Stockfish_0308 vs Komodo5.1MP and Houdini 3

beram · Post by **beram** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 8:05 pm

Well it looks like the latest Stockfish 0308 really surpasses Komodo 5.1MP
I had this on my system: AMD X6 1090T 3200 Mhz

Code: Select all

Bram Testsuite 2.0 - 50 games, TC 4m 2s, each engine 4CPU, ponder off

Stockfish 030813 64 SSE4.2   - Houdini 3 x64                  23.0 - 27.0    +13/=20/-17   46.00%
Stockfish 030813 64 SSE4.2   - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bit            29.0 - 21.0    +15/=28/-7    58.00%

Code: Select all

Noomentestsuite 2012, 60 games, TC 4m 2s, each engine 4CPU, ponder off
                                
1   Stockfish 030813 64 SSE4.2  +17/=34/-9 56.67%   34.0/60
2   Komodo 5.1r2 64-bit         +9/=34/-17 43.33%   26.0/60

Code: Select all

Noomentestsuite 2012, 60 games, TC 4m+2s, 4CPU, ponder off
                                
1   Houdini 3 x64               +18/=31/-11 55.83%   33.5/60
2   Stockfish 030813 64 SSE4.2  +11/=31/-18 44.17%   26.5/60

so in total I got this with ELOstat

Code: Select all

Program                            Score     %    Av.Op.  Elo    +   -    Draws

  1 Houdini 3 x64                  &#58;  60.5/110  55.0   3004   3039   48  48   46.4 %
  2 Stockfish 030813 64 SSE4.2     &#58; 112.5/220  51.1   2996   3004   32  32   51.4 %
  3 Komodo 5.1r2 64-bit            &#58;  47.0/110  42.7   3004   2953   43  43   56.4 %

Individual statistics:

Code: Select all

Individual statistics&#58;

1 Houdini 3 x64             &#58; 3039  110 (+ 35,= 51,- 24&#41;, 55.0 %

Stockfish 030813 64 SSE4.2    &#58; 110 (+ 35,= 51,- 24&#41;, 55.0 %

2 Stockfish 030813 64 SSE4.2&#58; 3004  220 (+ 56,=113,- 51&#41;, 51.1 %

Houdini 3 x64                 &#58; 110 (+ 24,= 51,- 35&#41;, 45.0 %
Komodo 5.1r2 64-bit           &#58; 110 (+ 32,= 62,- 16&#41;, 57.3 %

3 Komodo 5.1r2 64-bit       &#58; 2953  110 (+ 16,= 62,- 32&#41;, 42.7 %

Stockfish 030813 64 SSE4.2    &#58; 110 (+ 16,= 62,- 32&#41;, 42.7 %

Lyudmil Tsvetkov · Post by **Lyudmil Tsvetkov** » Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:10 pm

If Stock_2907 is better than Stock_2707 some 7 elos (according to Pohl), I do not know what to expect from Stock_0508 (if there is such a version).
7 elos in 2 days, 3 elos per day (and some 0.15 elo per hour), that means that Stcok will be N1 in about 20 days

beram · Post by **beram** » Fri Aug 09, 2013 7:12 pm

I am now running a new match with same privat testsuite both 4CPU but now with TC 20m 10s
Stockfish 0308 - Komodo 5.1r2 after 22 of 50 games: +5 =13 -4

beram · Post by **beram** » Sat Aug 10, 2013 11:58 am

beram wrote:I am now running a new match with same privat testsuite both 4CPU but now with TC 20m 10s
Stockfish 0308 - Komodo 5.1r2 after 22 of 50 games: +5 =13 -4

and after 40 games +9 =25 -6 = 53,8%
Stockfish 0308 plays impressive

beram · Post by **beram** » Sun Aug 11, 2013 12:52 am

beram wrote:
beram wrote:I am now running a new match with same privat testsuite both 4CPU but now with TC 20m 10s
Stockfish 0308 - Komodo 5.1r2 after 22 of 50 games: +5 =13 -4
and after 40 games +9 =25 -6 = 53,8%
Stockfish 0308 plays impressive

End result

Code: Select all

Stockfish 030813 64 SSE4.2 - Komodo5.1, Blitz 20m+10s
                                
1   Stockfish 030813 64 SSE4.2  +12/=28/-10 52.00%   26.0/50
2   Komodo 5.1r2 64-bit         +10/=28/-12 48.00%   24.0/50

PaulieD · Post by **PaulieD** » Sun Aug 11, 2013 4:24 am

Thank you for this new time control test.
I think you will find that Stockfish 100813 is even stronger!

beram · Post by **beram** » Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:23 am

Stockfish won two times a position from both sides of the board. SF seems to be more aggressively playing for initiative.
Strong point of Komodo (as been known) is his more solid, positionally style and his ability to play good with unbalanced pieces, though not always as can be seen in the first game example.

