SF130118

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

IWB
Posts: 1539
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm

SF130118

Post by IWB »

in case someone is interested:

http://www.inwoba.de/SF.html

SF8 got 76.9% against the same opponents and openings (see http://www.inwoba.de/bayes.html for details)

I use the Ultimaiq compile.

Best
Ingo
User avatar
Eelco de Groot
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:40 am
Full name:   

Re: SF130118

Post by Eelco de Groot »

Thanks for running the test Ingo!

I assume the test was stopped or connection was lost because at the moment the page is blank. Stopped after slightly over 600 games This was an intermediate result:

Code: Select all

SF

Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Houdini 6.02 (3349)		20.5	-	16.5	  55.41%		Perf=3386
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Komodo 11.2.2 (3318)	  20.5	-	15.5	  56.94%		Perf=3366
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Shredder 13 (3124)		 28.0	-	8.0		77.78%		Perf=3341
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Fizbo 2 (3096)		     30.0	-	7.0		81.08%		Perf=3348
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Ginkgo 2.0 (3066)		  32.5	-	4.5		87.84%		Perf=3409
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Gull 3 (3060)		      31.0	-	6.0		83.78%		Perf=3345
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Andscacs 0.92 (3050)	  34.5	-	3.5		90.79%		Perf=3447
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Booot 6.2 (3031)		   29.5	-	6.5		81.94%		Perf=3293
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Jonny 8.00 (3028)		  29.5	-	5.5		84.29%		Perf=3319
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Fritz 16 (3020)		    32.5	-	4.5		87.84%		Perf=3363
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Equinox 3.30 (3014)		31.5	-	6.5		82.89%		Perf=3288
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Chiron 4 (2994)		    31.0	-	6.0		83.78%		Perf=3279
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Critter 1.6a (2993)		29.0	-	8.0		78.38%		Perf=3216
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Nirvanachess 2.4 (2969)  32.5	-	4.5		87.84%		Perf=3312
Stockfish 130118 64 POPCNT - Hannibal 1.7 (2961)		32.5	-	4.5		87.84%		Perf=3304
		                                               445.0  -  107.0		80.62%		Perf=3318


552 out of 3300 games played
Level: 5 Minutes/Game + 3 sec/Move 
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
IWB
Posts: 1539
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm

Re: SF130118

Post by IWB »

Thx, its fixed (for now)

FTP was stuck for whatever reason. Restarted it and it was working imediately ... !?

Ingo
User avatar
Eelco de Groot
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:40 am
Full name:   

Re: SF130118

Post by Eelco de Groot »

... !?
Yes, it's working again Ingo :)
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
IWB
Posts: 1539
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm

Re: SF130118

Post by IWB »

Sorry the FTP is crashing continously. it runs for a few minutes and then it is gone again.

I will restart it from time to time and post the final result tomorrow.

Sorry again
Ingo
Jouni
Posts: 3278
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm

Re: SF130118

Post by Jouni »

Thanks for test. Obviously SF needs contempt 20 for Houdini rating.
Jouni
IWB
Posts: 1539
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm

Re: SF130118

Post by IWB »

Jouni wrote:Thanks for test. Obviously SF needs contempt 20 for Houdini rating.
... which might boost your toughest contenders ...
APassionForCriminalJustic
Posts: 417
Joined: Sat May 24, 2014 9:16 am

Re: SF130118

Post by APassionForCriminalJustic »

Jouni wrote:Thanks for test. Obviously SF needs contempt 20 for Houdini rating.
Stockfish doesn't need anything. It's already better than all of these engines including Houdini. The only thing that matters is match versus match rather than match percentage versus all engines. So with Houdini losing badly versus Stockfish if Houdini stays at the top of the list then it simply makes this rating list meaningless. The best engine should never lose a single match versus match percentage versus any engine.

Stockfish's rating should be about 3393 - whatever it scored against the over-hyped Houdini.
Last edited by APassionForCriminalJustic on Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
IWB
Posts: 1539
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm

Re: SF130118

Post by IWB »

APassionForCriminalJustic wrote:
Jouni wrote:Thanks for test. Obviously SF needs contempt 20 for Houdini rating.
Stockfish doesn't need anything. It's already better than all of these engines including Houdini. The only thing that matters is match versus match rather than match percentage versus all engines. So with Houdini losing badly versus Stockfish if Houdini stays at the top of the list then it simply makes this rating list meaningless.
Yea, who needs statistics and mathematcs. All fake news. Fxxx it!
User avatar
Guenther
Posts: 4605
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
Location: Regensburg, Germany
Full name: Guenther Simon

Re: SF130118

Post by Guenther »

IWB wrote:
APassionForCriminalJustic wrote:
Jouni wrote:Thanks for test. Obviously SF needs contempt 20 for Houdini rating.
Stockfish doesn't need anything. It's already better than all of these engines including Houdini. The only thing that matters is match versus match rather than match percentage versus all engines. So with Houdini losing badly versus Stockfish if Houdini stays at the top of the list then it simply makes this rating list meaningless.
Yea, who needs statistics and mathematcs. All fake news. Fxxx it!
Why test it all if the rating is known and fixed to 3393 according to criminalstats?
https://rwbc-chess.de

trollwatch:
Chessqueen + chessica + AlexChess + Eduard + Sylwy