Here Are 3 More Strelka 5.7 MP x64 Matches For You

[geots]

I suppose I need to get Yuri's first attempt at Strelka 5.7 MP. He is adamant that it is likely stronger than this 3rd and latest version. The only thing I am sure of is that we are not nearly looking at the last beta- nor are we looking at the final version.

Still no explanation for the 1st dramatic score- as they were all good wins. But these 3 matches are a little more what one might look at as realistic. There will be more to follow in the coming days.

(Last match of the 3 played on the XPS 8500 Intel i5 4Core system.)






Alienware AURORA_R4
Intel i7 w/6 True Cores
and Factory Overclocked
Fritz 11/13 gui
4Core/64-bit
128MB hash
Bases=NONE
Ponder_Learning=OFF
Perfect 2012b.ctg w/12-move limit
4m+2s Blitz
Match=50 games

Code: Select all

SP8-i7, Blitz:4'+2"  6/2/2013  

                                 
Strelka 5.7 MP x64            +7    +7/-6/=37   51.00%   25.5/50
Stockfish 3 JA 64bit SSE4.2   -7    +6/-7/=37   49.00%   24.5/50

Code: Select all

SP8-i7, Blitz:4'+2"  6/3/2013  

                         
Strelka 5.7 MP x64    +7     +7/-6/=37 51.00%   25.5/50
Critter 1.6a 64-bit   -7     +6/-7/=37 49.00%   24.5/50

Code: Select all

XPS-i5, Blitz 4m+2s  6/2/2013  

                                    
Strelka 5.7 MP x64         +21    +12/-9/=29   53.00%   26.5/50   
Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64   -21    +9/-12/=29   47.00%   23.5/50

Till then-

[Gusev]

Yes, George, please ask Yuri if he can provide his first version for testing. I am still unsure which "easily Top 10" engine served as your first opponent to Strelka 5.7 MP.

[Houdini]

George, knowing that Strelka 5.1 was just a clone of Houdini 1.5a (it has the same evaluation and search but Ivanhoe-like surrounding management code), what exactly is so impressive about the performances you show above?

[sainzlei]

Houdini chess engine is a clone , too .
A very expensive clone engine ...

[Osipov Jury]

Robert, we're both thieves.

[geots]

George, knowing that Strelka 5.1 was just a clone of Houdini 1.5a (it has the same evaluation and search but Ivanhoe-like surrounding management code), what exactly is so impressive about the performances you show above?

Nothing is impressive, Robert. They are just results. I guess sort of like Komodo. Not that it is strong right now, just that he finally started an MP is most of the interest.

As for what A took from B, or B took from C, or C took from D- I would likely be the last person to be able to answer that.



All the best,

george

[Dr.Wael Deeb]

George, knowing that Strelka 5.1 was just a clone of Houdini 1.5a (it has the same evaluation and search but Ivanhoe-like surrounding management code), what exactly is so impressive about the performances you show above?

[Gusev]

Robert, we're both thieves.

Then again, Proudhon said, "Property is theft!"

[gerold]

Robert, we're both thieves.

Hi Osipov.

Could you please post your latest strongest program so we can get on with our important testing. 5.5 was a nice improvement over 5.0.

Best to you,
Gerold.

[geots]

I believe Strelka 5.7 MP will improve with future releases, just based on the fact that on 1 Core- Strelka 5.6 beat this same Ivanhoe 31-5!

BTW, to follow this result I will roll the chair over to the Intel i7 and post the results from a 4-Core match between Strelka MP and RobboLito 0.21Q.





XPS 8500 Intel i5
w/4 True Cores
Fritz 13 gui
4Cores/64bit
128MB hash
Bases=NONE
Ponder_Learning=OFF
Perfect 2012b.ctg w/12-move limit
4m+2s Blitz
Match=50 games

Code: Select all

XPS-i5, Blitz 4m+2s  6/5/2013  

                              
Strelka 5.7 MP x64   +14    +9/=34/-7   52.00%   26.0/50
Ivanhoe 46h x64      -14    +7/=34/-9   48.00%   24.0/50

Sp8