TCERL - (Top Chess Engines Rating List)

PaulieD · Post by **PaulieD** » Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:31 pm

Mars 3.37 ( the latest version) testing is underway.

1000 SF STC games shows promise of an increase.

PaulieD · Post by **PaulieD** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:40 pm

Mars 3.37 testing is complete.
10 Elo increase

https://tcerl.wordpress.com

PaulieD · Post by **PaulieD** » Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:50 pm

SF 190215 BYO474 vs K8 updated

https://tcerl.wordpress.com

PaulieD · Post by **PaulieD** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 10:02 pm

SugaR v5.1 testing is underway

PaulieD · Post by **PaulieD** » Sat Feb 28, 2015 1:02 pm

SugaR v51 is the new Number 1 engine for TCERL !!

Congrats Marco...GREAT JOB!!!

https://tcerl.wordpress.com/rating-list-2/

PaulieD · Post by **PaulieD** » Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:26 pm

There is a new TCERL list including Komodo 9

https://tcerl.wordpress.com/rating-list-2/

IWB · Post by **IWB** » Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:12 pm

PaulieD wrote:A new rating list is now available:

https://tcerl.wordpress.com/

Ohoh, poor Komodo, against how many Littos or things derived from there or things where Litto is derived from is it matched in that list?
And try to reproduce that with Ponder on. I can see at least 3 engines who are not fit to run that test without a crash rate higher than 3% (which makes them impossible to play automaticaly, even just 1% is a pain in the neck to play)

Besides that: Take care, doing that sort of thing is addictive!

Regards
Ingo

PaulieD · Post by **PaulieD** » Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:17 pm

No crash rates, I use cutechess-cli.
Sorry my results were different than yours. Your list is loaded with derivatves also. No time losses for me...sorry

Frank Quisinsky · Post by **Frank Quisinsky** » Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:26 pm

Hi Paul,

oll is OK, different ideas to create such a Rating list is all the time interesting. Also for older people in testing with an other view.

I think that are the first results looks normaly for me.
+50 is to high for Komodo 9 ... on the other Hand +-10 after selection of participants (more important is quantity of games) is OK.

I have interest on the Mars games.
I will analyze the games a bit, perhaps the style is today an other as all the IPs have. Equinox is a good example because the style is today an own, same for latest Fire ... clearly to see in stats.

Congratulations for your work.
I like it ... also in case that I don't like Rybka and Houdini.

Mars could be interesting for me but I will checked the style and compare a bit with IPP results I have (not public in my list).

Best
Frank

IWB · Post by **IWB** » Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:27 pm

PaulieD wrote:No crash rates, I use cutechess-cli.
Sorry my results were different than yours. Your list is loaded with derivatves also. No time losses for me...sorry

It is not a matter of "beeing a different list", actualy I would expect that seeing the different setup, I was talking about Ponder ON and that many of your listed engines are not able to do that properly so that a Ponder ON testrun can be automated.

And then it is not a time loss, but an engine crash and many times it takes down everything it can grab

No doubt there are some derivates in my list, it is more the sheer amount of them which jumps into the eye.

Anyhow, have fun and take care, this can eat up all your time!

Regards
Ingo

TCERL - (Top Chess Engines Rating List)

Re: TCERL - (Top Chess Engines Rating List)

Re: TCERL - (Top Chess Engines Rating List)

Re: TCERL - (Top Chess Engines Rating List)

Re: TCERL - (Top Chess Engines Rating List)

Re: TCERL - (Top Chess Engines Rating List)

Re: TCERL - (Top Chess Engines Rating List)

Re: TCERL - (Top Chess Engines Rating List)

Re: TCERL - (Top Chess Engines Rating List)

Re: TCERL - (Top Chess Engines Rating List)

Re: TCERL - (Top Chess Engines Rating List)