I used the term "lightweight" bacause this was the term Ilari used when referencing the cli vs the gui. So I was attemping to "relate" by speaking the same language.hgm wrote: Not sure what that has to do with being 'lightweight', however. Wether the GUI uses up 1%, 5% or 50% of the time should not affect the tourney result in the slightest.
Cute Chess 0.9.4 released
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 8:19 pm
Re: Cute Chess 0.9.4 released
-
- Posts: 855
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 1:32 pm
Re: Cute Chess 0.9.4 released
I'm having some problem with cutechess gui and Vajolet.
I'm testing vajolet with cutechess gui and I get a lot of lost game due to disconnection. I can't reproduce it with cutechess-cli.
I'll try to make a better BUG report as soon as possibile after some investigation.
I'm testing vajolet with cutechess gui and I get a lot of lost game due to disconnection. I can't reproduce it with cutechess-cli.
I'll try to make a better BUG report as soon as possibile after some investigation.
-
- Posts: 27828
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Cute Chess 0.9.4 released
I have no problem with the terminology. The point was why you would expect that it would make the slightest difference for the result of a tourney whether the GUI was light weight or heavy weight in this sense.PaulieD wrote:I used the term "lightweight" bacause this was the term Ilari used when referencing the cli vs the gui. So I was attemping to "relate" by speaking the same language.
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 8:19 pm
Re: Cute Chess 0.9.4 released
Because with version 0.9.3 it was slower and more cumbersome which affected those same resuts.hgm wrote: I have no problem with the terminology. The point was why you would expect that it would make the slightest difference for the result of a tourney whether the GUI was light weight or heavy weight in this sense.
-
- Posts: 27828
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Cute Chess 0.9.4 released
But there was no change in the speed or CPU use between version 0.9.3 and 0.9.4, was there? Just fixing of bugs.
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 8:19 pm
Re: Cute Chess 0.9.4 released
Well, it would appear that one or more of those "fixes" fixed ithgm wrote:But there was no change in the speed or CPU use between version 0.9.3 and 0.9.4, was there? Just fixing of bugs.
-
- Posts: 27828
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Cute Chess 0.9.4 released
Fixed your tourney, yes. But did not affect the 'weight'. So what did your tourney result tell us about the weight?
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 8:19 pm
Re: Cute Chess 0.9.4 released
A couple of posts ago, you claimed that you understood why and how the term "weight" was used.hgm wrote:Fixed your tourney, yes. But did not affect the 'weight'. So what did your tourney result tell us about the weight?
But now you are asking questions about the very same thing again?
I answered your question. I think my answer was easily understandable.
I don't want to litter this thread anymore with these semantics.
Understand it whatever way you choose to.
I am done responding about "weight".
-
- Posts: 27828
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Cute Chess 0.9.4 released
Well, I understand how Ilari (and everyone else) uses it: something is 'light weight' if it consumes few resources (such as memory, CPU, disk space), and 'heavy weight' when it consumes a lot.
If you think it can ever mean something else, (as your last posting suggests), and used it that way, you should not be surprised if no one understands you...
If you think it can ever mean something else, (as your last posting suggests), and used it that way, you should not be surprised if no one understands you...
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 8:19 pm
Re: Cute Chess 0.9.4 released
That is my definition also...over and out.hgm wrote:Well, I understand how Ilari (and everyone else) uses it: something is 'light weight' if it consumes few resources (such as memory, CPU, disk space), and 'heavy weight' when it consumes a lot.
If you think it can ever mean something else, (as your last posting suggests), and used it that way, you should not be surprised if no one understands you...