Page 1 of 5
Komodo 9.3 vs Stockfish
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2015 11:47 am
by beram
First test with Komodo 9.3 is done with one of the strongest latest Stockfish compiles SF 121115IP (Ipman compile)
SF came out as a winner but +20 - 16 is pretty close I would say
Privat testbook of 25 positions 2 runs 100games
Both engines with standard setting, 512 Mb Hash, ponder off
Code: Select all
SF 121115IP - Komodo 9.3 Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 SF 121115IP 64 BMI2 +14 +20/=64/-16 52.00% 52.0/100
2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -14 +16/=64/-20 48.00% 48.0/100
earlier result of Komodo 9.2(ct=0) against SF 121115 was a 60% win and a record for a SFdev against Komodo 9.2(ct=0) under these conditions
(
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 71&t=57871)
Re: Komodo 9.3 vs Stockfish
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2015 7:41 pm
by Kaj Soderberg
So is this particular ipman compile available somewhere?
I found quite a few from ipman on the net, but not this one.
Would be nice to play around with it.
Re: Komodo 9.3 vs Stockfish
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2015 9:44 pm
by beram
Kaj Soderberg wrote:So is this particular ipman compile available somewhere?
I found quite a few from ipman on the net, but not this one.
Would be nice to play around with it.
I found it on XXX:
http://XXX
Re: Komodo 9.3 vs Stockfish
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2015 12:35 am
by Nathanael Russell
Author Ipman
Stockfish 121115IP x32 gen
Stockfish 121115IP x32 old
Stockfish 121115IP x32 sse
Stockfish 121115IP x64 bmi2
Stockfish 121115IP x64 gen
Stockfish 121115IP x64 pop
Stockfish 121115IP x64 sse
Code: Select all
https://mega.nz/#!Kdoz0IAC!2FCNIlJsn8x_UlpuZGCExwHxzCbZb3_PibgLVk_nBOA
Re: Komodo 9.3 vs Stockfish
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:43 am
by beram
beram wrote:First test with Komodo 9.3 is done with one of the strongest latest Stockfish compiles SF 121115IP (Ipman compile)
SF came out as a winner but +20 - 16 is pretty close I would say
Privat testbook of 25 positions 2 runs 100games
Both engines with standard setting, 512 Mb Hash, ponder off
Code: Select all
SF 121115IP - Komodo 9.3 Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 SF 121115IP 64 BMI2 +14 +20/=64/-16 52.00% 52.0/100
2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -14 +16/=64/-20 48.00% 48.0/100
earlier result of Komodo 9.2(ct=0) against SF 121115 was a 60% win and a record for a SFdev against Komodo 9.2(ct=0) under these conditions
(
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 71&t=57871)
Second test with Komodo 9.3 with contempt=0 setting
51% for SF 121115IP
Code: Select all
SF 121115IP - Komodo 9.3(ct=0) Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 SF 121115IP 64 BMI2 +7 +21/=60/-19 51.00% 51.0/100
2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -7 +19/=60/-21 49.00% 49.0/100
Re: Komodo 9.3 vs Stockfish
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:51 am
by shrapnel
Blitz games ? Gimme a break !
Everyone knows that Komodo can only beat Stockfish in 30 Minutes games and above.
Anything shorter, and Stockfish will win always.
Pointless testing.
Re: Komodo 9.3 vs Stockfish
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:03 pm
by WuShock
Blitz games ? Gimme a break !
Everyone knows that Komodo can only beat Stockfish in 30 Minutes games and above.
Anything shorter, and Stockfish will win always.
Pointless testing.
Gimme a break .......... cut out your nasty comments .......
Thank you , that is all ..........
Re: Komodo 9.3 vs Stockfish
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:42 pm
by stavros
shrapnel wrote:Blitz games ? Gimme a break !
Everyone knows that Komodo can only beat Stockfish in 30 Minutes games and above.
Anything shorter, and Stockfish will win always.
Pointless testing.
firt of all sf 7 its not out yet and wont soon.
blitz and rapid its not chess? lol, how ru considering the "best engine"?
do i need specific time control,hardware etc?
iam considering a "best engine" at any time control,hardware ,os etc.
Re: Komodo 9.3 vs Stockfish
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 12:22 pm
by beram
beram wrote:beram wrote:First test with Komodo 9.3 is done with one of the strongest latest Stockfish compiles SF 121115IP (Ipman compile)
SF came out as a winner but +20 - 16 is pretty close I would say
Privat testbook of 25 positions 2 runs 100games
Both engines with standard setting, 512 Mb Hash, ponder off
Code: Select all
SF 121115IP - Komodo 9.3 Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 SF 121115IP 64 BMI2 +14 +20/=64/-16 52.00% 52.0/100
2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -14 +16/=64/-20 48.00% 48.0/100
earlier result of Komodo 9.2(ct=0) against SF 121115 was a 60% win and a record for a SFdev against Komodo 9.2(ct=0) under these conditions
(
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 71&t=57871)
Second test with Komodo 9.3 with contempt=0 setting
51% for SF 121115IP
Code: Select all
SF 121115IP - Komodo 9.3(ct=0) Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 SF 121115IP 64 BMI2 +7 +21/=60/-19 51.00% 51.0/100
2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -7 +19/=60/-21 49.00% 49.0/100
And a third test on my AMD X6 1090T with 4 cores and same openingsbook
gives a 53% win for SF 121115IP with a high 72% draw percentage
Code: Select all
SF 121115IP - Komodo 9.3(ct=0), Blitz 3m2s
1 SF 121115IP 64 +21 +17/=72/-11 53.00% 53.0/100
2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -21 +11/=72/-17 47.00% 47.0/100
Re: Komodo 9.3 vs Stockfish
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:26 pm
by Modern Times
Seems that on the hardware that 99% of us can afford and run, Stockfish is stronger in game-play. But on TCEC like hardware, with long time control, the tables are turned. For analysis purposes that makes Komodo the weapon of choice, but if you are serious about things you'll use at least one other engine as well.