CEGT - rating lists January 10th 2016

[Werner]

Hi all,

our actual rating lists are online and can be found under the attached links.

40 / 20:
New games: 3.792; 38 different engines
Total: 896.133

NEW Engines
4 Stockfish 7.0 x64 4CPU: 3312 - 349 games (+10 to v. 6.0)
10 Stockfish 7.0 x64 1CPU: 3222 - 1200 games (+39 to v. 6.0)
(I have played 1000 games with bmi2 version on the Skylake PC)

444 ExChess v7.88b x64 1CPU: 2698 - 1000 games (+4 to v. 7.71b)
428 Vajolet2 2.1 x64 1CPU: 2705 - 883 games (-51 to v. 2.0;I do not know what happened; I played 2 matches parallel on the same pc- I will repeat a match and see what´s going on)
298 SmarThink 1.80 x64: 2778 - 600 games (+16 to v. 1.7.0)

UPDATES
388 Crafty 25.0 x64 1CPU: 2722 - 1400 games (-3)
454 Pedone 1.3 x64 1CPU: 2693 - 1502 games (+1)
17 Gull 3.0 x64 4CPU: 3194 - 4626 games (+1)

40 / 120:
There was an update on December 16th. Now 21.210 games and 80 engines. We are testing Komodo 9.3 x64.

5'+3'' pb=on
we started to test Stockfish 7.0 x64

40 / 4
no update;
We are testing
Stockfish 7.0 x64 1CPU 3254/1500 +52
Stockfish 7.0 x64 12CPU see more in our forum
Stockfish 7.0 x64 4CPU
iCE 3.0 v658 x64 2923/1300 +136!
SmarThink 1.80 x64 2824/1000 +56
ExChess v7.88b x64 2711/1000 +29
Vajolet2 2.1 x64 2765/1000 -1

A big „Thank you“ to all testers as usual!!

Links

40/20: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating.htm
Blitz: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/blitz.htm
40/120: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating120.htm
Tester: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/testers/testers.htm
40/20 pb=on: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating4020PBON.htm
5+3 pb=on: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating5plus3pbon.htm
Games of the week: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/40_40%2 ... on/gow.jpg

Werner Schüle
CEGT-Team

[elcabesa]

let's hope vajolet will not be too much weak than the old one.

[Werner]

let's hope vajolet will not be too much weak than the old one.

Hi Marco,
thanks for the answer. In our blitz tests it is equal but in 40/20 I do not know, why I have so bad results. I shall repeat 3 matches on 3 different PCs and in about 3 days I can compare.
best wishes
Werner

[elcabesa]

thank you.
I thnk vajolet2 2.1 should be of the same strenght of vajolet2 2.0. But I haven't tested it very carefully at longer timecontrol

[JJJ]

Really weird result for the stockfish here too, like CCRL.

[Leto]

Really weird result for the stockfish here too, like CCRL.

More games needed. The two results in which Stockfish 7 4CPU performed 200 elo weaker than it should had only 25 games each. Its only 100 game match against the new Komodo's it got a performance of 3352, slightly higher than the highest rated Komodo on the list (3342) and that result looks like what should be expected. I'm certain when more games are added SF7 4CPU will probably end up 40 to 60 elo higher than SF6.

[stavros]

Really weird result for the stockfish here too, like CCRL.

More games needed. The two results in which Stockfish 7 4CPU performed 200 elo weaker than it should had only 25 games each. Its only 100 game match against the new Komodo's it got a performance of 3352, slightly higher than the highest rated Komodo on the list (3342) and that result looks like what should be expected. I'm certain when more games are added SF7 4CPU will probably end up 40 to 60 elo higher than SF6.

exactly, look the high draw rate 60%! against weak engines .
against komodo 9.3 9.2 its a bit better

[Dr.Wael Deeb]

Really weird result for the stockfish here too, like CCRL.

More games needed. The two results in which Stockfish 7 4CPU performed 200 elo weaker than it should had only 25 games each. Its only 100 game match against the new Komodo's it got a performance of 3352, slightly higher than the highest rated Komodo on the list (3342) and that result looks like what should be expected. I'm certain when more games are added SF7 4CPU will probably end up 40 to 60 elo higher than SF6.

exactly, look the high draw rate 60%! against weak engines .
against komodo 9.3 9.2 its a bit better

And that's exactly the reason why the top engines must be tested against a wide range of opponents....

in my rating list I go down to 200 Elo weaker engines just to gather a clear picture of the real strength of the top notch chess engine if ever
Dr.D

[Dr.Wael Deeb]

Really weird result for the stockfish here too, like CCRL.

More games needed. The two results in which Stockfish 7 4CPU performed 200 elo weaker than it should had only 25 games each. Its only 100 game match against the new Komodo's it got a performance of 3352, slightly higher than the highest rated Komodo on the list (3342) and that result looks like what should be expected. I'm certain when more games are added SF7 4CPU will probably end up 40 to 60 elo higher than SF6.

exactly, look the high draw rate 60%! against weak engines .
against komodo 9.3 9.2 its a bit better

And that's exactly the reason why the top engines must be tested against a wide range of opponents....

In my rating list I go down to 200 Elo weaker engines just to gather a clear picture of the real strength of the top notch chess engine if ever
Dr.D

[Werner]

Hi,
our lists have been corrected:

NEW Engines
2 Stockfish 7.0 x64 4CPU: 3336 - 200 games (+24 to v. 6.0 - startrating)
10 Stockfish 7.0 x64 1CPU: 3230 - 1200 games (+46 to v. 6.0)

146 games have been played with 1CPU actually
Thanks for the hints.