Hereby two games by the opponents
A black win by SF in a Sicilian B90 where it won with both white as in this case with black.
On move 14 ..Rxc3!? SF played the thematic rook sac searching for counter chances. It is very daring in this position and I found just one example of it in chessbase online

[pgn]
[Event "Houdini3 - Komodo5.1, Blitz 20m+10s"]
[Site "AMD X6 1090T 3200 Mhz, (Fritz"]
[Date "2013.08.08"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Komodo 5.1r2 64-bit"]
[Black "Stockfish 030813 64 SSE4.2"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B90"]
[Annotator "0.49;0.34"]
[PlyCount "214"]
[TimeControl "1200+10"]

{AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor 3207 MHz W=22.0 plies; 4.111kN/s B=32.
7 plies; 5.613kN/s} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be3
e5 7. Nb3 Be7 8. Qd2 O-O 9. f3 Be6 10. O-O-O Qc7 11. g4 Rc8 {Both last book
move} 12. g5 {[%eval 49,24] [%emt 0:01:02]} Nh5 {[%eval 34,27] [%emt 0:00:31]}
13. Qf2 {[%eval 47,24] [%emt 0:01:02] (Kb1)} Qd8 {[%eval 48,27] [%emt 0:01:14]
(Nd7)} 14. h4 {[%eval 49,22] [%emt 0:00:32]} Rxc3 {[%eval 52,29] [%emt 0:00:58]
} 15. bxc3 {[%eval 48,21] [%emt 0:00:13]} Qc8 {[%eval 40,30] [%emt 0:01:25]}
16. Kb1 {[%eval 40,22] [%emt 0:01:31] (Qd2)} Nd7 {[%eval 32,27] [%emt 0:01:05]}
17. c4 {[%eval 44,21] [%emt 0:00:35]} Qc6 {[%eval 36,28] [%emt 0:00:29] (a5)}
18. Bh3 {[%eval 33,22] [%emt 0:02:22]} Qxc4 {[%eval 42,27] [%emt 0:00:37]} 19.
Bxe6 {[%eval 33,21] [%emt 0:00:28]} fxe6 {[%eval 34,29] [%emt 0:00:36]} 20. Rh2
{[%eval 33,21] [%emt 0:00:38]} Rc8 {[%eval 32,29] [%emt 0:00:42] (Nf8)} 21. Qg1
{[%eval 35,21] [%emt 0:01:52] (Qf1)} g6 {[%eval 32,27] [%emt 0:01:03]} 22. Rf2
{[%eval 34,21] [%emt 0:00:40] (Rhd2)} b5 {[%eval 12,27] [%emt 0:01:55] (Qb4)}
23. Qg4 {[%eval 25,20] [%emt 0:00:52]} Ng7 {[%eval 18,29] [%emt 0:00:29]} 24.
Qh3 {[%eval 13,22] [%emt 0:01:55] (Rd3)} Qc6 {[%eval 8,25] [%emt 0:00:30] (Qc3)
} 25. Re2 {[%eval 21,21] [%emt 0:00:39] (Rh2)} Qc7 {[%eval 14,25] [%emt 0:00:
45] (Qc3)} 26. Qg4 {[%eval 22,20] [%emt 0:00:37] (Qf1)} a5 {[%eval 0,29] [%emt
0:00:27] (Rf8)} 27. Nc1 {[%eval 9,22] [%emt 0:00:26]} Qc6 {[%eval 0,30] [%emt
0:00:34] (a4)} 28. Nd3 {[%eval 28,20] [%emt 0:00:19]} Bd8 {[%eval 0,31] [%emt
