Is this hard ?

Discussion of chess software programming and technical issues.

Moderators: hgm, Harvey Williamson, bob

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
User avatar
xr_a_y
Posts: 729
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 1:28 pm
Location: France

Is this hard ?

Post by xr_a_y » Fri Jun 07, 2019 6:53 pm

Is this position hard for your engines ?

[d] 4B3/4kP2/8/6P1/6KP/8/8/5r2 w - - 1 67

Minic fails to find Kh5 and plays g6 instead, which leads to draw.

This is strange because Minic now has full KPK knowledge ...

Code: Select all

37 1323 13434 168185100 47 1251 45404   g5g6 e7f8 h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1g2 e8c6 g2g1 h5h6 g1f1 f5e5 f1f7 g6f7 f8f7 c6e8 f7f8 e8g6 f8g8 e5f6 g8h8 g6e8 h8h7 f6g5 h7g8 e8d7 g8f7 d7b5 f7g8 b5c4 g8h7 c4e6 h7h8 e6d5 h8h7 d5c4 h7h8 c4e6 h8h7

JohnWoe
Posts: 92
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:31 pm

Re: Is this hard ?

Post by JohnWoe » Fri Jun 07, 2019 7:20 pm

Tested Sapeli 1.19 ( dev version -> identical to 1.18 )

It finds Kh5 after 233,200,000 nodes and 56 seconds ( +6,17 ) later.
After 2,540,000,000 nodes and 9 minutes ( +11,16 ) still sticks to it. :P

Code: Select all

exclude: none best +tail                                          
dep	score	nodes	time	(not shown:  tbhits	knps	seldep)
 18	+11,16 	2,54G	9:07.96	Kh5 
 17	+11,04 	751,9M	2:50.14	Kh5 
 16	+10,92 	431,5M	1:40.59	Kh5 
 15	+6,17 	233,2M	0:56.25	Kh5 
 14	+2,97 	52,4M  	0:12.77	h5 
 13	+2,89 	24,6M  	0:06.34	h5 
 12	+2,86 	15,2M  	0:04.22	h5 
 11	+2,66 	4,52M  	0:01.47	g6 
 10	+2,65 	2,22M  	0:00.88	g6 
  9	+2,53 	943290	0:00.48	g6 
  8	+2,57 	329625	0:00.23	g6 
  7	+2,52 	113109	0:00.11	g6 
  6	+2,56 	56879  	0:00.07	g6 
  5	+2,43 	14958  	0:00.02	g6 
  4	+2,49 	6394    	0:00.01	g6 
  3	+2,41 	1770    	0:00.01	g6 
  2	+2,49 	924      	0:00.00	g6 
  1	+2,30 	218      	0:00.00	g6 
  0	# 
  

Dann Corbit
Posts: 9980
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:57 pm
Location: Redmond, WA USA
Contact:

Re: Is this hard ?

Post by Dann Corbit » Fri Jun 07, 2019 8:15 pm

xr_a_y wrote:
Fri Jun 07, 2019 6:53 pm
Minic fails to find Kh5 and plays g6 instead, which leads to draw.
Also, h5 is a mate in 18, so there are two winning moves.
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.

Dann Corbit
Posts: 9980
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:57 pm
Location: Redmond, WA USA
Contact:

Re: Is this hard ?

Post by Dann Corbit » Fri Jun 07, 2019 8:18 pm

Kh5 is a bit better, mate in 16
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.

User avatar
xr_a_y
Posts: 729
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 1:28 pm
Location: France

Re: Is this hard ?

Post by xr_a_y » Fri Jun 07, 2019 8:29 pm

I have just found again a bug in my incremental material update... So kpk is trigger when it should not...

Not enough testing... In french: le bug est toujours entre la chaise et le clavier... :oops:

Dann Corbit
Posts: 9980
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:57 pm
Location: Redmond, WA USA
Contact:

Re: Is this hard ?

Post by Dann Corbit » Fri Jun 07, 2019 9:45 pm

Si le débogage est le processus de suppression des bogues logiciels, la programmation doit être le processus de les mettre en.
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.

Ras
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 6:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Is this hard ?

