match 3 , the revenge

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Hugo
Posts: 782
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:10 am

match 3 , the revenge

Post by Hugo »

Hi All

I started a new match, I hope its not boring that I choose Komodo and Houdini3 again. The last match was verry entertaining and had 25 wins out of 50 !!
So now I want to see how both do on more cores. Both engines get 11 cpu and 4GB hashtables this time. 1 cpu I need for live relay.
Conditions:
-Intel 12core machine X5680 @ 3.4GHz, no hyperthreading (2cpu on MoBo)
-4096 Mb hashtables, not EGTB at all
-GUI use small set of Nalimov EGTB (80Gb)
-Hiarcs book, 5 moves, tournament mode off(wide play)
-60min +10sec, ponder OFF

Live:
http://www.clemens-keck.de//screen2/
Replay:
http://www.clemens-keck.de/ReplayZone/match3.htm

enjoy :-)

Clemens keck
Top
Lyudmil Tsvetkov
Posts: 6052
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:41 pm

Re: match 3 , the revenge

Post by Lyudmil Tsvetkov »

Hugo wrote:Hi All

I started a new match, I hope its not boring that I choose Komodo and Houdini3 again. The last match was verry entertaining and had 25 wins out of 50 !!
So now I want to see how both do on more cores. Both engines get 11 cpu and 4GB hashtables this time. 1 cpu I need for live relay.
Conditions:
-Intel 12core machine X5680 @ 3.4GHz, no hyperthreading (2cpu on MoBo)
-4096 Mb hashtables, not EGTB at all
-GUI use small set of Nalimov EGTB (80Gb)
-Hiarcs book, 5 moves, tournament mode off(wide play)
-60min +10sec, ponder OFF

Live:
http://www.clemens-keck.de//screen2/
Replay:
http://www.clemens-keck.de/ReplayZone/match3.htm

enjoy :-)

Clemens keck
Hi Clemens.
Many thanks for the nice initiative. It should not be boring at all.
I still put my money on Houdini.

And jokingly, next time maybe it will be the turn of 'Cluster Komodo' :D
Top
lkaufman
Posts: 5960
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
Location: Maryland USA

Re: match 3 , the revenge

Post by lkaufman »

Thanks for running these matches. I'm running two similar matches myself (4 and 12 core, one hour + 30" but smaller hash), and so far after 41 games combined I have Komodo two games ahead, while your combined result at the moment is Komodo two games down. Since I am not "neutral" your result is the one that matters, but anyway I am satisfied that they are so close at long time controls as to make it impossible to determine which is stronger without massive testing.
Top
Hugo
Posts: 782
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:10 am

Re: match 3 , the revenge

Post by Hugo »

Hugo wrote:Hi All

I started a new match, I hope its not boring that I choose Komodo and Houdini3 again. The last match was verry entertaining and had 25 wins out of 50 !!
So now I want to see how both do on more cores. Both engines get 11 cpu and 4GB hashtables this time. 1 cpu I need for live relay.
Conditions:
-Intel 12core machine X5680 @ 3.4GHz, no hyperthreading (2cpu on MoBo)
-4096 Mb hashtables, not EGTB at all
-GUI use small set of Nalimov EGTB (80Gb)
-Hiarcs book, 5 moves, tournament mode off(wide play)
-60min +10sec, ponder OFF

Live:
http://www.clemens-keck.de//screen2/
Replay:
http://www.clemens-keck.de/ReplayZone/match3.htm

enjoy :-)

Clemens keck
After a few friendly draws now is fire at the board! Game 6 7 8 9 all decided games. Remarkable opening ECO A29: First time that an engine in these matches could win same opening with black and with white! It was Houdini 3. But still Komodo is in the lead with one point.
ReplayZone(+PGN) is updated :-)

C.K.
Top
User avatar
M ANSARI
Posts: 3707
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:10 pm

Re: match 3 , the revenge

Post by M ANSARI »

Again! Houdini 3 really needs some more heuristics when it comes to rook endgames. It plays way below its level in rook endgames. I guess against weaker opponents or at faster time controls being down a pawn in a rook endgame is no problem, but at LTC with stronger opponents it can be very different. This is really becoming a weakness with Houdini 3 and my guess is that the engine is much stronger if this little backdoor can be fixed.
Top
mwyoung
Posts: 2727
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm

Re: match 3 , the revenge

Post by mwyoung »

