 am

Re: Stockfish misevaluations:

Post by Henk »

hgm wrote: Mon Apr 22, 2019 4:37 pm Well, what can you expect from an engine that is only good on average?
Maybe best is to evaluate a position by playing some games and taking the average score. I don't know. Looks like alpha beta fails.
Zero method would do better.
mar
Posts: 2554
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:00 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Full name: Martin Sedlak

Re: Stockfish misevaluations:

Post by mar »

hgm wrote: Mon Apr 22, 2019 5:15 pm With the Bishop on b5 the only Pawn you can sac is the g-Pawn, and after fxg4 black will simply put his King on f5, and white has nothing. Actually I would not be surprised if it was lost for white after such a sac.
Yes, maybe I was too optimistic and this is indeed a draw with perfect play.
Is there actually any (non-buggy) engine to score this fortress as a dead draw?
This doesn't seem like a typical pawn fortress due to the open e file.
I just tried Critter which I know had some fortress detection code and it still scores this as +2.6 for white.
Martin Sedlak
mar
Posts: 2554
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:00 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Full name: Martin Sedlak

Re: Stockfish misevaluations:

Post by mar »

Henk wrote: Mon Apr 22, 2019 5:24 pm Maybe best is to evaluate a position by playing some games and taking the average score. I don't know. Looks like alpha beta fails.
Zero method would do better.
Maybe a random mover would score this position properly as 0.0
Martin Sedlak
Raphexon
Posts: 476
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:00 pm
Full name: Henk Drost

Re: Stockfish misevaluations:

Post by Raphexon »

Latest dev version of SF thinks it's winning. :oops:
+5.7 at depth 53/60
Still +5.38 at 62/73
Still +5.38 at 70.

I'll let it run for a few hours, maybe it will reach 127...
PK
Posts: 893
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:23 am
Location: Warsza

Re: Stockfish misevaluations:

Post by PK »

Perhaps it is a draw, perhaps a win, but it is white to move. Does any engine try immediate b5?