Today I put Bitfoot, my implementation of Clubfoot with bitboards, up on github:
https://github.com/zd3nik/Bitfoot
I haven't put up any binaries so you'll have to build it yourself if you want to try it out right away.
I'm not happy with the way I'm handling binaries for Clubfoot. So I'm looking for a better approach before putting up binaries for Bitfoot. I'd like to use github, but without including the binaries in the source project. So I'll be looking into what that will cost (if anything) and how well it integrates (automation etc). I'm open to suggestions if anyone has some.
STC
Introducing Bitfoot
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2015 3:34 am
- Location: United States
Re: Introducing Bitfoot
Well, that was easy...zd3nik wrote:I'm not happy with the way I'm handling binaries for Clubfoot. So I'm looking for a better approach before putting up binaries for Bitfoot. I'd like to use github, but without including the binaries in the source project. So I'll be looking into what that will cost (if anything) and how well it integrates (automation etc). I'm open to suggestions if anyone has some.
STC
https://github.com/zd3nik/Bitfoot/releases
I'll do a release with windows binaries when I get home (where my windows machine is).
STC
-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2015 3:34 am
- Location: United States
Re: Introducing Bitfoot
64-bit windows build has been added to the release. It will take some work (code changes) to get a 32-bit build for windows.
-
- Posts: 4833
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Philippines
Re: Introducing Bitfoot
Sample run from STS rating. STS rating = 2189, the engine estimated rating probably is close to this value in CCRL 40/4.zd3nik wrote:64-bit windows build has been added to the release. It will take some work (code changes) to get a 32-bit build for windows.
You did not send the id name and author correctly.
Code: Select all
id Bitfoot 1.0.1d7ae2a Shawn Chidester <zd3nik@gmail.com>
Code: Select all
id name Bitfoot 1.0.1d7ae2a
id author Shawn Chidester
Code: Select all
id email zd3nik@gmail.com
id country <string value>
Code: Select all
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
engine name
Hash: 128, Threads: 1, time/pos: 0.336s
Test duration: 00:06:21
Expected time to finish: 00:09:09
STS rating: 2189
STS ID STS1 STS2 STS3 STS4 STS5 STS6 STS7 STS8 STS9 STS10 STS11 STS12 STS13 STS14 STS15 ALL
NumPos 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1500
BestCnt 44 31 45 39 58 48 36 35 39 57 24 45 54 42 17 614
Score 534 433 600 547 673 719 496 468 504 675 382 562 651 552 397 8193
Score(%) 53.4 43.3 60.0 54.7 67.3 71.9 49.6 46.8 50.4 67.5 38.2 56.2 65.1 55.2 39.7 54.6
Rating 2135 1685 2429 2193 2754 2958 1965 1841 2001 2762 1458 2259 2656 2215 1525 2189
-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2015 3:34 am
- Location: United States
Re: Introducing Bitfoot
Thanks for taking the time to do that and give me some feedback. It's much appreciated! I've updated the source code to correctly respond to the uci command. I'll try to get updated binaries posted later tonight.Ferdy wrote:Sample run from STS rating. STS rating = 2189, the engine estimated rating probably is close to this value in CCRL 40/4.zd3nik wrote:64-bit windows build has been added to the release. It will take some work (code changes) to get a 32-bit build for windows.
You did not send the id name and author correctly.It should have been,Code: Select all
id Bitfoot 1.0.1d7ae2a Shawn Chidester <zd3nik@gmail.com>
Then perhaps you can add,Code: Select all
id name Bitfoot 1.0.1d7ae2a id author Shawn Chidester
To easily locate the contact address of the author and identify the country the engine represents for team creation.Code: Select all
id email zd3nik@gmail.com id country <string value>
Code: Select all
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz engine name Hash: 128, Threads: 1, time/pos: 0.336s Test duration: 00:06:21 Expected time to finish: 00:09:09 STS rating: 2189 STS ID STS1 STS2 STS3 STS4 STS5 STS6 STS7 STS8 STS9 STS10 STS11 STS12 STS13 STS14 STS15 ALL NumPos 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1500 BestCnt 44 31 45 39 58 48 36 35 39 57 24 45 54 42 17 614 Score 534 433 600 547 673 719 496 468 504 675 382 562 651 552 397 8193 Score(%) 53.4 43.3 60.0 54.7 67.3 71.9 49.6 46.8 50.4 67.5 38.2 56.2 65.1 55.2 39.7 54.6 Rating 2135 1685 2429 2193 2754 2958 1965 1841 2001 2762 1458 2259 2656 2215 1525 2189
I'm going to have to take a look at those test positions. Bitfoot's results are all over the map and quite a few are pretty lousy.
STC
-
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:24 am
- Location: Andorra
Re: Introducing Bitfoot
Hi!
32 bits compatible with windows xp and 64 bits compilation:
www.andscacs.com/bitfoot/bitfoot1.0.zip
32 bits compatible with windows xp and 64 bits compilation:
www.andscacs.com/bitfoot/bitfoot1.0.zip
Daniel José - http://www.andscacs.com