Only in a PV node?
1. is without IID?
Time control?
IID (skipped when in check and Score greater than alpha)
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:24 pm
- Location: Hungary
-
- Posts: 27790
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: IID (skipped when in check and Score greater than alpha)
'Robust' means that it always works, even in pathological cases.AlvaroBegue wrote:I don't really know what you mean by robustness. How do you define it? And how do you measure it? (To be clear, these are not rhetorical questions: I genuinely want to know your answers.)
One way to measure it would be to take the worst ratio of the node counts of two subsequent iterations, on a large set of test positions. Large ratios indicate pathological situations (e.g. where it has to change PV).
-
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:46 pm
- Location: New York
- Full name: Álvaro Begué (RuyDos)
Re: IID (skipped when in check and Score greater than alpha)
That's a good idea. I should make a test for that so I can run it after every change.hgm wrote:'Robust' means that it always works, even in pathological cases.AlvaroBegue wrote:I don't really know what you mean by robustness. How do you define it? And how do you measure it? (To be clear, these are not rhetorical questions: I genuinely want to know your answers.)
One way to measure it would be to take the worst ratio of the node counts of two subsequent iterations, on a large set of test positions. Large ratios indicate pathological situations (e.g. where it has to change PV).
Thanks for the idea!