I strongly doubt this because the whole thing isn't an ongoing contract (which can be cancelled), but systematically a change of ownership, in this case of the copyright. You can't just call back your thing once you have given it away because then it isn't yours anymore. Otherwise, no perpetual change of ownership of anything would be possible, and you couldn't reliably buy anything, nor receive any gift.
In particular, it would prvent any economic usage of the copyright because any licencee would have to fear that the licence could be retracted at any point for no specific reason. That risk would prevent any further investment into the acquired rights. You wouldn't have any industry like print, music, film, or software.
The German copyright has an interesting paragraph (§42 UrhG) that an author can recall a licence if his opinion on the piece itself has changed to the point that further utilisation of the work would be unbearable for the author. Think of someone writing a book, and lateron, he changes his point of view drastically and regards the book as youthful folly damaging his current reputation. This right can be neither excluded contractually, nor can it be denied. However, the author needs to reimburse the licencee, and the cancellation becomes only valid if the author has paid or provided security for payment. The licencee in turn has only three months to tell the author what the damage is.
The fact that this paragraph even exists seems to suggest that an author can't recall a licence just like that because otherwise, this paragraph wouldn't be necessary.