0:00:36] (a4)} 29. h5 {[%eval 2,21] [%emt 0:00:28] (Qg2)} gxh5 {[%eval 0,29]
[%emt 0:00:30] (Nb6)} 30. Qg2 {[%eval 5,21] [%emt 0:00:39]} Nf8 {[%eval 0,31]
[%emt 0:00:43]} 31. f4 {[%eval -1,22] [%emt 0:01:09]} exf4 {[%eval 0,31] [%emt
0:00:42]} 32. Nxf4 {[%eval 0,22] [%emt 0:00:35]} Ng6 {[%eval 0,31] [%emt 0:00:
33]} 33. Rf2 {[%eval -7,21] [%emt 0:00:59]} Qc4 {[%eval 0,31] [%emt 0:00:34]
(a4)} 34. Rd4 {[%eval -11,21] [%emt 0:00:25] (Nd3)} Qc6 {[%eval 0,28] [%emt 0:
00:47]} 35. Nxg6 {[%eval -11,22] [%emt 0:00:20] (Rd1)} hxg6 {[%eval -26,23]
[%emt 0:00:23]} 36. Qf3 {[%eval -11,23] [%emt 0:00:29] (Qf1)} Kh7 {[%eval -14,
27] [%emt 0:00:33]} 37. Rd3 {[%eval -11,23] [%emt 0:00:21] (Qd1)} b4 {[%eval
-48,24] [%emt 0:00:27] (Be7)} 38. Rd1 {[%eval -26,23] [%emt 0:02:07] (Qe2)} a4
{[%eval -62,27] [%emt 0:00:38]} 39. Rd3 {[%eval -27,22] [%emt 0:00:36] (Bc1)}
Be7 {[%eval -66,28] [%emt 0:00:40]} 40. Qf7 {[%eval -26,20] [%emt 0:00:12]
(Bc1)} Rc7 {[%eval -68,29] [%emt 0:00:31]} 41. Qf3 {[%eval -33,23] [%emt 0:00:
11]} Rb7 {[%eval -66,30] [%emt 0:00:27] (e5)} 42. Bd2 {[%eval -43,21] [%emt 0:
01:04] (Bc1)} Qc4 {[%eval -66,27] [%emt 0:00:24]} 43. Bc1 {[%eval -44,21]
[%emt 0:00:19]} e5 {[%eval -82,28] [%emt 0:00:33]} 44. Rd1 {[%eval -46,19]
[%emt 0:00:06] (Rf1)} Kg8 {[%eval -103,25] [%emt 0:00:26] (b3)} 45. Kb2 {
[%eval -64,23] [%emt 0:01:28]} Rb8 {[%eval -82,28] [%emt 0:01:19]} 46. Rdf1 {
[%eval -55,20] [%emt 0:00:06]} Rf8 {[%eval -90,29] [%emt 0:00:28]} 47. Qe3 {
[%eval -62,21] [%emt 0:00:12] (Qd3)} Re8 {[%eval -68,26] [%emt 0:00:17] (Rc8)}
48. Qf3 {[%eval -58,19] [%emt 0:00:04]} Rb8 {[%eval -92,28] [%emt 0:00:17]} 49.
Bd2 {[%eval -65,20] [%emt 0:00:11]} Rb7 {[%eval -82,27] [%emt 0:00:46] (Qd4+)}
50. Ka1 {[%eval -57,19] [%emt 0:00:07] (Qd3)} Rc7 {[%eval -129,26] [%emt 0:00:
31] (Kh7)} 51. Rd1 {[%eval -70,18] [%emt 0:00:05]} Kh7 {[%eval -129,28] [%emt
0:00:20] (Rc8)} 52. Qd3 {[%eval -88,18] [%emt 0:00:06] (Bc1)} Qc5 {[%eval -129,
26] [%emt 0:00:18]} 53. Be3 {[%eval -80,20] [%emt 0:00:17] (Rf7)} Qc3+ {[%eval
-119,26] [%emt 0:00:14]} 54. Qxc3 {[%eval -96,19] [%emt 0:00:12]} bxc3 {[%eval
-145,27] [%emt 0:00:16]} 55. a3 {[%eval -86,21] [%emt 0:00:06] (Rb1)} Ne6 {