Post by Ras » Sat Jun 08, 2019 1:38 am

My engine has this:

Code: Select all

  2/04	 0:00 	+4.78 	1.g6 Rg1+ 2.Kf5 Rg3 (908) 4  TB:4
  3/04	 0:00 	+4.79 	1.g6 Kd6 2.h5 Kd5 (1.552) 7  TB:10
  4/07	 0:00 	+4.84 	1.g6 Rg1+ 2.Kf5 Rh1 3.g7 Rf1+ 4.Kg6 (5.136) 23  TB:22
  5/07	 0:00 	+4.46 	1.g6 Rg1+ 2.Kf4 Rxg6 3.f8Q+ Kxf8 4.Bxg6 (15.311) 69  TB:62
  6/07	 0:00 	+4.46 	1.g6 Rg1+ 2.Kf4 Rxg6 3.f8Q+ Kxf8 4.Bxg6 (29.522) 128  TB:174
  7/11	 0:00 	+4.79 	1.g6 Rg1+ 2.Kf5 Rf1+ 3.Kg5 Rg1+ 4.Kh6 Rf1 5.g7 Rf6+ 6.Kg5 (65.161) 261  TB:462
  8/09	 0:00 	+5.20 	1.g6 Rg1+ 2.Kh5 Rg3 3.Kh6 Kf8 4.h5 Rg1 5.Bd7 (190.510) 606  TB:4.089
  9/11	 0:00 	+5.13 	1.g6 Rg1+ 2.Kf5 Rf1+ 3.Kg5 Rg1+ 4.Kh6 Kf8 5.h5 Rg2 6.Bc6 (356.095) 888  TB:10.215
 10/10	 0:00 	+5.07 	1.Kh5 Rg1 2.Kh6 Kf8 3.g6 Rg4 4.h5 Rg1 5.Bb5 Ke7 (1.344.668) 1492  TB:50.266
 11/12	 0:01 	+5.09 	1.Kh5 Kf8 2.Kh6 Rf4 3.h5 Rxf7 4.Bxf7 Kxf7 5.g6+ Kf8 6.Kg5 Kg7 (2.062.296) 1643  TB:100.533
 12/13	 0:02 	+6.32 	1.Kh5 Rh1 2.Kh6 Rxh4+ 3.Kg7 Rf4 4.g6 Rf1 5.Kg8 Rf4 6.g7 Rxf7 7.Bxf7 (4.200.524) 1817  TB:258.999
 13/13	 0:03 	+6.35 	1.Kh5 Rh1 2.Kh6 Rxh4+ 3.Kg7 Rf4 4.Kg8 Rf1 5.g6 Rf4 6.g7 Rxf7 7.Bxf7 (7.046.244) 1900  TB:561.127
 14/14	 0:07 	+9.61 	1.Kh5 Rh1 2.Kh6 Rxh4+ 3.Kg7 Rf4 4.Kg8 Rf1 5.g6 Rf4 6.g7 Ke6 7.f8Q Rg4 (15.136.049) 1957  TB:1.281.203
 15/15	 0:26 	+6.15 	1.Kh5 Rh1 2.Kh6 Rxh4+ 3.Kg7 Rf4 4.Kg8 Rf1 5.g6 Rf5 6.g7 Rxf7 7.Bxf7 Kf6 8.Bc4 (55.521.331) 2106  TB:9.766.064
 16/17	 0:36 	+9.94 	1.Kh5 Rh1 2.Kh6 Rxh4+ 3.Kg7 Rf4 4.Kg8 Rf1 5.g6 Rf2 6.g7 Ke6 7.f8Q Rb2 8.Kh8 Rh2+ 9.Kg8 (77.171.778) 2097  TB:11.861.160
Rasmus Althoff
https://www.ct800.net

jorose
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Full name: Jonathan Rosenthal

Re: Is this hard ?

Post by jorose » Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:45 am

Somehow Winter has one of the two correct moves for all depths, but Im not sure at what point Winter really understood it.

