SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.1 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet for CCRL 40/15

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 41424
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.1 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet for CCRL 40/15

Post by Graham Banks »

gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 41424
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.1 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet for CCRL 40/15

Post by Graham Banks »

Code: Select all

CCRL 40/15 Rating List - Custom engine selection
1157654 games played by 2680 programs, run by 23 testers
Ponder off, General books (up to 12 moves), 3-4-5 piece EGTB
Time control: Equivalent to 40 moves in 15 minutes on an Intel i7-4770k.
Computed on June 27, 2020 with Bayeselo based on 1'157'654 games
Tested by CCRL team, 2005-2020, http://ccrl.chessdom.com/ccrl/4040/

Rank                 Engine                   Elo   +    -   Score  AvOp  Games
1 SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.1 64-bit 4CPU 3279  +22  -22  42.1%  +50.5   599
  SlowChess Blitz Classic 1.9 64-bit 4CPU 3181  +27  -27  53.3%  -18.6   383
gbanksnz at gmail.com
Dann Corbit
Posts: 12540
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
Location: Redmond, WA USA

Re: SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.1 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet for CCRL 40/15

Post by Dann Corbit »

That list is really interesting because in the other contest, Slowchess finished above Xiphos and Ethereal in the contest and in this contest both of those engines cleaned his clock.
This was a 4 CPU contest, so I wonder it Slowchess has a SMP problem.

Of course, it really isn't enough games to draw a firm conclusion of any kind.
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
jonkr
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:36 am
Full name: Jonathan Kreuzer

Re: SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.1 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet for CCRL 40/15

Post by jonkr »

The biggest reason is this test is not the latest version, it's 2.1 instead of 2.2

However my limited SMP test did suggest a possible minor weakness, it scored 11 elo worse against Xiphos 0.6 in my 4-thread test. (It was only 4000 games at 10s + 0.1s and even that took quite a while to run. Not enough games to say how much elo diff but enough to suggest it wasn't just pure luck. )