[%eval -111,27] [%emt 0:00:20]} 56. Rg2 {[%eval -82,21] [%emt 0:00:09]} Nf4 {
[%eval -92,27] [%emt 0:00:13] (Kg7)} 57. Bxf4 {[%eval -74,20] [%emt 0:00:11]
(Rgg1)} exf4 {[%eval -129,25] [%emt 0:00:05]} 58. Rd4 {[%eval -77,22] [%emt 0:
00:05]} Rc5 {[%eval -149,27] [%emt 0:00:30]} 59. e5 {[%eval -88,21] [%emt 0:00:
04]} Rxe5 {[%eval -139,28] [%emt 0:00:14]} 60. Rxf4 {[%eval -87,18] [%emt 0:00:
02]} Bxg5 {[%eval -169,28] [%emt 0:00:13]} 61. Rxa4 {[%eval -85,20] [%emt 0:00:
04]} Bf6 {[%eval -165,27] [%emt 0:00:20]} 62. Rf2 {[%eval -96,22] [%emt 0:00:
28] (Ka2)} Re6 {[%eval -173,25] [%emt 0:00:22]} 63. Rb4 {[%eval -115,22] [%emt
0:00:14]} g5 {[%eval -242,26] [%emt 0:00:14]} 64. a4 {[%eval -102,22] [%emt 0:
00:08] (Rf1)} g4 {[%eval -256,27] [%emt 0:00:15] (Kg6)} 65. Rg2 {[%eval -120,
22] [%emt 0:00:07] (a5)} Kg6 {[%eval -266,27] [%emt 0:00:14] (Re7)} 66. a5 {
[%eval -137,22] [%emt 0:00:15]} Re7 {[%eval -296,29] [%emt 0:00:10] (Be5)} 67.
Ka2 {[%eval -165,24] [%emt 0:00:09] (a6)} Ra7 {[%eval -375,30] [%emt 0:00:27]}
68. Ra4 {[%eval -176,23] [%emt 0:00:06]} Be5 {[%eval -434,29] [%emt 0:00:13]}
69. Rg1 {[%eval -187,24] [%emt 0:00:08] (Kb3)} Kg5 {[%eval -462,29] [%emt 0:00:
10] (g3)} 70. Kb3 {[%eval -192,24] [%emt 0:00:09] (Kb1)} g3 {[%eval -468,26]
[%emt 0:00:08]} 71. Rh1 {[%eval -192,23] [%emt 0:00:06]} Rb7+ {[%eval -478,28]
[%emt 0:00:11]} 72. Ka3 {[%eval -200,24] [%emt 0:00:17]} Rb2 {[%eval -472,29]
[%emt 0:00:12]} 73. a6 {[%eval -202,22] [%emt 0:00:07]} d5 {[%eval -476,31]
[%emt 0:00:07]} 74. Rah4 {[%eval -202,23] [%emt 0:00:05]} g2 {[%eval -478,31]
[%emt 0:00:11]} 75. Rxh5+ {[%eval -260,24] [%emt 0:00:17]} Kg6 {[%eval -478,27]
[%emt 0:00:03]} 76. Rh6+ {[%eval -264,22] [%emt 0:00:03]} Kg7 {[%eval -492,30]
[%emt 0:00:05]} 77. Ra1 {[%eval -265,24] [%emt 0:00:09]} Kxh6 {[%eval -492,31]
[%emt 0:00:10]} 78. a7 {[%eval -264,22] [%emt 0:00:03]} Bd6+ {[%eval -507,32]
[%emt 0:00:13] (g1R)} 79. Ka4 {[%eval -265,24] [%emt 0:00:03]} g1=R {[%eval
-569,30] [%emt 0:00:11] (g1Q)} 80. Rxg1 {[%eval -265,25] [%emt 0:00:06]} Ra2+ {
[%eval -577,34] [%emt 0:00:05]} 81. Kb5 {[%eval -265,24] [%emt 0:00:03]} Rxa7 {
[%eval -585,37] [%emt 0:00:09]} 82. Kc6 {[%eval -266,28] [%emt 0:00:14]} Bf4 {