Code: Select all

position fen 4B3/4kP2/8/6P1/6KP/8/8/5r2 w - - 1 67
go infinite
info  depth 1 seldepth 2 time 0 nodes 18 nps 18000 score cp 176 pv h4h5
info  depth 2 seldepth 4 time 0 nodes 88 nps 88000 score cp 185 pv h4h5 f1g1
info  depth 3 seldepth 4 time 0 nodes 164 nps 164000 score cp 185 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5
info  depth 4 seldepth 5 time 1 nodes 310 nps 155000 score cp 186 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1
info  depth 5 seldepth 7 time 1 nodes 576 nps 288000 score cp 186 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5e5
info  depth 6 seldepth 8 time 2 nodes 1096 nps 365333 score cp 191 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g6 f1e1
info  depth 7 seldepth 10 time 4 nodes 1948 nps 389600 score cp 194 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g6 e7f8 h5h6
info  depth 8 seldepth 10 time 7 nodes 3235 nps 404375 score cp 206 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g6 e7f8 h5h6 f1d1
info  depth 9 seldepth 11 time 18 nodes 8415 nps 442894 score cp 269 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g6 f1a1 h5h6 a1a6 g6f5
info  depth 10 seldepth 13 time 24 nodes 11449 nps 457960 score cp 282 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g6 f1d1 h5h6 d1d6 g6g7 d6d5
info  depth 11 seldepth 18 time 46 nodes 25186 nps 535872 score cp 278 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g6 e7f8 g6h6 f8e7 g5g6 f1b1 e8c6
info  depth 12 seldepth 21 time 76 nodes 67723 nps 879519 score cp 293 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1d1 h5h6 d1d5 f5f4 d5d4 f4e5 d4g4 e5f5 g4h4
info  depth 13 seldepth 22 time 100 nodes 112475 nps 1113613 score cp 395 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g6 f1g1 h5h6 e7f8 h6h7 g1h1 e8a4 h1h3 a4b5
info  depth 14 seldepth 22 time 106 nodes 123518 nps 1154373 score cp 395 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g6 f1g1 h5h6 e7f8 h6h7 g1h1 e8a4 h1h3 a4b5 h3h4
info  depth 15 seldepth 24 time 116 nodes 145021 nps 1239495 score cp 395 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g6 f1g1 h5h6 e7f8 h6h7 g1h1 e8a4 h1h3 a4b5 h3h4 b5d3
info  depth 16 seldepth 24 time 125 nodes 166219 nps 1319198 score cp 395 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g6 f1g1 h5h6 e7f8 h6h7 g1h1 e8a4 h1h3 a4b5 h3h4 b5d3 h4h2
info  depth 17 seldepth 24 time 146 nodes 209547 nps 1425489 score cp 402 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g6 f1g1 h5h6 e7f8 h6h7 g1h1 e8a4 h1h3 a4b5 h3h4 b5d3 h4h2 d3e4
info  depth 18 seldepth 24 time 168 nodes 254544 nps 1506177 score cp 402 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g6 f1g1 h5h6 e7f8 h6h7 g1h1 e8a4 h1h3 a4b5 h3h4 b5d3 h4h2 d3e4 h2h4
info  depth 19 seldepth 28 time 346 nodes 620899 nps 1789334 score cp 527 pv h4h5 f1f2 h5h6 f2h2 g4f5 e7f8 f5g6 h2g2 h6h7 g2h2 e8b5 h2h4 b5e2 h4h7 g6h7 f8f7 e2c4 f7f8 h7g6
info  depth 20 seldepth 32 time 1348 nodes 2425248 nps 1797811 score cp 1616 pv h4h5 f1d1 g5g6 d1g1 g4f5 e7f8 f5f6 g1f1 f6g5 f1e1 g5h6 e1e8 f7e8q f8e8 g6g7 e8d8 g7g8q d8c7 g8d5 c7b6
info  depth 21 seldepth 32 time 1775 nodes 3213762 nps 1809550 score cp 1729 pv h4h5 f1d1 h5h6 d1f1 g5g6 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5e4 f1e1 e4d3 e1d1 d3e2 d1d6 g6g7 d6e6 e2f3 e6f6 f3g4 f6g6 g4h5
info  depth 22 seldepth 35 time 2358 nodes 4278737 nps 1813792 score cp 1784 pv h4h5 f1d1 h5h6 d1g1 g4f5 e7f8 f5g6 g1g3 h6h7 g3h3 e8b5 h3h2 b5d3 h2h7 g6h7 f8f7 d3c4 f7e7 g5g6 e7f6 g6g7 f6e5
info  depth 23 seldepth 35 time 3160 nodes 5674530 nps 1795169 score cp 1821 pv h4h5 f1d1 h5h6 d1g1 g4f5 e7f8 f5g6 g1g3 h6h7 g3h3 e8b5 h3h2 b5d3 h2h7 g6h7 f8f7 d3c4 f7e7 g5g6 e7f6 g6g7 f6e5 g7g8q
info  depth 24 seldepth 40 time 4094 nodes 7372791 nps 1800437 score cp 1850 pv h4h5 f1d1 h5h6 d1g1 g4f5 e7f8 f5g6 g1g3 h6h7 g3h3 e8b5 h3h2 b5d3 h2h4 d3e2 h4h7 g6h7 f8f7 e2c4 f7e7 g5g6 e7f6 g6g7 f6e5
info  depth 25 seldepth 40 time 6338 nodes 11389125 nps 1796675 score cp 1895 pv h4h5 f1d1 h5h6 d1g1 g4f5 e7f8 f5g6 g1g3 h6h7 g3h3 e8b5 h3h2 b5d3 h2h4 d3e2 h4h7 g6h7 f8f7 e2c4 f7e7 g5g6 e7f6 g6g7 f6e5 g7g8q
info  depth 26 seldepth 40 time 6959 nodes 12450001 nps 1788793 score cp 1895 pv h4h5 f1d1 h5h6 d1g1 g4f5 e7f8 f5g6 g1g3 h6h7 g3h3 e8b5 h3h2 b5d3 h2h4 d3e2 h4h7 g6h7 f8f7 e2c4 f7e7 g5g6 e7f6 g6g7 f6e5 g7g8q e5f4
info  depth 27 seldepth 45 time 11413 nodes 20033547 nps 1755173 score cp 1896 pv h4h5 f1f2 g5g6 f2g2 g4f5 e7f8 h5h6 g2f2 f5e5 f2e2 e5d4 e2g2 g6g7 g2g7 h6g7 f8g7 d4e4 g7f8 e4f5 f8e7 f5g6 e7f8 g6h7 f8e7 h7g7 e7e6 f7f8q
info  depth 28 seldepth 48 time 40405 nodes 63815450 nps 1579355 score cp 2937 pv h4h5 f1f2 g5g6 f2g2 g4f5 g2f2 f5g5 f2g2 g5h6 g2f2 g6g7 f2f7 e8f7 e7f7 h6h7 f7e6 h5h6 e6e5 g7g8q e5f4 h7g7 f4e4 h6h7 e4e3 h7h8q e3d2 g8a2 d2c3
info  depth 29 seldepth 48 time 55920 nodes 87146403 nps 1558384 score cp 2937 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g6 f1g1 h5h6 e7f8 h6h7 g1h1 e8b5 h1h4 b5e2 h4h7 g6h7 f8f7 e2c4 f7e7 g5g6 e7f6 g6g7 f6e5 g7g8q e5f4 g8d5 f4e3 d5e5 e3d2 e5d4
-Jonathan