M ANSARI wrote:Again! Houdini 3 really needs some more heuristics when it comes to rook endgames. It plays way below its level in rook endgames. I guess against weaker opponents or at faster time controls being down a pawn in a rook endgame is no problem, but at LTC with stronger opponents it can be very different. This is really becoming a weakness with Houdini 3 and my guess is that the engine is much stronger if this little backdoor can be fixed.
I agree, but it does take another strong program to expose this weakness. Robert may not have been able to detect this weakness using only ultra fast test games during H3 development.
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
Top
lkaufman
Posts: 5960
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
Location: Maryland USA

Re: match 3 , the revenge

Post by lkaufman »

I'm running a similar match to yours (details differ but fairly similar; slower machine, but one hour plus 30", 12 cores, smaller hash). My results are nearly the same; right now score is tied after 31 games.
But I'm getting better four core results than you did; so far Komodo is + 2 after 30 games compared to your -3 result for 50 games. But I think you used the initial release on that test while I used the newer bugfix one, so it's not exactly the same. Maybe the bugfix version is a bit stronger, and/or it's just sample error.
Thanks again for running these matches!

Best regards,
Larry
Top
User avatar
RJN
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:18 am
Location: Orion Spiral Arm

Re: match 3 , the revenge

Post by RJN »

M ANSARI wrote:Again! Houdini 3 really needs some more heuristics when it comes to rook endgames. It plays way below its level in rook endgames. I guess against weaker opponents or at faster time controls being down a pawn in a rook endgame is no problem, but at LTC with stronger opponents it can be very different. This is really becoming a weakness with Houdini 3 and my guess is that the engine is much stronger if this little backdoor can be fixed.
40 in 2minutes, repeating, 2 threads, no books or Tablebases.

(see my 1st talkchess post for machine specs, nothing amazing compared to most here!)

[pgn][Event "Computer chess game"]
[Site "Rob-PC"]
[Date "2013.06.18"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Komodo51-64bit"]
[Black "Houdini_3_PRO-NONE"]
[Result "1-0"]
[BlackElo "2200"]
[ECO "D46"]
[Opening "Semi-Slav"]
[Time "02:12:23"]
[Variation "Chigorin, 7.O-O O-O 8.e4"]
[WhiteElo "2500"]
[TimeControl "40/120:40/120:40/120"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "317"]
[WhiteType "program"]
[BlackType "program"]