[%eval -602,38] [%emt 0:00:10]} 83. Kxd5 {[%eval -267,27] [%emt 0:00:07]} Ra4 {
[%eval -602,41] [%emt 0:00:10]} 84. Rh1+ {[%eval -267,28] [%emt 0:00:23] (Rg4)}
Kg5 {[%eval -618,38] [%emt 0:00:08]} 85. Rg1+ {[%eval -316,27] [%emt 0:00:24]
(Rh3)} Kf5 {[%eval -732,41] [%emt 0:00:14] (Kh5)} 86. Rg8 {[%eval -346,25]
[%emt 0:00:16] (Rg2)} Bg5 {[%eval -917,32] [%emt 0:00:05]} 87. Re8 {[%eval
-379,24] [%emt 0:00:06]} Kg4 {[%eval -1274,32] [%emt 0:00:03] (Bd2)} 88. Rf8 {
[%eval -395,27] [%emt 0:00:12]} Bf4 {[%eval -1832,32] [%emt 0:00:07] (Bd2)} 89.
Kc5 {[%eval -415,26] [%emt 0:00:10] (Rc8)} Kf3 {[%eval -1775,27] [%emt 0:00:03]
} 90. Kc6 {[%eval -501,24] [%emt 0:00:11] (Kb5)} Ke2 {[%eval -8303,36] [%emt 0:
00:04]} 91. Re8+ {[%eval -752,28] [%emt 0:00:52] (Kb5)} Kd1 {[%eval -8740,28]
[%emt 0:00:05]} 92. Kb5 {[%eval -515,16] [%emt 0:00:01]} Ra2 {[%eval -8740,27]
[%emt 0:00:16]} 93. Rf8 {[%eval -914,18] [%emt 0:00:05] (Rd8+)} Bd2 {[%eval
-32687,25] [%emt 0:00:17]} 94. Rf6 {[%eval 29172,22] [%emt 0:00:10] (Kc4)} Rxc2
{[%eval -32715,23] [%emt 0:00:05] (Kxc2)} 95. Kc4 {[%eval -32629,24] [%emt 0:
00:27] (Kc5)} Rb2 {[%eval -32713,22] [%emt 0:00:03] (Ra2)} 96. Kd4 {[%eval
29172,16] [%emt 0:00:01] (Rf1+)} c2 {[%eval -32715,21] [%emt 0:00:05]} 97. Rc6
{[%eval 29172,18] [%emt 0:00:04]} Rb5 {[%eval -32723,23] [%emt 0:00:29] (c1Q)}
98. Kd3 {[%eval -32743,18] [%emt 0:00:00] (Kc4)} c1=Q {[%eval -32745,22] [%emt
0:00:03]} 99. Rxc1+ {[%eval -32747,23] [%emt 0:00:01]} Bxc1 {[%eval -32747,34]
[%emt 0:00:11]} 100. Kd4 {[%eval -32749,22] [%emt 0:00:01] (Kc3)} Kd2 {[%eval
-32751,40] [%emt 0:00:10]} 101. Ke4 {[%eval -32753,22] [%emt 0:00:01]} Kc3 {
[%eval -32753,55] [%emt 0:00:10]} 102. Kf3 {[%eval -32755,22] [%emt 0:00:01]}
Kd4 {[%eval -32755,90] [%emt 0:00:10]} 103. Kg2 {[%eval -32757,22] [%emt 0:00:
01] (Kf2)} Ke3 {[%eval -32757,100] [%emt 0:00:01]} 104. Kg3 {[%eval -32759,23]
[%emt 0:00:02]} Rg5+ {[%eval -32759,100] [%emt 0:00:00]} 105. Kh3 {[%eval
-32761,23] [%emt 0:00:01]} Kf3 {[%eval -32761,100] [%emt 0:00:00]} 106. Kh4 {
[%eval -32763,24] [%emt 0:00:01] (Kh2)} Bd2 {[%eval -32763,100] [%emt 0:00:00]
(Be3)} 107. Kh3 {[%eval -32765,26] [%emt 0:00:02]} Rh5# {[%eval -32765,100]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 0-1
[/pgn]