Joost Buijs
Posts: 955
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:47 am
Location: Almere, The Netherlands

Re: Is this hard ?

Post by Joost Buijs » Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:31 am

Does not seem very hard, without TB my engine thinks within a millisecond h4-h5 is the best move, however it does not find a win. h4-h5 is solely played on positional grounds, at least that is my guess.

Code: Select all

info depth 1 score cp 324 time 0 nodes 86 nps 86 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f4
info depth 2 score cp 276 time 0 nodes 143 nps 143 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8
info depth 3 score cp 301 time 1 nodes 261 nps 261000 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1g1 g4f4
info depth 4 score cp 332 time 1 nodes 706 nps 706000 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1
info depth 5 score cp 369 time 2 nodes 2129 nps 1064500 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1f2 h6h7 f2g2 g4f4
info depth 6 score cp 382 time 3 nodes 3654 nps 1218000 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1f1 f5g6
info depth 7 score cp 406 time 4 nodes 8953 nps 2238250 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6
info depth 8 score cp 423 time 5 nodes 14315 nps 2863000 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1a1 g5g6 a1e1 h6h7 e1f1
info depth 9 score cp 409 time 7 nodes 21805 nps 3115000 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1a1 g5g6 a1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g5 f1g1 g5f6
info depth 10 score cp 412 time 9 nodes 29822 nps 3313555 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6 h2b2 h6h7 b2b6 g6h5
info depth 11 score cp 393 time 11 nodes 37356 nps 3396000 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6 h2b2 h6h7 b2b6 g6f5 f8g7
info depth 12 score cp 475 time 20 nodes 131356 nps 6567800 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6 h2b2 h6h7 b2h2 e8c6 h2h7 g6h7 f8f7
info depth 13 score cp 475 time 22 nodes 141771 nps 6444136 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6 h2b2 h6h7 b2h2 e8c6 h2h7 g6h7 f8f7
info depth 14 score cp 535 time 34 nodes 293481 nps 8631794 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6 h2b2 h6h7 b2h2 e8a4 h2h7 g6h7 f8f7 g5g6 f7f6
info depth 15 score cp 535 time 37 nodes 312534 nps 8446864 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6 h2b2 h6h7 b2h2 e8a4 h2h3 a4c6 h3h2 c6d5 h2h6 g6h6
info depth 16 score cp 535 time 41 nodes 343019 nps 8366317 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6 h2g2 h6h7 g2h2 e8a4 h2h3 a4c6 h3h7 g6h7 f8f7 g5g6 f7f6
info depth 17 score cp 644 time 66 nodes 651404 nps 9869757 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6 h2g2 h6h7 g2h2 e8b5 f8e7 g6g7 h2h7 g7h7 e7f7 g5g6 f7e7 g6g7
info depth 18 score cp 647 time 75 nodes 761710 nps 10156133 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6 h2g2 h6h7 g2h2 e8c6 h2h3 c6f3 h3h7 g6h7 f8f7 g5g6 f7e6 g6g7
With 6 piece TB enabled I expected to find a forced win, but somehow it does not. It probably means that on a short term there is no forced exchange to a won 6 piece TB position, so KPk won't help you either.

