TESTING DEEP SHREDDER 13 – 960 GAMES
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 14
Book: Perfect 2014c – Limit 5 moves. Sedat –
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 29.54
Knodes per second: 14.177
Fixed Time Control= 4+0
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X6 - Komodo 10.2 64-bit_X6_NOB 19.0 - 41.0 +4/=30/-26 31.67%
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X6 - SugaR 2.6 64 POPCNT_X6 23.0 - 37.0 +5/=36/-19 38.33%
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X6 - Houdini 5.01 Pro x64-popc_X6 17.0 - 43.0 +2/=30/-28 28.33%
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X6 - Gull 3 x64 XP_X6 39.5 - 20.5 +23/=33/-4 65.83%
Incremental Time Control 2+2
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X6 - Komodo 10.2 64-bit_X6_NOB 21.0 - 39.0 +5/=32/-23 35.00%
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X6 - SugaR 2.6 64 POPCNT_X6 18.0 - 42.0 +1/=34/-25 30.00%
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X6 - Houdini 5.01 Pro x64-popc_X6 14.5 - 45.5 +0/=29/-31 24.17%
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X6 - Gull 3 x64 XP_X6 34.5 - 25.5 +16/=37/-7 57.50%
480 Games= http://www.mediafire.com/file/a8fea80leqqf1e6/
Score using 6 cores= 186.5 – 293.5 = 38.85%
8 real cores
Ponder: Off
GUI: Fritz 14
Book: Perfect 2014c – Limit 5 moves. Sedat –
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Hash 1024
Relative Speed: 53.22
Knodes per Second: 25.543
Fixed Time Control= 4+0
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X8 - Komodo 10.2 64-bit_X8_NOB 21.0 - 39.0 +1/=40/-19 35.00%
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X8 - SugaR 2.6 64 BMI2_X8 21.5 - 38.5 +4/=35/-21 35.83%
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X8 - Houdini 5 Pro x64-pext_X8 17.0 - 43.0 +2/=30/-28 28.33%
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X8 - Gull 3 x64 BMI2_X8 36.5 - 23.5 +19/=35/-6 60.83%
Incremental Time Control 2+2
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X8 - Komodo 10.2 64-bit_X8_NOB 17.5 - 42.5 +3/=29/-28 29.17%
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X8 - SugaR 2.6 64 BMI2_X8 18.5 - 41.5 +3/=31/-26 30.83%
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X8 - Houdini 5 Pro x64-pext_X8 15.0 - 45.0 +1/=28/-31 25.00%
Deep Shredder 13 x64_X8 - Gull 3 x64 BMI2_X8 36.5 - 23.5 +18/=37/-5 60.83%
480 Games= http://www.mediafire.com/file/g013ssoq1jd402b
Score using 8 cores = 183.5 - 296.5= 38.23%
GLOBAL SCORE AFTER 960 GAMES: 370.0 – 590.0 = 38.54%
Average Elo of rivals= 3.247
Estimated ELO for Deep Shredder 13 = 3.167
Deep Shredder 13 against:
Komodo 10.2 (3277) = 32.71%
Sugar2.6 (3291) = 33.75%
Houdini 5 Pro (3316) = 26.46%
Gull 3 (3103) = 61.25%
Unfortunately I have not been able to find my previous tests with Deep Shredder 12, so that I can not compare the evolution of Shredder's.
Although still 168 Elo points below the top leading engine Stockfish 8, the evolution of Deep Shredder 13 is excellent. According to this test, it has performed 31 Elo points better than Houdini 4 Pro and 64 better than Gull 3.
Well done!
Regards,
Tom.
Testing Deep Shredder 13
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:30 am
Re: Testing Deep Shredder 13
Have you considered LazyGull? I noticed a 50 ELO points improvement, at very fast time controls, over Gull 3.Tomcats wrote:64 better than Gull 3
-
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:09 pm
Re: Testing Deep Shredder 13
I was not aware of this LazzyGull, Juan. I will try to find it. 50 Elo improvement sounds quite impressive to me.
Thanks for your advice.
Regards,
Tom.
Thanks for your advice.
Regards,
Tom.
-
- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:30 am
Re: Testing Deep Shredder 13
Look no further: LazyGull alpha 0.3 (latest one).
-
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:09 pm
-
- Posts: 12540
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Redmond, WA USA
Re: Testing Deep Shredder 13
I instantly get a segfault on starting up.
Same thing happens when I build it myself with pgo.
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.