Test no.1 (DiscoCheck w32 comparative)

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: bob, hgm, Harvey Williamson

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 3358
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:19 pm
Location: IASI (Romania) - the historical capital of MOLDOVA

Re: Carballo 1.7 w32 comparative test

Post by Sylwy » Sat Nov 19, 2016 9:44 pm

Günther Höhne wrote:Thanks, I have selected the Windows batch file (.bat) from Carballo.
I can load the engine options, but the engine shows 0mb hash and works not.
Do you have an idea?

Regards
Günther
Maybe you need to update with the newest Java version ?!?

User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 3358
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:19 pm
Location: IASI (Romania) - the historical capital of MOLDOVA

Re: Galjoen 0.33 w32 comparative test

Post by Sylwy » Sat Dec 10, 2016 6:43 pm

Hello !

Conditions:

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 64 MB
-Book = its own book (for Galjoen 0.33) & Perfect_2010.abk for Frank-Walter 1.08
-GUI = Arena 3.0
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3

Image

Image

User avatar
Werner Taelemans
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:57 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Re: Galjoen 0.33 w32 comparative test

Post by Werner Taelemans » Sat Dec 10, 2016 8:53 pm

Thanks for the test.
Galjoen v0.33 seems a bit stronger than v0.32.5 here.
That's what I expected when I released it.
When you use it with "own book" on, it doesn't suffer from the WB-bug.

Michael Sherwin
Posts: 3041
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 1:00 am
Location: WY, USA
Full name: Michael Sherwin

Re: Test no.1 (DiscoCheck w32 comparative)

Post by Michael Sherwin » Tue Dec 13, 2016 8:02 pm

Hey Ruxy, did you ever test how much elo the learning engines gained on non learning engines after that mega learning tournament?

From time to time I search RomiChess here at talkchess and this topic is always at the top but there is never anything new about RomiChess so I no longer look inside. I imagine that other engine authors give up looking after a while also. So if you do revisit an engine the author might not ever know. I know this topic is your castle but the guards at the gate are so rough to make me not want to visit!
I hate if statements. Pawns demand if statements. Therefore I hate pawns.

User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 3358
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:19 pm
Location: IASI (Romania) - the historical capital of MOLDOVA

Re: Nemeton 1.5 comparative test

Post by Sylwy » Fri Jan 06, 2017 5:22 pm

Hello !

Conditions:

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Perfect_2010.abk & its own book for Nemeton 1.2 - 1.3 - 1.4 - 1.5
-GUI = Arena 3.0
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3

The best Nemeton ever !

Image

Image

Image

Image

Stan Arts
Posts: 179
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 9:53 pm
Location: the Netherlands

Re: Nemeton 1.5 comparative test

Post by Stan Arts » Fri Jan 06, 2017 9:04 pm

Woohoo finally the Ruxy spell has been broken! :)

User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 3358
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:19 pm
Location: IASI (Romania) - the historical capital of MOLDOVA

Re: Andscacs 0.89 w32 comparative test

Post by Sylwy » Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:23 pm

Hello !

Conditions:

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3

Shredder 12 UCI used Nalimov TBs & Shredderbases (loaded into the RAM memory).
I used Andscacs 0.88 & 0.89 versions without Syzygy Bases access.

Image

Image

User avatar
cdani
Posts: 2104
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:24 am
Location: Andorra
Contact:

Re: Andscacs 0.89 w32 comparative test

Post by cdani » Mon Jan 09, 2017 9:04 pm

Thanks for the test!! :-)

User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 3358
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:19 pm
Location: IASI (Romania) - the historical capital of MOLDOVA

Re: Ethereal 8.00 w32 test

Post by Sylwy » Wed Jan 11, 2017 6:21 pm

Hello !

Conditions:

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Book = Perfect_2010.abk
-GUI = Arena 3.0
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3

Ethereal 8.00 w32 has around 2.540 Elo CCRL 4/40.

Image

User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 3358
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:19 pm
Location: IASI (Romania) - the historical capital of MOLDOVA

Re: Chiron 4 w32 comparative test

Post by Sylwy » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:35 pm

Conditions :

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Book = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+

Chiron 3 & 4 were linked to Syzygy Bases.
Naum 4.6 was linked to Nalimov TBs.

A superb progress of this new version of Chiron !

Image

Image

Post Reply