Code: Select all

info depth 1 score cp 324 time 0 nodes 86 nps 86 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f4
info depth 2 score cp 276 time 0 nodes 143 nps 143 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8
info depth 3 score cp 301 time 1 nodes 261 nps 261000 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1g1 g4f4
info depth 4 score cp 332 time 1 nodes 706 nps 706000 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1
info depth 5 score cp 369 time 16 nodes 2115 nps 132187 tbhits 2 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1f2 h6h7 f2g2 g4f4
info depth 6 score cp 382 time 18 nodes 3563 nps 197944 tbhits 7 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1f1 f5g6
info depth 7 score cp 406 time 21 nodes 7803 nps 371571 tbhits 25 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6
info depth 8 score cp 423 time 22 nodes 12604 nps 572909 tbhits 43 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1a1 g5g6 a1f1 f5e6 f1e1
info depth 9 score cp 409 time 25 nodes 18524 nps 740960 tbhits 82 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1a1 g5g6 a1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g5 f1g1 g5f6
info depth 10 score cp 393 time 28 nodes 26632 nps 951142 tbhits 135 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1g1 g4f5 g1h1 f5g6 h1b1 h6h7 b1b6 g6f5 f8g7
info depth 11 score cp 475 time 39 nodes 85365 nps 2188846 tbhits 473 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1g1 g4f5 g1h1 f5g6 h1b1 h6h7 b1h1 e8c6 h1h7 g6h7
info depth 12 score cp 475 time 42 nodes 94414 nps 2247952 tbhits 575 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1g1 g4f5 g1h1 f5g6 h1b1 h6h7 b1h1 e8c6 h1h7 g6h7 f8f7
info depth 13 score cp 510 time 53 nodes 163243 nps 3080056 tbhits 1263 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1g1 f5g6 g1g2 h6h7 g2h2 e8b5 h2h1 b5c4 h1h4
info depth 14 score cp 510 time 57 nodes 177978 nps 3122421 tbhits 1448 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6 h2g2 h6h7 g2h2 e8b5 h2h1 b5c4 h1h4
info depth 15 score cp 514 time 86 nodes 257499 nps 2994174 tbhits 2389 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6 h2g2 h6h7 g2h2 e8c6 h2h4 c6d5 h4h2 d5e4 h2h7 g6h7
info depth 16 score cp 513 time 93 nodes 280495 nps 3016075 tbhits 2726 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6 h2g2 h6h7 g2h2 e8c6 h2h4 c6d7 h4h7 g6h7 f8f7 g5g6 f7f6
info depth 17 score cp 513 time 100 nodes 308865 nps 3088650 tbhits 3173 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6 h2g2 h6h7 g2h2 e8c6 h2h4 c6d7 h4h1 d7c6 h1h4 c6d7 h4h1 d7c6
info depth 18 score cp 1223 time 330 nodes 1598545 nps 4844075 tbhits 20108 pv h4h5 e7f8 h5h6 f1h1 g4f5 h1h2 f5g6 h2g2 h6h7 g2h2 e8c6 h2h4 c6f3 h4h2 f3h5 h2h5 g6h5 f8e7 h7h8q e7f7

konsolas
Posts: 182
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:44 pm
Location: London
Full name: Vincent
Contact:

Re: Is this hard ?

Post by konsolas » Sun Jun 09, 2019 4:58 pm

Topple decides on h5 in a few ms and finds a mate a while later.

Code: Select all

info depth 5 seldepth 8 score cp 427 time 5 nodes 41736 nps 6956000 pv h4h5 f1g1 g4f5 g1f1 f5g6 e7e6 h5h6

Code: Select all

info depth 30 seldepth 56 score mate 19 time 423727 nodes 4387405243 nps 10354000 hashfull 999 tbhits 0 pv h4h5 f1f2 h5h
6 e7f8 g4h5 f2g2 h5g6 g2g3 h6h7 g3h3 e8c6 f8e7 g6g7 h3h7 g7h7 e7f7 g5g6 f7e7 g6g7 e7d6 c6f3 d6c5 g7g8q c5b4 g8c8 b4b3 c8
c5 b3b2 c5c4 b2b1 f3e4 b1b2 c4b4 b2c1 b4c3 c1d1 e4f3

Post Reply