1. d4 {+0.26/18 5} d5 {-0.06/18 4} 2. c4 {+0.22/18 4} e6 {-0.05/17 2} 3.
Nf3 {+0.32/17 6} Nf6 {-0.02/17 3} 4. Nc3 {+0.24/16 8} h6 {-0.07/17 5} 5.
Bf4 {+0.25/16 5} Bd6 {-0.07/18 2} 6. Bg3 {+0.29/16 2} Bxg3 {0.00/17 3} 7.
hxg3 {+0.46/17 3} O-O {0.00/14 2} 8. e3 {+0.41/16 3} Qe7 {+0.01/17 2} 9.
cxd5 {+0.52/16 7} exd5 {+0.01/18 2} 10. Bd3 {+0.50/18 4} Be6 {+0.13/19 2}
11. O-O {+0.49/17 3} Nbd7 {+0.14/18 2} 12. Rc1 {+0.45/17 4} c6 {+0.12/19 2}
13. Qb3 {+0.45/17 2} Rab8 {+0.09/19 3} 14. Rfe1 {+0.40/16 2} Rfe8 {+0.08/19
5} 15. Qa4 {+0.46/16 2} a6 {+0.15/18 2} 16. a3 {+0.35/15 2} Rbc8 {+0.22/15
2} 17. b4 {+0.39/15 2} Ra8 {+0.16/16 2} 18. Qb3 {+0.29/16 3} Ne4 {+0.15/18
4} 19. Na4 {+0.29/16 1} b5 {+0.14/19 3} 20. Nc3 {+0.22/17 2} Nd6 {+0.28/18
2} 21. Ne2 {+0.23/15 2} Nc4 {+0.30/19 5} 22. Nf4 {+0.19/15 1} Nf6 {+0.24/18
2} 23. Qc3 {+0.07/16 2} a5 {+0.24/19 3} 24. bxa5 {+0.10/14 0} Nxa5
{+0.33/18 3} 25. Ne5 {+0.13/16 1} Nc4 {+0.36/18 2} 26. Nxc6 {+0.07/16 3}
Qd6 {+0.25/19 6} 27. Ne5 {+0.16/16 2} Rxa3 {+0.16/19 9} 28. Qc2 {+0.15/14
1} Nxe5 {+0.15/18 1} 29. dxe5 {+0.14/16 2} Qxe5 {+0.16/17 0} 30. Bxb5
{+0.11/17 3} Rc8 {+0.21/18 1} 31. Qd2 {+0.15/17 2} Rb8 {+0.15/19 2} 32. Bd3
{+0.26/14 0} Bg4 {+0.11/19 2} 33. Rc5 {+0.18/15 0} Rb2 {+0.16/17 1} 34. Bc2
{+0.32/14 0} Raa2 {+0.24/10 1} 35. Nxd5 {+0.21/14 0} Nxd5 {-0.15/18 1} 36.
Rxd5 {+0.19/18 1} Rxc2 {-0.11/20 2} 37. Qd3 {+0.24/19 0} Bf5 {-0.12/21 1}
38. Qxf5 {+0.26/15 0} Qxf5 {-0.14/21 1} 39. Rxf5 {+0.22/18 0} g6 {-0.09/22
2} 40. Rf4 {+0.33/18 1} f5 {-0.10/19 2} 41. e4 {+0.36/19 5} fxe4 {-0.09/22
2} 42. Rexe4 {+0.31/20 2} h5 {-0.09/20 2} 43. Rc4 {+0.47/20 4} Rcb2
{-0.09/23 2} 44. g4 {+0.52/19 3} hxg4 {-0.18/19 2} 45. Rc6 {+0.52/20 3} Kh7
{-0.22/20 2} 46. Rxg4 {+0.52/18 1} Rxf2 {-0.22/19 3} 47. Rcxg6 {+0.52/17 1}
Rf4 {-0.20/21 3} 48. Rg7+ {+0.51/18 3} Kh6 {-0.20/17 8} 49. R4g6+ {+0.51/16
0} Kh5 {-0.20/15} 50. Rg5+ {+0.51/19 2} Kh6 {-0.20/15 0} 51. R7g6+
{+0.52/19 2} Kh7 {0.00/1} 52. Kh2 {+0.51/20 4} Rh4+ {-0.16/21 2} 53. Kg3
{+0.51/19 0} Rh1 {-0.16/22 4} 54. Rf6 {+0.53/16 2} Ra3+ {-0.16/18 2} 55.
