Bright 0.5c is now available from:
http://members.ziggo.nl/allard.siemelink/bright/
- all reported bugs fixed (frc, uci nps)
- eval/search refinements
- new book (creation) options,
- new default opening book (small)
Bright 0.5c released
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:30 pm
- Location: Netherlands
-
- Posts: 41428
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Bright 0.5c released
Hi Allard,
for 1CPU engines, would Spark 0.3 still be expected to have an edge over this latest Bright?
Cheers,
Graham.
for 1CPU engines, would Spark 0.3 still be expected to have an edge over this latest Bright?
Cheers,
Graham.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:30 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Bright 0.5c released
I think so, yes.Graham Banks wrote:Hi Allard,
for 1CPU engines, would Spark 0.3 still be expected to have an edge over this latest Bright?
Cheers,
Graham.
But you'd better tell me
-
- Posts: 41428
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Bright 0.5c released
I thought you might say that.Allard Siemelink wrote:I think so, yes.Graham Banks wrote:Hi Allard,
for 1CPU engines, would Spark 0.3 still be expected to have an edge over this latest Bright?
Cheers,
Graham.
But you'd better tell me
Thanks for your engines.
Cheers,
Graham.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 6640
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
Re: Bright 0.5c released
Bright-0.5c
by Allard Siemelink, Holland.
Strategic Test Suite Conditions:
Swami
by Allard Siemelink, Holland.
Strategic Test Suite Conditions:
Subject-wise Scores:Arena GUI
10 seconds per position
800 positions
Core2Quad 32 bits, Q6600, 2 GB RAM, 2.4GHZ
Engine uses 139 Mb Hash.
Engine uses 2 cores
Overall Performance:STS (v1.0) - Undermining:
86/100, Grade: S
STS (v2.1) - Open Files and Diagonals:
82/100, Grade: A+
STS (v3.0) - Knight Outposts/Centralization/Repositioning:
76/100, Grade: A
STS (v4.0) - Square Vacancy:
80/100, Grade: A+
STS (v5.0) - Bishop vs Knight:
73/100, Grade: A-
STS (v6.0) - Re-Capturing:
79/100, Grade: A
STS (v7.0) - Offer of Simplification:
73/100, Grade: A-
STS (v8.1) - Advancement of f/g/h Pawns:
65/100, Grade: B+
Regards,Total Score: 614/800
Overall Average: 76.75 %
Grade: A
Swami
Last edited by swami on Mon Jan 11, 2010 11:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:07 pm
- Full name: Herbert L
Re: Bright 0.5c released
Hi Allard,
downloadlink for spark0.3a/bright0.5c does not appear in Firefox 3.5.7
only older version 0.3
with IE i was able to download it.
Thanks for the great programs.
downloadlink for spark0.3a/bright0.5c does not appear in Firefox 3.5.7
only older version 0.3
with IE i was able to download it.
Thanks for the great programs.
-
- Posts: 6640
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
Re: Bright 0.5c released
Bright has a better understanding of "Open Files and Diagonals", and "Re-Capturing" than Spark.
-
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:07 pm
- Full name: Herbert L
Re: Bright 0.5c released
Now works with firefox too.
Another Question: why is the difference (in bytes) so big ?
spark-0.3a-vc64.exe ........... 366.592
spark-0.3a-vc64-mp.exe .. 3.251.200
spark-0.3a-gcc64.exe .........221.184
spark-0.3a-gcc64-mp.exe .. 229.376 is similar
Another Question: why is the difference (in bytes) so big ?
spark-0.3a-vc64.exe ........... 366.592
spark-0.3a-vc64-mp.exe .. 3.251.200
spark-0.3a-gcc64.exe .........221.184
spark-0.3a-gcc64-mp.exe .. 229.376 is similar
-
- Posts: 3533
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:33 pm
- Location: Antalya, Turkey
Re: Bright 0.5c released
Bright 05a (with 1cpu) got a slightly higher score than
Spark 03a (with 2cpu).
Very interesting comparison, indeed.
Best,
Spark 03a (with 2cpu).
Very interesting comparison, indeed.
Best,
hi, merhaba, hallo HT
-
- Posts: 6640
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
Re: Bright 0.5c released
Bright 0.5c used 2 CPU's in STS tests, so does Spark. (Read the conditions)beachknight wrote:Bright 05a (with 1cpu) got a slightly higher score than
Spark 03a (with 2cpu).
Very interesting comparison, indeed.
Best,
Perhaps I should now test gcc compile for Spark to see if it gets significantly better scores.