A nice won game by Komodo is this Sicilian 2. c3 , After early queen exchange Komodo with white plays straightforward to an almost won position.
Especially 14 f4 ! (opening up with the two bishops) and breakmove 20 b5 is of my liking

[pgn]
[Event "Houdini3 - Komodo5.1, Blitz 20m+10s"]
[Site "AMD X6 1090T 3200 Mhz, (Fritz"]
[Date "2013.08.09"]
[Round "18"]
[White "Komodo 5.1r2 64-bit"]
[Black "Stockfish 030813 64 SSE4.2"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B22"]
[Annotator "0.00;-0.16"]
[PlyCount "79"]
[TimeControl "1200+10"]

{AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor 3207 MHz W=21.0 plies; 4.951kN/s B=26.
5 plies; 5.724kN/s} 1. e4 c5 2. c3 d5 3. exd5 Qxd5 4. d4 Nc6 5. Nf3 Nf6 6. Be3
Bg4 7. dxc5 Qxd1+ 8. Kxd1 Nd5 {Both last book move} 9. h3 {[%eval 0,20] [%emt
0:00:23]} O-O-O {[%eval -16,24] [%emt 0:00:33]} 10. Bd2 {[%eval 7,22] [%emt 0:
01:23] (Nbd2)} Bxf3+ {[%eval -30,25] [%emt 0:00:29]} 11. gxf3 {[%eval 8,20]
[%emt 0:00:10]} e6 {[%eval -12,26] [%emt 0:00:59]} 12. b4 {[%eval 15,20] [%emt
0:00:12]} Be7 {[%eval -10,26] [%emt 0:02:22]} 13. Kc2 {[%eval 17,20] [%emt 0:
01:00]} h6 {[%eval 0,27] [%emt 0:02:55] (Bf6)} 14. f4 {[%eval 32,22] [%emt 0:
01:11] (Bc4)} Bf6 {[%eval -4,23] [%emt 0:00:27]} 15. a3 {[%eval 31,22] [%emt 0:
00:22]} Nce7 {[%eval -4,25] [%emt 0:00:29] (Kb8)} 16. Ra2 {[%eval 45,20] [%emt
0:00:14] (Bg2)} Ng6 {[%eval 0,28] [%emt 0:00:36]} 17. a4 {[%eval 46,20] [%emt
0:00:08] (f5)} Ndxf4 {[%eval 0,25] [%emt 0:00:26] (Kb8)} 18. Na3 {[%eval 52,19]
[%emt 0:00:12]} Rhf8 {[%eval 8,26] [%emt 0:00:35] (Rxd2+)} 19. a5 {[%eval 74,
19] [%emt 0:00:20] (Nb5)} a6 {[%eval 40,25] [%emt 0:00:30] (Rxd2+)} 20. b5 {
[%eval 97,20] [%emt 0:00:10]} Be7 {[%eval 66,25] [%emt 0:00:37]} 21. Be3 {
[%eval 96,23] [%emt 0:01:17]} Kd7 {[%eval 107,27] [%emt 0:00:52] (axb5)} 22.
bxa6 {[%eval 117,21] [%emt 0:00:22]} bxa6 {[%eval 133,29] [%emt 0:00:32]} 23.
Bxa6 {[%eval 130,23] [%emt 0:00:53]} Nd5 {[%eval 179,29] [%emt 0:01:18]} 24.
Rd1 {[%eval 147,22] [%emt 0:00:31] (Rb2)} Kc6 {[%eval 111,27] [%emt 0:00:27]}
25. Rb1 {[%eval 158,21] [%emt 0:00:15]} Rb8 {[%eval 177,28] [%emt 0:00:42]
(Nxe3+)} 26. Rb6+ {[%eval 239,21] [%emt 0:00:31]} Nxb6 {[%eval 183,30] [%emt 0:
00:37]} 27. Bb5+ {[%eval 248,21] [%emt 0:00:11]} Kd5 {[%eval 163,30] [%emt 0:
00:24]} 28. cxb6 {[%eval 260,20] [%emt 0:00:14]} Bc5 {[%eval 226,31] [%emt 0:
01:04]} 29. c4+ {[%eval 268,22] [%emt 0:00:21] (Nc4)} Kd6 {[%eval 357,22]
[%emt 0:00:08]} 30. Kb3 {[%eval 271,22] [%emt 0:00:13] (Kc3)} Bxe3 {[%eval 337,
28] [%emt 0:00:28]} 31. fxe3 {[%eval 270,21] [%emt 0:00:11]} Ne5 {[%eval 371,
28] [%emt 0:00:52]} 32. Nb1 {[%eval 286,21] [%emt 0:00:17] (Kb4)} Nc6 {[%eval
442,25] [%emt 0:00:55] (f5)} 33. Nc3 {[%eval 304,20] [%emt 0:00:10]} Rfc8 {
[%eval 488,26] [%emt 0:00:25] (Nxa5+)} 34. Rd2+ {[%eval 337,21] [%emt 0:00:20]}
Ke5 {[%eval 521,27] [%emt 0:00:24]} 35. Bxc6 {[%eval 364,22] [%emt 0:00:20]}
Rxc6 {[%eval 549,27] [%emt 0:00:13]} 36. Kb4 {[%eval 376,21] [%emt 0:00:09]
(Rd7)} g5 {[%eval 640,25] [%emt 0:00:31] (Rbxb6+)} 37. Kb5 {[%eval 510,21]
[%emt 0:00:33] (c5)} Rbc8 {[%eval 838,24] [%emt 0:00:25]} 38. Rd4 {[%eval 541,
21] [%emt 0:00:30]} Rc5+ {[%eval 937,25] [%emt 0:00:29]} 39. Kb4 {[%eval 581,
22] [%emt 0:00:35]} R5c6 {[%eval 995,27] [%emt 0:00:37]} 40. Nb5 {[%eval 607,
21] [%emt 0:00:14] (b7)} 1-0
[/pgn]

