Ahh, my irony detector is ringing non-stop here..Daniel Shawul wrote:I can't believe you created another thread, when the 'problem with my otherwise acceptable post' stackOVERFLOW was that I created a new thread. Wasn't it easier to reply to the existing Lucas' post?? The double standard and absence of logic here is of the stone age.
An answer to Lucas' allegations
Moderators: hgm, Dann Corbit, Harvey Williamson
Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Re: An answer to Lucas' allegations
-
Daniel Shawul
- Posts: 4073
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:34 am
- Location: Ethiopia
- Contact:
Re: An answer to Lucas' allegations
Well it must be broken. 'No new non-programing threads', they say when deleting my stackOVEFLOW post, and then a day later here is a new non-programing thread created by the mods to praise/defend self.wgarvin wrote:Ahh, my irony detector is ringing non-stop here..Daniel Shawul wrote:I can't believe you created another thread, when the 'problem with my otherwise acceptable post' stackOVERFLOW was that I created a new thread. Wasn't it easier to reply to the existing Lucas' post?? The double standard and absence of logic here is of the stone age.