Rf3 {+0.53/15 0} Ra2 {-0.16/14 2} 56. Rf4 {+0.52/17 6} Kh6 {-0.17/21 3} 57.
Rg8 {+0.51/20 3} Kh7 {-0.17/21 2} 58. Rb8 {+0.51/17 3} Re1 {-0.16/18 5} 59.
Rb7+ {+0.51/16 3} Kg6 {-0.08/14 2} 60. Rb3 {+0.51/17 5} Ree2 {-0.08/14 3}
61. Rg4+ {+0.52/16 1} Kf6 {-0.17/18 2} 62. Kh3 {+0.54/15 0} Re1 {-0.17/18
4} 63. Rf3+ {+0.58/14 1} Ke5 {-0.19/20 2} 64. Rg5+ {+0.60/15 1} Ke4
{-0.18/19 3} 65. Rb5 {+0.57/15 4} Rh1+ {-0.21/20 4} 66. Kg3 {+0.65/14 3}
Kd4 {-0.21/15 2} 67. Rf4+ {+0.69/16 1} Kc3 {-0.20/21 6} 68. Rc5+ {+0.67/18
9} Kd3 {-0.21/20 2} 69. Rd5+ {+0.67/18 3} Kc3 {-0.21/21 2} 70. Re5
{+0.65/16 2} Kd3 {-0.19/20 3} 71. Re6 {+0.62/17 3} Ra8 {-0.19/18 2} 72.
Rd6+ {+0.59/16 3} Ke3 {-0.18/20 5} 73. Rf3+ {+0.58/17 2} Ke4 {-0.17/17 1}
74. Rd2 {+0.58/17 2} Ke5 {-0.16/16 1} 75. Re2+ {+0.58/15 2} Kd4 {-0.15/10
1} 76. Rf7 {+0.60/14 1} Kd5 {-0.16/17 2} 77. Kf2 {+0.58/17 5} Raa1
{-0.16/16 2} 78. Rf4 {+0.58/16 1} Rhg1 {-0.17/17 3} 79. Rf5+ {+0.60/15 2}
Kd6 {-0.18/18 3} 80. Rf3 {+0.59/17 4} Rgf1+ {-0.18/17 1} 81. Kg3 {+0.60/18
2} Rfd1 {-0.21/17 3} 82. Rb3 {+0.59/17 7} Kd5 {-0.19/18 4} 83. Rbe3
{+0.59/17 6} Rd4 {-0.17/18 2} 84. Kf2 {+0.59/19 7} Rf4+ {-0.18/18 2} 85.
Rf3 {+0.60/18 0} Rh4 {-0.19/19 2} 86. Rd3+ {+0.64/16 1} Kc4 {-0.18/19 2}
87. Red2 {+0.66/16 5} Rf4+ {-0.18/18 2} 88. Rf3 {+0.67/18 2} Rh4 {-0.17/17
3} 89. Rf8 {+0.61/17 5} Rh6 {-0.22/17 2} 90. Rf5 {+0.58/15 4} Rhh1
{-0.11/18 2} 91. Kf3 {+0.47/16 4} Ra3+ {-0.16/18 2} 92. Kg4 {+0.46/18 1}
Rg1 {-0.14/21 3} 93. Rf3 {+0.44/19 3} Ra7 {-0.06/9 3} 94. g3 {+0.46/16 1}
Rg7+ {-0.14/12 2} 95. Kf4 {+0.46/15 0} Rg8 {-0.14/13 2} 96. Re2 {+0.55/15
2} Kd4 {-0.14/13 2} 97. Re4+ {+0.52/16 0} Kd5 {-0.16/19 3} 98. Re5+
{+0.53/19 3} Kd4 {-0.16/22 3} 99. Rg5 {+0.54/17 2} Re8 {-0.16/19 2} 100.
Ra3 {+0.54/16 1} Rf8+ {-0.16/17 4} 101. Kg4 {+0.53/16 2} Kc4 {-0.19/19 3}
102. Rf3 {+0.58/16 2} Re8 {-0.17/19 2} 103. Rf4+ {+0.55/18 5} Kc3 {-0.21/19
2} 104. Kf3 {+0.63/19 1} Ree1 {-0.25/20 16} 105. Ra5 {+0.68/15 1} Kd3
{-0.28/20 2} 106. Ra3+ {+0.64/15 1} Kd2 {-0.27/21 2} 107. g4 {+0.72/18 4}
Rb1 {-0.35/19 2} 108. Ra2+ {+0.72/18 2} Kd3 {-0.29/20 1} 109. Rfa4
