Conditions:
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Book = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
Regards,
SilvianR
Test no.1 (DiscoCheck w32 comparative)
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 4465
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
-
- Posts: 4465
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: Test no.2 (w32 - Crafty 23.8 vs. Scorpoio 2.7.6)
A long awaited match !
Conditions:
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Book = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
Scorpio 2.7.6 JA was linked to Scorpio egbbbs.
Crafty 2.8 was linked to Nalimov TBS.
A very interesting match with many superb games !
SilvianR
Conditions:
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Book = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
Scorpio 2.7.6 JA was linked to Scorpio egbbbs.
Crafty 2.8 was linked to Nalimov TBS.
A very interesting match with many superb games !
SilvianR
-
- Posts: 4465
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: Test no.3 (w32 - SmarThink 1.40 vs. Bison 9.11)
Very good this new SmarThink 1.40 ! A pleasant chess and for sure the number one in pure Russian league ( no clones or derivatives) !
Bison 9.11 of Mr.Bonkin (a strong engine) was badly crushed !
Conditions:
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Book = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
SmarThink 1.40 was linked to Nalimov TBS.
Have - you all - a nice weekend !
SilvianR
Bison 9.11 of Mr.Bonkin (a strong engine) was badly crushed !
Conditions:
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Book = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
SmarThink 1.40 was linked to Nalimov TBS.
Have - you all - a nice weekend !
SilvianR
-
- Posts: 4465
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: Test no.4 (w32 - Nirvanachess 1.3 vs. SmarThink 1.40)
Conditions:
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Book = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
SmarThink 1.40 was linked to Nalimov TBS.
Test 3 (see the precedent post, please) + test 4 conclusion ------> Nirvanachess 1.3 w32 is over Bison 9.11 ! A fantastic progress !
Congratulations to its author !!!
Regards,
SilvianR
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Book = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
SmarThink 1.40 was linked to Nalimov TBS.
Test 3 (see the precedent post, please) + test 4 conclusion ------> Nirvanachess 1.3 w32 is over Bison 9.11 ! A fantastic progress !
Congratulations to its author !!!
Regards,
SilvianR
-
- Posts: 4465
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: Test no.5 (ProDeo 1.86 - comparative)
Hello folks !
Conditions:
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Book = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
Chess Tiger 2007.1 was linked to Nalimov TBS.
No comments !
SilvianR
Conditions:
-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Book = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
Chess Tiger 2007.1 was linked to Nalimov TBS.
No comments !
SilvianR
-
- Posts: 3232
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
- Full name: lucasart
Re: Test no.5 (ProDeo 1.86 - comparative)
Nobody can read these pictures you keep attaching to all your posts. Can you post the results in normal textual form instead?
Also, I'm curious about DiscoCheck 'w32'. Where did you get a 32-bit Windows compile? I wouldn't be surprised if this compile is broken and/or slow, as are most third party compiles.
Also, I'm curious about DiscoCheck 'w32'. Where did you get a 32-bit Windows compile? I wouldn't be surprised if this compile is broken and/or slow, as are most third party compiles.
Theory and practice sometimes clash. And when that happens, theory loses. Every single time.
-
- Posts: 4465
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: The responses
lucasart wrote: 1.-Nobody
2.-[nobody]can read these pictures you keep attaching to all your posts.
3.-Can you post the results in normal textual form instead?
4.-Also, I'm curious about DiscoCheck 'w32'. Where did you get a 32-bit Windows compile? I wouldn't be surprised if this compile is broken and/or slow, as are most third party compiles.
Hello Maestro !
1.-If "nobody" means just you, I'm sorry ! Weren't much complaints !
2.-They are just screen captures. You can:
-change the resolution of you monitor ; I use 1024x768 pixels;
-use a new monitor;
-ignore my captures/posts.
3.-Yes, but I love the captures. The images are important for me. I have a very good images memory.Think, at my 62 years old I keep in my memory the images of all the girls I sympathized along the years. And they were a lot !
4.-It is a 32-bit compile of Mr. Tony Mokonen. From here:
http://tmokonen.net84.net/
And works perfectly. I did a lot of tests. Of course , if a DiscoCheck w32 author's compile will appear I'll test it.
Until,
Regards,
SilvianR
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 3:36 pm
Re: The responses
If you are open to suggestions may I offer for your consideration the checking out of a screen capture utility such as Gadwin PrintScreen? It has options for the selecting of the area of a screen to be captured.
Then posted images that don't really need to be so large, don't have to be.
The company is still on the Internet but I prefer the older versions of PrintScreen.
A link from the archive.org site for the older freeware version 3.1. Stated to run on Windows 98/Me/2000/2003/XP, or Windows NT 4.0SP6. I don't know if this version runs on later Windows versions.
http://web.archive.org/web/200601101931 ... _Setup.exe
The archive.org link for the web page of this version:
http://web.archive.org/web/200601111404 ... intscreen/
And thank you for having posted about Tony Mokonen's 32bit compile of DiscoCheck:
http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 11&t=50006
Should you decide to give Gadwin PrintScreen a look it might seem complicated to get the sequence down to operate it, but it is fairly easy. It does have a help file.
Then posted images that don't really need to be so large, don't have to be.
The company is still on the Internet but I prefer the older versions of PrintScreen.
A link from the archive.org site for the older freeware version 3.1. Stated to run on Windows 98/Me/2000/2003/XP, or Windows NT 4.0SP6. I don't know if this version runs on later Windows versions.
http://web.archive.org/web/200601101931 ... _Setup.exe
The archive.org link for the web page of this version:
http://web.archive.org/web/200601111404 ... intscreen/
And thank you for having posted about Tony Mokonen's 32bit compile of DiscoCheck:
http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 11&t=50006
Should you decide to give Gadwin PrintScreen a look it might seem complicated to get the sequence down to operate it, but it is fairly easy. It does have a help file.
-
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:00 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
- Full name: Martin Sedlak
Re: The responses
What about Alt+PrintScreen?Charles Browne wrote:If you are open to suggestions may I offer for your consideration the checking out of a screen capture utility such as Gadwin PrintScreen? It has options for the selecting of the area of a screen to be captured.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 3:36 pm
Re: The responses
mar wrote: What about Alt+PrintScreen?
On my Windows XP Home version Alt+PrintScreen doesn't do anything but if that is an alternative, Great.
With the utility I was only suggesting, which I have used for years, with "Rectangular Area" chosen as the source in the program, a person would press the Hotkey once, and then starting at a corner of the desired capture hold down the left mouse button and pull the mouse over the area of the screen wanting to capture (the area chosen is then within an outline) and then let go of the left mouse button. Then while the mouse pointer is inside or outside of the area selected click the right mouse button once to have the utility capture the chosen area.