a question about Rybka...

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

pilgrimdan
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 10:49 pm

a question about Rybka...

Post by pilgrimdan »

if the code for Fruit had not been made available to the public...

how would Rybka (and other chess engines) be different today...
User avatar
hgm
Posts: 27787
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
Location: Amsterdam
Full name: H G Muller

Re: a question about Rybka...

Post by hgm »

Well, Fabien himself claimed that Fruit did not contain any tricks that were not publicly known before. But I guess Fruit opened the eyes of many people that some of these tricks could be made to work very well.
A Distel
Posts: 3618
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:33 pm

Re: a question about Rybka...

Post by A Distel »

pilgrimdan wrote:if the code for Fruit had not been made available to the public...

how would Rybka (and other chess engines) be different today...
What if Shakespeare had had a test audience for Romeo and Juliet or Hamlet?
bob
Posts: 20943
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: a question about Rybka...

Post by bob »

pilgrimdan wrote:if the code for Fruit had not been made available to the public...

how would Rybka (and other chess engines) be different today...
Hard to say. Seems like reverse-engineering is a pretty commonly practiced art in computer chess, based on the past couple of years of revelation.
User avatar
jshriver
Posts: 1342
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:41 pm
Location: Morgantown, WV, USA

Re: a question about Rybka...

Post by jshriver »

hgm wrote:Well, Fabien himself claimed that Fruit did not contain any tricks that were not publicly known before. But I guess Fruit opened the eyes of many people that some of these tricks could be made to work very well.
Wish this forum had a "like" function
User avatar
jshriver
Posts: 1342
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:41 pm
Location: Morgantown, WV, USA

Re: a question about Rybka...

Post by jshriver »

bob wrote: Hard to say. Seems like reverse-engineering is a pretty commonly practiced art in computer chess, based on the past couple of years of revelation.
This makes me paranoid for my own engine. I've written it all 100% from scratch, aside from the glue to the Gaviota egtb code. But since it's 0x80 based I still get paranoid due to "concept" cloning.

The fine line between outright cloning, and creation seems really gray. Once I publish olympus, is there a formal body I could send my code. Not that I'm as concerned about being blacklisted, I'd be curious of how things get rated.

Again I'm doing things 100% from scratch, and even gone so far as to not look at other peoples code. But still curious how just reading posts here, or looking at stats can change ones perspective.

-Josh
Daniel Shawul
Posts: 4185
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:34 am
Location: Ethiopia

Re: a question about Rybka...

Post by Daniel Shawul »

And now suddenly we have a flurry of EO discussions in the main forum. Many do not want to see this kind of post here which is why a separate forum is dedicated to it.