{+0.75/17 1} Rb7 {-0.30/20 6} 110. R2a3+ {+0.78/19 3} Kc2 {-0.37/22 3} 111.
Rc4+ {+0.78/20 4} Kd2 {-0.40/21 1} 112. Rd4+ {+0.77/16 1} Kc2 {-0.40/19 0}
113. Raa4 {+0.79/17 1} Rh7 {-0.37/19 1} 114. Rdc4+ {+0.80/17 1} Kd3
{-0.40/20 1} 115. Rf4 {+0.82/17 1} Kc2 {-0.40/19 1} 116. Ra2+ {+1.00/17 2}
Kd3 {-0.46/20 2} 117. Ra3+ {+1.01/17 1} Kc2 {-0.52/21 3} 118. Kf2 {+1.06/17
1} Rhh1 {-0.56/20 2} 119. Rg3 {+1.15/15 0} Rf1+ {-0.80/16 2} 120. Ke3
{+1.19/15 0} Ra1 {-0.85/17 1} 121. Rc4+ {+1.26/17 4} Kb2 {-0.83/15 6} 122.
g5 {+1.28/15 1} Ra3+ {-0.83/13 2} 123. Kf4 {+1.37/17 2} Ra6 {-0.86/14 2}
124. Kf5 {+1.59/17 5} Ra5+ {-1.46/19 6} 125. Kg4 {+1.61/17 2} Ra6 {-2.13/20
12} 126. Rf4 {+1.75/16 1} Ka2 {-2.41/18 8} 127. Rf2+ {+1.95/18 2} Ka1
{-2.35/20 2} 128. Rgg2 {+2.33/16 1} Re1 {-2.03/12 14} 129. Kh5 {+2.42/18 1}
Ra5 {-2.38/10 1} 130. Kh6 {+2.53/18 2} Ra8 {-5.03/17 3} 131. Rh2 {+4.84/18
3} Rh8+ {-5.33/18 1} 132. Kg7 {+4.90/20 1} Rb8 {-6.15/20 1} 133. g6
{+5.01/20 1} Kb1 {-6.29/22 1} 134. Re2 {+5.17/23 3} Rg1 {-6.35/22 1} 135.
Reg2 {+5.17/24 1} Rb7+ {-6.40/23 1} 136. Kh8 {+284.27/23 7} Rb8+ {-6.53/24
2} 137. Kh7 {+M484/24 1} Rc1 {-6.56/24 2} 138. g7 {+M484/23 3} Rb7
{-6.67/23 1} 139. Kh8 {+M499/21 0} Rb8+ {-6.67/22 0} 140. g8=Q {+M488/20 1}
Rxg8+ {-7.21/21 0} 141. Kxg8 {+M484/20 0} Re1 {-9.74/25 3} 142. Kf7
{+M486/21 8} Rf1+ {-11.31/20 0} 143. Rf2 {+M484/20 4} Rd1 {-11.38/19 0}
144. Rb2+ {+M488/18 6} Ka1 {-11.38/15 0} 145. Rbd2 {+M484/19 5} Rg1
{-6.55/14 0} 146. Ke6 {+M17/18 1} Rg6+ {-6.55/13 0} 147. Ke5 {+M15/16 1}
Rg1 {-M10/30 1} 148. Ra2+ {+M12/17 0} Kb1 {0.00/1} 149. Rhb2+ {+M11/17 0}
Kc1 {0.00/1} 150. Rg2 {+M10/18 0} Kb1 {-6.40/9 0} 151. Kd4 {+M9/18 0} Rf1
{-6.23/9 0} 152. Rgb2+ {+M8/18 0} Kc1 {0.00/1} 153. Rf2 {+M7/19 0} Rxf2
{-6.36/9} 154. Rxf2 {+M6/21 0} Kd1 {-M5/20 0} 155. Kd3 {+M5/23 0} Kc1
{-M4/18 0} 156. Rh2 {+M4/23 0} Kb1 {-M3/16 0} 157. Kc3 {+M3/24 0} Ka1
{-M2/14 0} 158. Kb3 {+M2/28 1} Kb1 {0.00/1} 159. Rh1# {+M1/32 0} 1-0
[/pgn]
Top
Lyudmil Tsvetkov
Posts: 6052
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:41 pm

