in case someone is interested:
http://www.inwoba.de/SF.html
SF8 got 76.9% against the same opponents and openings (see http://www.inwoba.de/bayes.html for details)
I use the Ultimaiq compile.
Best
Ingo
SF130118
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:40 am
- Full name:
Re: SF130118
Thanks for running the test Ingo!
I assume the test was stopped or connection was lost because at the moment the page is blank. Stopped after slightly over 600 games This was an intermediate result:
I assume the test was stopped or connection was lost because at the moment the page is blank. Stopped after slightly over 600 games This was an intermediate result:
Code: Select all
SF
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Houdini 6.02 (3349) 20.5 - 16.5 55.41% Perf=3386
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Komodo 11.2.2 (3318) 20.5 - 15.5 56.94% Perf=3366
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Shredder 13 (3124) 28.0 - 8.0 77.78% Perf=3341
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Fizbo 2 (3096) 30.0 - 7.0 81.08% Perf=3348
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Ginkgo 2.0 (3066) 32.5 - 4.5 87.84% Perf=3409
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Gull 3 (3060) 31.0 - 6.0 83.78% Perf=3345
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Andscacs 0.92 (3050) 34.5 - 3.5 90.79% Perf=3447
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Booot 6.2 (3031) 29.5 - 6.5 81.94% Perf=3293
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Jonny 8.00 (3028) 29.5 - 5.5 84.29% Perf=3319
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Fritz 16 (3020) 32.5 - 4.5 87.84% Perf=3363
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Equinox 3.30 (3014) 31.5 - 6.5 82.89% Perf=3288
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Chiron 4 (2994) 31.0 - 6.0 83.78% Perf=3279
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Critter 1.6a (2993) 29.0 - 8.0 78.38% Perf=3216
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Nirvanachess 2.4 (2969) 32.5 - 4.5 87.84% Perf=3312
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Hannibal 1.7 (2961) 32.5 - 4.5 87.84% Perf=3304
445.0 - 107.0 80.62% Perf=3318
552 out of 3300 games played
Level: 5 Minutes/Game + 3 sec/Move
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm
Re: SF130118
Thx, its fixed (for now)
FTP was stuck for whatever reason. Restarted it and it was working imediately ... !?
Ingo
FTP was stuck for whatever reason. Restarted it and it was working imediately ... !?
Ingo
-
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:40 am
- Full name:
Re: SF130118
Yes, it's working again Ingo... !?
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm
Re: SF130118
Sorry the FTP is crashing continously. it runs for a few minutes and then it is gone again.
I will restart it from time to time and post the final result tomorrow.
Sorry again
Ingo
I will restart it from time to time and post the final result tomorrow.
Sorry again
Ingo
-
- Posts: 3293
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm
Re: SF130118
... which might boost your toughest contenders ...Jouni wrote:Thanks for test. Obviously SF needs contempt 20 for Houdini rating.
-
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2014 9:16 am
Re: SF130118
Stockfish doesn't need anything. It's already better than all of these engines including Houdini. The only thing that matters is match versus match rather than match percentage versus all engines. So with Houdini losing badly versus Stockfish if Houdini stays at the top of the list then it simply makes this rating list meaningless. The best engine should never lose a single match versus match percentage versus any engine.Jouni wrote:Thanks for test. Obviously SF needs contempt 20 for Houdini rating.
Stockfish's rating should be about 3393 - whatever it scored against the over-hyped Houdini.
Last edited by APassionForCriminalJustic on Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm
Re: SF130118
Yea, who needs statistics and mathematcs. All fake news. Fxxx it!APassionForCriminalJustic wrote:Stockfish doesn't need anything. It's already better than all of these engines including Houdini. The only thing that matters is match versus match rather than match percentage versus all engines. So with Houdini losing badly versus Stockfish if Houdini stays at the top of the list then it simply makes this rating list meaningless.Jouni wrote:Thanks for test. Obviously SF needs contempt 20 for Houdini rating.
-
- Posts: 4611
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
Re: SF130118
Why test it all if the rating is known and fixed to 3393 according to criminalstats?IWB wrote:Yea, who needs statistics and mathematcs. All fake news. Fxxx it!APassionForCriminalJustic wrote:Stockfish doesn't need anything. It's already better than all of these engines including Houdini. The only thing that matters is match versus match rather than match percentage versus all engines. So with Houdini losing badly versus Stockfish if Houdini stays at the top of the list then it simply makes this rating list meaningless.Jouni wrote:Thanks for test. Obviously SF needs contempt 20 for Houdini rating.
https://rwbc-chess.de
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...