TalkChess.com

Posted: **Wed Apr 25, 2018 10:39 am**

350 elo in 10 days.
I want to check the 10 days progress and how strong is LCZero in comparision with SF.

Posted: **Wed Apr 25, 2018 10:52 am**

First test:

LCZero ID173 vs. ID125, 2000 nodes (playouts) per move, 200 games:

   # PLAYER                  &#58;  RATING  ERROR  POINTS  PLAYED   (%)
   1 LC0 173_101eeb41 N2k    &#58;   150.6   37.7   140.5     200    70
   2 LC0 125_738edc3d N2k    &#58;     0.0   ----    59.5     200    30

White advantage = 6.29 +/- 20.59
Draw rate &#40;equal opponents&#41; = 50.00 % +/- 0.00

N2k is "nodes=2000"

Games

Posted: **Wed Apr 25, 2018 11:17 am**

LCZero ID125 (2000 nodes per move) vs. SF 130418 (depth=15):

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER                  &#58;  RATING  ERROR  POINTS  PLAYED   (%)
   1 Stockfish 130418 D15    &#58;   661.0  124.0   195.5     200    98
   2 LC0 125_738edc3d N2k    &#58;     0.0   ----     4.5     200     2

White advantage = 5.26 +/- 5.23
Draw rate &#40;equal opponents&#41; = 50.00 % +/- 0.00

Games

Posted: **Wed Apr 25, 2018 11:20 am**

LCZero ID173 (2000 nodes per move) vs. SF 130418 (depth=15):

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER                  &#58;  RATING  ERROR  POINTS  PLAYED   (%)
   1 Stockfish 130418 D15    &#58;   429.1   60.6   184.0     200    92
   2 LC0 173_101eeb41 N2k    &#58;     0.0   ----    16.0     200     8

White advantage = 21.05 +/- 22.44
Draw rate &#40;equal opponents&#41; = 50.00 % +/- 0.00

Games

Posted: **Wed Apr 25, 2018 12:18 pm**

LCZero ID173 (4000 nodes per move) vs. SF 130418 (depth=15):

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER                  &#58;  RATING  ERROR  POINTS  PLAYED   (%)
   1 Stockfish 130418 D15    &#58;   362.3   55.7   177.5     200    89
   2 LC0 173_101eeb41 N4k    &#58;     0.0   ----    22.5     200    11

White advantage = 13.18 +/- 27.67
Draw rate &#40;equal opponents&#41; = 50.00 % +/- 0.00

Games

Posted: **Wed Apr 25, 2018 1:34 pm**

Interesting! I would be curious to see a match with SF searching the same number of fixed nodes as well.

Posted: **Wed Apr 25, 2018 2:10 pm**

LCZero ID173 (1000 nodes per move) vs. SF 130418 (depth=15):

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER                  &#58;  RATING  ERROR  POINTS  PLAYED   (%)
   1 Stockfish 130418 D15    &#58;   468.7   69.0   187.0     200    94
   2 LC0 173_101eeb41 N1k    &#58;     0.0   ----    13.0     200     7

White advantage = 24.57 +/- 15.62
Draw rate &#40;equal opponents&#41; = 50.00 % +/- 0.00

Games

Posted: **Wed Apr 25, 2018 2:14 pm**

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER                  &#58;  RATING  ERROR  POINTS  PLAYED   (%)
   1 Stockfish 130418 D15    &#58;   661.4  128.9   379.5     400    95
   2 LC0 173_101eeb41 N2k    &#58;   233.0  135.6    16.0     200     8
   3 LC0 125_738edc3d N2k    &#58;     0.0   ----     4.5     200     2

White advantage = 13.15 +/- 6.01
Draw rate &#40;equal opponents&#41; = 50.00 % +/- 0.00

Posted: **Wed Apr 25, 2018 2:16 pm**

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER                  &#58;  RATING  ERROR  POINTS  PLAYED   (%)
   1 Stockfish 130418 D15    &#58;   474.4   68.7   548.5     600    91
   2 LC0 173_101eeb41 N4k    &#58;   106.0   85.9    22.5     200    11
   3 LC0 173_101eeb41 N2k    &#58;    39.5   94.0    16.0     200     8
   4 LC0 173_101eeb41 N1k    &#58;     0.0   ----    13.0     200     7

White advantage = 53.98 +/- 22.24
Draw rate &#40;equal opponents&#41; = 50.00 % +/- 0.00

Posted: **Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:55 pm**

Adding SF at depth=30:

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER                  &#58;  RATING  ERROR  POINTS  PLAYED   (%)
   1 Stockfish 130418 D30    &#58;   609.3  152.5    97.0     100    97
   2 Stockfish 130418 D15    &#58;     0.0   ----     3.0     100     3

White advantage = 7.01 +/- 12.90
Draw rate &#40;equal opponents&#41; = 50.00 % +/- 0.00

SF D15 has only 6 draw games.
Games will share after 200 games will finished.

TalkChess.com

LCZero progress

LCZero progress

Re: LCZero progress

Re: LCZero progress

Re: LCZero progress

Re: LCZero progress

Re: LCZero progress

Re: LCZero progress

Re: LCZero progress

Re: LCZero progress

Re: LCZero progress