Re: match 3 , the revenge

Post by Lyudmil Tsvetkov »

RJN wrote:
M ANSARI wrote:Again! Houdini 3 really needs some more heuristics when it comes to rook endgames. It plays way below its level in rook endgames. I guess against weaker opponents or at faster time controls being down a pawn in a rook endgame is no problem, but at LTC with stronger opponents it can be very different. This is really becoming a weakness with Houdini 3 and my guess is that the engine is much stronger if this little backdoor can be fixed.
40 in 2minutes, repeating, 2 threads, no books or Tablebases.

(see my 1st talkchess post for machine specs, nothing amazing compared to most here!)

[pgn][Event "Computer chess game"]
[Site "Rob-PC"]
[Date "2013.06.18"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Komodo51-64bit"]
[Black "Houdini_3_PRO-NONE"]
[Result "1-0"]
[BlackElo "2200"]
[ECO "D46"]
[Opening "Semi-Slav"]
[Time "02:12:23"]
[Variation "Chigorin, 7.O-O O-O 8.e4"]
[WhiteElo "2500"]
[TimeControl "40/120:40/120:40/120"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "317"]
[WhiteType "program"]
[BlackType "program"]

1. d4 {+0.26/18 5} d5 {-0.06/18 4} 2. c4 {+0.22/18 4} e6 {-0.05/17 2} 3.
Nf3 {+0.32/17 6} Nf6 {-0.02/17 3} 4. Nc3 {+0.24/16 8} h6 {-0.07/17 5} 5.
Bf4 {+0.25/16 5} Bd6 {-0.07/18 2} 6. Bg3 {+0.29/16 2} Bxg3 {0.00/17 3} 7.
hxg3 {+0.46/17 3} O-O {0.00/14 2} 8. e3 {+0.41/16 3} Qe7 {+0.01/17 2} 9.
cxd5 {+0.52/16 7} exd5 {+0.01/18 2} 10. Bd3 {+0.50/18 4} Be6 {+0.13/19 2}
11. O-O {+0.49/17 3} Nbd7 {+0.14/18 2} 12. Rc1 {+0.45/17 4} c6 {+0.12/19 2}
13. Qb3 {+0.45/17 2} Rab8 {+0.09/19 3} 14. Rfe1 {+0.40/16 2} Rfe8 {+0.08/19
5} 15. Qa4 {+0.46/16 2} a6 {+0.15/18 2} 16. a3 {+0.35/15 2} Rbc8 {+0.22/15
2} 17. b4 {+0.39/15 2} Ra8 {+0.16/16 2} 18. Qb3 {+0.29/16 3} Ne4 {+0.15/18
4} 19. Na4 {+0.29/16 1} b5 {+0.14/19 3} 20. Nc3 {+0.22/17 2} Nd6 {+0.28/18
2} 21. Ne2 {+0.23/15 2} Nc4 {+0.30/19 5} 22. Nf4 {+0.19/15 1} Nf6 {+0.24/18
2} 23. Qc3 {+0.07/16 2} a5 {+0.24/19 3} 24. bxa5 {+0.10/14 0} Nxa5
{+0.33/18 3} 25. Ne5 {+0.13/16 1} Nc4 {+0.36/18 2} 26. Nxc6 {+0.07/16 3}
Qd6 {+0.25/19 6} 27. Ne5 {+0.16/16 2} Rxa3 {+0.16/19 9} 28. Qc2 {+0.15/14
1} Nxe5 {+0.15/18 1} 29. dxe5 {+0.14/16 2} Qxe5 {+0.16/17 0} 30. Bxb5
{+0.11/17 3} Rc8 {+0.21/18 1} 31. Qd2 {+0.15/17 2} Rb8 {+0.15/19 2} 32. Bd3
{+0.26/14 0} Bg4 {+0.11/19 2} 33. Rc5 {+0.18/15 0} Rb2 {+0.16/17 1} 34. Bc2
{+0.32/14 0} Raa2 {+0.24/10 1} 35. Nxd5 {+0.21/14 0} Nxd5 {-0.15/18 1} 36.
Rxd5 {+0.19/18 1} Rxc2 {-0.11/20 2} 37. Qd3 {+0.24/19 0} Bf5 {-0.12/21 1}
38. Qxf5 {+0.26/15 0} Qxf5 {-0.14/21 1} 39. Rxf5 {+0.22/18 0} g6 {-0.09/22
