Go for a "mutual stalemate" record anyone?

Discussion of chess software programming and technical issues.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

rjgibert
Posts: 317
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:44 am

Go for a "mutual stalemate" record anyone?

Post by rjgibert »

At Tim Krabbe's excellent site:

http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess2/diary.htm

#361 discusses constructed game compositions ending in "mutual stalemate." The record is 36 ply. However, a close 2nd of 37 ply resulted in a mutual stalemate that ended in a symmetrical position.

Gik, mutual stalemate in 37 ply
Shakhmatyi i Matematika, 1983

1.e4 d5 2.e5 d4 3.c3 f6 4.Qf3 Kf7 5.Qxb7 Qd5 6.Kd1 Qxg2 7.Kc2 Qxf1 8.Qxc8 Qxg1 9.Qxb8 Rxb8 10.Rxg1 Rb3 11.Rg6 Ra3 12.Rh6 gxh6 13.bxa3 Kg7 14.Kb2 d3 15.e6 a5 16.h4 a4 17.h5 c5 18.f4 c4 19.f5 stalemate

With the aid of a symmetry constraint, it may just barely be possible that a new record may be within reach by a computer program specifically written for the task. Especially if a minimal symmetrical solution exists that is significantly shorter.

Any takers?
Michael Sherwin
Posts: 3196
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 3:00 am
Location: WY, USA
Full name: Michael Sherwin

Re: Go for a "mutual stalemate" record anyone?

Post by Michael Sherwin »

About your avatar.

I know the feeling.
If you are on a sidewalk and the covid goes beep beep
Just step aside or you might have a bit of heat
Covid covid runs through the town all day
Can the people ever change their ways
Sherwin the covid's after you
Sherwin if it catches you you're through