beram · Post by **beram** » Mon Aug 12, 2013 12:02 am

PaulieD wrote:Thank you for this new time control test.
I think you will find that Stockfish 100813 is even stronger!

youe were wright Paul,

Code: Select all

AMD X6 1090T 3200 Mhz
Bram Testsuite 2.0 - 50 games, TC 4m+2s, 4CPU, ponder off

Stockfish 110813 64 SSE4.2   - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bit            30   - 20      +17/=26/-7    60.00%

earlier result with SF 0308:

Code: Select all

Stockfish 030813 64 SSE4.2   - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bit            29.0 - 21.0    +15/=28/-7    58.00%

PaulieD · Post by **PaulieD** » Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:27 am

i3 Dual Core @2.53 GHz - 6.0GB RAM
W7 Home Premium X.64 SP-1
GUI: Deep Fritz 13
TABLEBASES: None
HASH: 512
BOOK: 100 8move colors reversing
PONDER: OFF
TIME: 1 minute per side

Code: Select all

S30811 vs Kom, Blitz 1m  0
                                      
1   Stockfish 110813 64 SSE4.2   +28  +38/=32/-30 54.00%   54.0/100
2   Komodo 5.1r2 64-bit          -28  +30/=32/-38 46.00%   46.0/100

PGN: https://mega.co.nz/#!mVQHCByb!A9s42mVBY ... AprmpQB8Dw

beram · Post by **beram** » Mon Aug 12, 2013 10:48 pm

beram wrote:
PaulieD wrote:Thank you for this new time control test.
I think you will find that Stockfish 100813 is even stronger!
youe were wright Paul,
Code: Select all
AMD X6 1090T 3200 Mhz
Bram Testsuite 2.0 - 50 games, TC 4m+2s, 4CPU, ponder off

Stockfish 110813 64 SSE4.2   - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bit            30   - 20      +17/=26/-7    60.00%
earlier result with SF 0308:
Code: Select all
Stockfish 030813 64 SSE4.2   - Komodo 5.1r2 64-bit            29.0 - 21.0    +15/=28/-7    58.00%

against Houdini lesser result

Code: Select all

AMD X6 1090T 3200 Mhz
Bram Testsuite 2.0 - 50 games, TC 4m+2s, 4CPU, ponder off
                                
1   Houdini 3 x64               +19/=20/-11 58.00%   29.0/50
2   Stockfish 110813 64 SSE4.2  +11/=20/-19 42.00%   21.0/50

Stockfish_0308 vs Komodo5.1MP and Houdini 3

Stockfish_0308 vs Komodo5.1MP and Houdini 3

Re: Stockfish_0308 vs Komodo5.1MP and Houdini 3

Re: Stockfish_0308 vs Komodo5.1MP and Houdini 3

Re: Stockfish_0308 vs Komodo5.1MP and Houdini 3

Re: Stockfish_0308 vs Komodo5.1MP and Houdini 3

Re: Stockfish_0308 vs Komodo5.1MP and Houdini 3

Re: Stockfish_0308 vs Komodo5.1MP ..game examples

Re: Stockfish_0308 vs Komodo5.1MP and Houdini 3

Re: Stockfish_0308 vs Komodo5.1MP and Houdini 3

Re: Stockfish_0308 vs Komodo5.1MP and Houdini 3