2} 40. Rf4 {+0.33/18 1} f5 {-0.10/19 2} 41. e4 {+0.36/19 5} fxe4 {-0.09/22
2} 42. Rexe4 {+0.31/20 2} h5 {-0.09/20 2} 43. Rc4 {+0.47/20 4} Rcb2
{-0.09/23 2} 44. g4 {+0.52/19 3} hxg4 {-0.18/19 2} 45. Rc6 {+0.52/20 3} Kh7
{-0.22/20 2} 46. Rxg4 {+0.52/18 1} Rxf2 {-0.22/19 3} 47. Rcxg6 {+0.52/17 1}
Rf4 {-0.20/21 3} 48. Rg7+ {+0.51/18 3} Kh6 {-0.20/17 8} 49. R4g6+ {+0.51/16
0} Kh5 {-0.20/15} 50. Rg5+ {+0.51/19 2} Kh6 {-0.20/15 0} 51. R7g6+
{+0.52/19 2} Kh7 {0.00/1} 52. Kh2 {+0.51/20 4} Rh4+ {-0.16/21 2} 53. Kg3
{+0.51/19 0} Rh1 {-0.16/22 4} 54. Rf6 {+0.53/16 2} Ra3+ {-0.16/18 2} 55.
Rf3 {+0.53/15 0} Ra2 {-0.16/14 2} 56. Rf4 {+0.52/17 6} Kh6 {-0.17/21 3} 57.
Rg8 {+0.51/20 3} Kh7 {-0.17/21 2} 58. Rb8 {+0.51/17 3} Re1 {-0.16/18 5} 59.
Rb7+ {+0.51/16 3} Kg6 {-0.08/14 2} 60. Rb3 {+0.51/17 5} Ree2 {-0.08/14 3}
61. Rg4+ {+0.52/16 1} Kf6 {-0.17/18 2} 62. Kh3 {+0.54/15 0} Re1 {-0.17/18
4} 63. Rf3+ {+0.58/14 1} Ke5 {-0.19/20 2} 64. Rg5+ {+0.60/15 1} Ke4
{-0.18/19 3} 65. Rb5 {+0.57/15 4} Rh1+ {-0.21/20 4} 66. Kg3 {+0.65/14 3}
Kd4 {-0.21/15 2} 67. Rf4+ {+0.69/16 1} Kc3 {-0.20/21 6} 68. Rc5+ {+0.67/18
9} Kd3 {-0.21/20 2} 69. Rd5+ {+0.67/18 3} Kc3 {-0.21/21 2} 70. Re5
{+0.65/16 2} Kd3 {-0.19/20 3} 71. Re6 {+0.62/17 3} Ra8 {-0.19/18 2} 72.
Rd6+ {+0.59/16 3} Ke3 {-0.18/20 5} 73. Rf3+ {+0.58/17 2} Ke4 {-0.17/17 1}
74. Rd2 {+0.58/17 2} Ke5 {-0.16/16 1} 75. Re2+ {+0.58/15 2} Kd4 {-0.15/10
1} 76. Rf7 {+0.60/14 1} Kd5 {-0.16/17 2} 77. Kf2 {+0.58/17 5} Raa1
{-0.16/16 2} 78. Rf4 {+0.58/16 1} Rhg1 {-0.17/17 3} 79. Rf5+ {+0.60/15 2}
Kd6 {-0.18/18 3} 80. Rf3 {+0.59/17 4} Rgf1+ {-0.18/17 1} 81. Kg3 {+0.60/18
2} Rfd1 {-0.21/17 3} 82. Rb3 {+0.59/17 7} Kd5 {-0.19/18 4} 83. Rbe3
{+0.59/17 6} Rd4 {-0.17/18 2} 84. Kf2 {+0.59/19 7} Rf4+ {-0.18/18 2} 85.
Rf3 {+0.60/18 0} Rh4 {-0.19/19 2} 86. Rd3+ {+0.64/16 1} Kc4 {-0.18/19 2}
87. Red2 {+0.66/16 5} Rf4+ {-0.18/18 2} 88. Rf3 {+0.67/18 2} Rh4 {-0.17/17
3} 89. Rf8 {+0.61/17 5} Rh6 {-0.22/17 2} 90. Rf5 {+0.58/15 4} Rhh1
{-0.11/18 2} 91. Kf3 {+0.47/16 4} Ra3+ {-0.16/18 2} 92. Kg4 {+0.46/18 1}
Rg1 {-0.14/21 3} 93. Rf3 {+0.44/19 3} Ra7 {-0.06/9 3} 94. g3 {+0.46/16 1}
Rg7+ {-0.14/12 2} 95. Kf4 {+0.46/15 0} Rg8 {-0.14/13 2} 96. Re2 {+0.55/15
2} Kd4 {-0.14/13 2} 97. Re4+ {+0.52/16 0} Kd5 {-0.16/19 3} 98. Re5+
{+0.53/19 3} Kd4 {-0.16/22 3} 99. Rg5 {+0.54/17 2} Re8 {-0.16/19 2} 100.
Ra3 {+0.54/16 1} Rf8+ {-0.16/17 4} 101. Kg4 {+0.53/16 2} Kc4 {-0.19/19 3}
102. Rf3 {+0.58/16 2} Re8 {-0.17/19 2} 103. Rf4+ {+0.55/18 5} Kc3 {-0.21/19
2} 104. Kf3 {+0.63/19 1} Ree1 {-0.25/20 16} 105. Ra5 {+0.68/15 1} Kd3
{-0.28/20 2} 106. Ra3+ {+0.64/15 1} Kd2 {-0.27/21 2} 107. g4 {+0.72/18 4}
