Stockfish vs Komodo 9.4

[beram]

First results for Stockfish against the 'fresh lizard', under same conditions as my previous testmatches against Komodo 9.3.

Privat openingbook 25 lines, 2x 50 games; Pb off, Hash 512Mb
Komodo 9.4(with contempt=0)

51,18% for Stockfish150316
Although just my first 85 games, it seems that Komodo has become substantially stronger

Code: Select all

SF 150316 - Komodo 9.4(ct=0), Blitz 3m+2s
                                    
1   Stockfish 150316 64 BMI2    +8  +16/=55/-14 51.18%   43.5/85
2   Komodo 9.4 64-bit           -8  +14/=55/-16 48.82%   41.5/85

[beram]

52% for SF after my first full 100games, +20/=64/-16

Code: Select all

SF 150316 - Komodo 9.4(ct=0), Blitz 3m+2s
                                    
1   Stockfish 150316 64 BMI2   +14  +20/=64/-16 52.00%   52.0/100
2   Komodo 9.4 64-bit          -14  +16/=64/-20 48.00%   48.0/100

[JJJ]

Are you happy with these result Bram ?

[beram]

52% for SF after my first full 100games, +20/=64/-16

Code: Select all

SF 150316 - Komodo 9.4(ct=0), Blitz 3m+2s
                                    
1   Stockfish 150316 64 BMI2   +14  +20/=64/-16 52.00%   52.0/100
2   Komodo 9.4 64-bit          -14  +16/=64/-20 48.00%   48.0/100

Second 100 games 54,5% for SF.
So combined after 200 games 53,25% for SF

@Jean Baptiste: I am happy, but are you?

Code: Select all

SF 150316 - Komodo 9.4(ct=0), Blitz 3m+ 2s                                    
1   Stockfish 150316 64 BMI2   +31  +25/=59/-16 54.50%   54.5/100
2   Komodo 9.4 64-bit          -31  +16/=59/-25 45.50%   45.5/100

SF 150316 - Komodo 9.4(ct=0), Blitz 3m+ 2s                                    
1   Stockfish 150316 64 BMI2   +23  +45/=123/-32 53.25%  106.5/200
2   Komodo 9.4 64-bit          -23  +32/=123/-45 46.75%   93.5/200

[APassionForCriminalJustic]

52% for SF after my first full 100games, +20/=64/-16

Code: Select all

SF 150316 - Komodo 9.4(ct=0), Blitz 3m+2s
                                    
1   Stockfish 150316 64 BMI2   +14  +20/=64/-16 52.00%   52.0/100
2   Komodo 9.4 64-bit          -14  +16/=64/-20 48.00%   48.0/100

Second 100 games 54,5% for SF.
So combined after 200 games 53,25% for SF

@Jean Baptiste: I am happy, but are you?

Code: Select all

SF 150316 - Komodo 9.4(ct=0), Blitz 3m+ 2s                                    
1   Stockfish 150316 64 BMI2   +31  +25/=59/-16 54.50%   54.5/100
2   Komodo 9.4 64-bit          -31  +16/=59/-25 45.50%   45.5/100

SF 150316 - Komodo 9.4(ct=0), Blitz 3m+ 2s                                    
1   Stockfish 150316 64 BMI2   +23  +45/=123/-32 53.25%  106.5/200
2   Komodo 9.4 64-bit          -23  +32/=123/-45 46.75%   93.5/200

Bram, you should download Komodo 9.41. There was a significant bug regressing Komodo by at least five ELO points.

[JJJ]

Well, I will be when you ll test Komodo 9.41

[JJJ]

In fact, you should even wait for Komodo 9.42 as far I understood.

[beram]

In fact, you should even wait for Komodo 9.42 as far I understood.

Well, i have allready 150 games now at same TC 3m2s and same other conditions
In fact, sofar Komodo 9.42 is doing worse
55,3% for Stockfish +33 =100 -17

[beram]

In fact, you should even wait for Komodo 9.42 as far I understood.

Well, i have allready 150 games now at same TC 3m2s and same other conditions
In fact, sofar Komodo 9.42 is doing worse
55,3% for Stockfish +33 =100 -17

After 200 games 55,75% for SF 150316 against Komodo 9.42(with contempt=0)
+44 =135 -21, with 67,5% drawpercentage

Code: Select all

SF 150316 - Komodo 9.4(ct=0), Blitz 3m+2s
                                    
1   Stockfish 150316 64 BMI2   +40  +44/=135/-21 55.75%  111.5/200
2   Komodo 9.42 64-bit         -40  +21/=135/-44 44.25%   88.5/200

At same time I have allready 50 games on AMD1090T 4core each at TC15m10s SF020316 against Komodo 9.42(with contempt=0)
52% for SF 020316
+9 =34 -7, with 68% drawpercentage
26 games before with Komodo 9.4 at same PC +5 =17 -4 for SF 020316

I let it run for another 50 games to see the outcome and have a comparison over 100 games between SF020316 vs K9.3 and K9.42
SF020316 against Komodo 9.3 scored 58% at same TC 15m10s 4cores

[APassionForCriminalJustic]

In fact, you should even wait for Komodo 9.42 as far I understood.

Well, i have allready 150 games now at same TC 3m2s and same other conditions
In fact, sofar Komodo 9.42 is doing worse
55,3% for Stockfish +33 =100 -17

After 200 games 55,75% for SF 150316 against Komodo 9.42(with contempt=0)
+44 =135 -21, with 67,5% drawpercentage

Code: Select all

SF 150316 - Komodo 9.4(ct=0), Blitz 3m+2s
                                    
1   Stockfish 150316 64 BMI2   +40  +44/=135/-21 55.75%  111.5/200
2   Komodo 9.42 64-bit         -40  +21/=135/-44 44.25%   88.5/200

At same time I have allready 50 games on AMD1090T 4core each at TC15m10s SF020316 against Komodo 9.42(with contempt=0)
52% for SF 020316
+9 =34 -7, with 68% drawpercentage
26 games before with Komodo 9.4 at same PC +5 =17 -4 for SF 020316

I let it run for another 50 games to see the outcome and have a comparison over 100 games between SF020316 vs K9.3 and K9.42
SF020316 against Komodo 9.3 scored 58% at same TC 15m10s 4cores

Certainly for your hardware and CPU Stockfish looks to be better.