Page 1 of 1

SPCC: Testrun of Ethereal 11 finished

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2018 9:17 am
by pohl4711
Testrun of Ethereal 11 finished. Impressive!
First test of this fast climbing and interesting engine. So a short report: Ethereal played all 6000 games without crash, timeloss or any other problems in the LittleBlitzerGUI. And it is very strong. Clearly stronger than Fizbo 2 and Shredder 13. So, from now, Ethereal is one of the 5 opponents in my Stockfish-testruns (replaces Shredder)

https://www.sp-cc.de


(Perhaps you have to clear your browsercache or reload the website)

Code: Select all

Ethereal 11 pext       : 6000 (+866,=2920,-2214), 38.8 %
vs.
Stockfish 9 180201       : 1000 (+ 20,=417,-563), 22.9 %
Houdini 6 pext           : 1000 (+ 38,=433,-529), 25.4 %
Komodo 12 bmi2           : 1000 (+ 47,=472,-481), 28.3 %
Fire 7.1 popc            : 1000 (+146,=566,-288), 42.9 %
Fizbo 2 bmi2             : 1000 (+341,=468,-191), 57.5 %
Shredder 13 x64          : 1000 (+274,=564,-162), 55.6 %

Re: SPCC: Testrun of Ethereal 11 finished

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2018 10:13 am
by AndrewGrant
pohl4711 wrote:
Sat Sep 15, 2018 9:17 am
Testrun of Ethereal 11 finished. Impressive!
First test of this fast climbing and interesting engine. So a short report: Ethereal played all 6000 games without crash, timeloss or any other problems in the LittleBlitzerGUI. And it is very strong. Clearly stronger than Fizbo 2 and Shredder 13. So, from now, Ethereal is one of the 5 opponents in my Stockfish-testruns (replaces Shredder)

https://www.sp-cc.de


(Perhaps you have to clear your browsercache or reload the website)

Code: Select all

Ethereal 11 pext       : 6000 (+866,=2920,-2214), 38.8 %
vs.
Stockfish 9 180201       : 1000 (+ 20,=417,-563), 22.9 %
Houdini 6 pext           : 1000 (+ 38,=433,-529), 25.4 %
Komodo 12 bmi2           : 1000 (+ 47,=472,-481), 28.3 %
Fire 7.1 popc            : 1000 (+146,=566,-288), 42.9 %
Fizbo 2 bmi2             : 1000 (+341,=468,-191), 57.5 %
Shredder 13 x64          : 1000 (+274,=564,-162), 55.6 %
Thanks! Love seeing data.

Could you please refer to this version as "Ethereal 11.00", and not "Ethereal 11".

Cheers, Andrew Grant