Rb1 {-0.35/19 2} 108. Ra2+ {+0.72/18 2} Kd3 {-0.29/20 1} 109. Rfa4
{+0.75/17 1} Rb7 {-0.30/20 6} 110. R2a3+ {+0.78/19 3} Kc2 {-0.37/22 3} 111.
Rc4+ {+0.78/20 4} Kd2 {-0.40/21 1} 112. Rd4+ {+0.77/16 1} Kc2 {-0.40/19 0}
113. Raa4 {+0.79/17 1} Rh7 {-0.37/19 1} 114. Rdc4+ {+0.80/17 1} Kd3
{-0.40/20 1} 115. Rf4 {+0.82/17 1} Kc2 {-0.40/19 1} 116. Ra2+ {+1.00/17 2}
Kd3 {-0.46/20 2} 117. Ra3+ {+1.01/17 1} Kc2 {-0.52/21 3} 118. Kf2 {+1.06/17
1} Rhh1 {-0.56/20 2} 119. Rg3 {+1.15/15 0} Rf1+ {-0.80/16 2} 120. Ke3
{+1.19/15 0} Ra1 {-0.85/17 1} 121. Rc4+ {+1.26/17 4} Kb2 {-0.83/15 6} 122.
g5 {+1.28/15 1} Ra3+ {-0.83/13 2} 123. Kf4 {+1.37/17 2} Ra6 {-0.86/14 2}
124. Kf5 {+1.59/17 5} Ra5+ {-1.46/19 6} 125. Kg4 {+1.61/17 2} Ra6 {-2.13/20
12} 126. Rf4 {+1.75/16 1} Ka2 {-2.41/18 8} 127. Rf2+ {+1.95/18 2} Ka1
{-2.35/20 2} 128. Rgg2 {+2.33/16 1} Re1 {-2.03/12 14} 129. Kh5 {+2.42/18 1}
Ra5 {-2.38/10 1} 130. Kh6 {+2.53/18 2} Ra8 {-5.03/17 3} 131. Rh2 {+4.84/18
3} Rh8+ {-5.33/18 1} 132. Kg7 {+4.90/20 1} Rb8 {-6.15/20 1} 133. g6
{+5.01/20 1} Kb1 {-6.29/22 1} 134. Re2 {+5.17/23 3} Rg1 {-6.35/22 1} 135.
Reg2 {+5.17/24 1} Rb7+ {-6.40/23 1} 136. Kh8 {+284.27/23 7} Rb8+ {-6.53/24
2} 137. Kh7 {+M484/24 1} Rc1 {-6.56/24 2} 138. g7 {+M484/23 3} Rb7
{-6.67/23 1} 139. Kh8 {+M499/21 0} Rb8+ {-6.67/22 0} 140. g8=Q {+M488/20 1}
Rxg8+ {-7.21/21 0} 141. Kxg8 {+M484/20 0} Re1 {-9.74/25 3} 142. Kf7
{+M486/21 8} Rf1+ {-11.31/20 0} 143. Rf2 {+M484/20 4} Rd1 {-11.38/19 0}
144. Rb2+ {+M488/18 6} Ka1 {-11.38/15 0} 145. Rbd2 {+M484/19 5} Rg1
{-6.55/14 0} 146. Ke6 {+M17/18 1} Rg6+ {-6.55/13 0} 147. Ke5 {+M15/16 1}
Rg1 {-M10/30 1} 148. Ra2+ {+M12/17 0} Kb1 {0.00/1} 149. Rhb2+ {+M11/17 0}
Kc1 {0.00/1} 150. Rg2 {+M10/18 0} Kb1 {-6.40/9 0} 151. Kd4 {+M9/18 0} Rf1
{-6.23/9 0} 152. Rgb2+ {+M8/18 0} Kc1 {0.00/1} 153. Rf2 {+M7/19 0} Rxf2
{-6.36/9} 154. Rxf2 {+M6/21 0} Kd1 {-M5/20 0} 155. Kd3 {+M5/23 0} Kc1
{-M4/18 0} 156. Rh2 {+M4/23 0} Kb1 {-M3/16 0} 157. Kc3 {+M3/24 0} Ka1
{-M2/14 0} 158. Kb3 {+M2/28 1} Kb1 {0.00/1} 159. Rh1# {+M1/32 0} 1-0
[/pgn]
Of course, very short time control, not good to make any judgements, but still 40...f5 is very bad, reducing black's king safety (there are still 4 rooks). Otherwise the endgame seems a dead draw.
Top
User avatar
RJN
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:18 am
Location: Orion Spiral Arm

Re: match 3 , the revenge

Post by RJN »

No judgements, and I think Houdini is awesome. I was just very surprised how this game turned out, and thought I would post it, FWIW.

Thanks for your observations.
Top

Return to “Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches”