An answer to Lucas' allegations

Discussion of chess software programming and technical issues.

Moderators: hgm, Dann Corbit, Harvey Williamson

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
wgarvin
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: An answer to Lucas' allegations

Post by wgarvin » Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:41 pm

Daniel Shawul wrote:I can't believe you created another thread, when the 'problem with my otherwise acceptable post' stackOVERFLOW was that I created a new thread. Wasn't it easier to reply to the existing Lucas' post?? The double standard and absence of logic here is of the stone age.
Ahh, my irony detector is ringing non-stop here..

Daniel Shawul
Posts: 4073
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:34 am
Location: Ethiopia
Contact:

Re: An answer to Lucas' allegations

Post by Daniel Shawul » Mon Dec 23, 2013 9:15 pm

wgarvin wrote:
Daniel Shawul wrote:I can't believe you created another thread, when the 'problem with my otherwise acceptable post' stackOVERFLOW was that I created a new thread. Wasn't it easier to reply to the existing Lucas' post?? The double standard and absence of logic here is of the stone age.
Ahh, my irony detector is ringing non-stop here..
Well it must be broken. 'No new non-programing threads', they say when deleting my stackOVEFLOW post, and then a day later here is a new non-programing thread created by the mods to praise/defend self.

Post Reply