Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Results
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:50 pm
- Location: USA
Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Results
Happy chessing!
-
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:23 am
- Location: http://www.arasanchess.org
Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res
from game 36:
[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -
Rg7 (as played) is good, but I think even better is Nxh4!
--Jon
[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -
Rg7 (as played) is good, but I think even better is Nxh4!
--Jon
-
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm
Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res
Indeed !jdart wrote:from game 36:
[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -
Rg7 (as played) is good, but I think even better is Nxh4!
--Jon
[D]r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - - 0 1
Analysis by HIARCS 13.2 MP:
1...Cxh4 2.gxh4 Tg4 3.Dh2 Df6 4.Fe2 Txh4 5.Fxh5 Txh2+
-+ (-2.27) Profondeur: 20/62 00:01:33 178mN
(Doe, 24.05.2012)
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res
Absolutely....It wins the game in a fashionable wayjdart wrote:from game 36:
[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -
Rg7 (as played) is good, but I think even better is Nxh4!
--Jon
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:50 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res
How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it?jdart wrote:from game 36:
[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -
Rg7 (as played) is good, but I think even better is Nxh4!
--Jon
Happy chessing!
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:23 am
- Location: http://www.arasanchess.org
Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res
I used Houdini 1.5a, and it found this pretty quickly. Maybe 2.0 is slower on this position?How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it?
--Jon
-
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 12:21 am
Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res
Very nice position, a very nice tactic! My program has a lot of trouble with it (on my laptop, 1 core:)jdart wrote:I used Houdini 1.5a, and it found this pretty quickly. Maybe 2.0 is slower on this position?How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it?
--Jon
Code: Select all
time ply score variation
1.6 13 -0.327 Ne7, Bb7 Rxg3, Bxa8 Rh3+, Kg2 Rxh4, Kg3 Ng6, Qe1 Rg4+, Kh3 Nxf4+, Kh2 e3, Rd1
5.6 14 -0.206 Ne7, Qe1 Rg4, Rg2 Bf2, Qxf2 Rxa6, b3 Nxd5, Qd4 Ra5, b4 Rb5, Kg1
7.9 15 -0.061 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Rg2 Rag8, c4 Ng6, Re2 Ne7, Rf3 Bd4, Ra3 Qf6, Kh2 Rg4
11.4 16 +0.000 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Rg2 Rag8, c4 Ng6, Re2 Ne7, Rg2
16.6 17 -0.088 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Bc4 Rag8, Rg2 Ng6, Rh2 Nxf4, gxf4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Rf2 Qg4+, Kf1
21.1 18 +0.000 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Bc4 Rag8, Rg2 Ng6, Re2 Ne7, Rg2
33.4 19 +0.000 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Bc4 Rag8, Rg2 Ng6, Re2 Ne7, Rg2
277.3 20 +0.853 Rg7, Qe1 Rag8, c4 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Re2 Qg4+, Kf1 Qxh4, Nc3 Qh1+, Kf2 Qf3+, Ke1 e3, Kd1 h4
317.3 21 +0.712 Rg7, Qe1 Rag8, c4 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Rg2 Qxh4, c5 Qf6, Kh1 Qd4, Nc3 Qxc5, Rg5 h4, Rxf5
425.0 22 +0.771 Rg7, Qe1 Rag8, c4 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Rg2 Qxh4, c5 e3, Nc3 dxc5, Be2 Qd4, a4 h4, Kh2
724.3 23 +0.946 Rg7, Qe1 Rag8, c4 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Rg2 Qxh4, c5 e3, Nc3 dxc5, Be2 Qd4, a4 Kh6, Kh2 c4
2606.4 24 +2.678 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg3, Qh2 Rag8, c4 Qf6, Bc8 R3g4, Bd7 Kh8, b4 Rxh4, b5 Rb8, c5 dxc5, Rg1 Rg8, b6 Rxh2+, Rxh2 Rxg1+, Kxg1 Qa1+, Kg2 Qxa2+, Kg3
3318.3 25 +2.873 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg3, Qh2 Rag8, c4 Qf6, c5 R8g4, c6 Rxh4, Nc3 Bb6, a4 Kg6, Rg2 Rxg2, Qxh4 Qxh4+, Kxg2 Qg4+, Kh2 h4, Ne2 h3, Ng3 e3
-
- Posts: 2016
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res
small hardwarejdart wrote:I used Houdini 1.5a, and it found this pretty quickly. Maybe 2.0 is slower on this position?How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it?
--Jon
[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -
Houdini
17/53 0:01 -1.95++ 1...Nxh4 (21.512.339) 14284
17/60 0:03 -2.58 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (49.667.690) 14455
18/60 0:04 -2.72++ 1...Nxh4 (58.847.598) 14577
18/60 0:05 -2.99++ 1...Nxh4 (80.000.512) 14861
18/62 0:07 -3.27 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (116.194.994) 14987
19/66 0:10 -3.43++ 1...Nxh4 (158.167.336) 15079
19/66 0:12 -3.51 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (196.444.412) 15126
20/66 0:14 -3.51 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (222.677.479) 15196
21/66 0:22 -3.68++ 1...Nxh4 (350.936.509) 15310
21/67 0:34 -4.03++ 1...Nxh4 (535.317.923) 15312
21/75 0:50 -4.06 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (768.109.865) 15337
22/75 1:04 -4.26++ 1...Nxh4 (989.298.656) 15356
22/75 1:16 -4.16 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (1.177.234.441) 15379
23/75 1:37 -4.36++ 1...Nxh4 (1.511.143.523) 15465
23/76 1:47 -4.36 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (1.660.527.262) 15485
Rybka
14.05 0:02 +0.11++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 4.b4 Rg1+
14.01 0:03 -0.29++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (1.738.527) 548
14.01 0:06 -1.09++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 4.c4 Rg1+ 5.Kh2 Rxf1 (3.409.014) 546
14.01 0:12 -1.84 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Re2 Rxh4 5.Qxh4 Qxh4+ (6.857.259) 552
15.01 0:15 -1.96++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Re2 Rxh4 (8.499.899) 565
15.01 0:15 -1.96 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (8.767.993) 566
16.01 0:18 -2.08++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (10.825.029) 586
16.01 0:22 -2.15 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Rg2 Rxh4 (13.608.027) 604
17.01 0:29 -2.27++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Rg2 Rxh4 (18.352.545) 626
17.01 0:36 -2.42++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (23.512.053) 643
17.01 0:46 -2.27 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (29.308.296) 631
18.01 0:50 -2.39++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (32.409.037) 637
18.01 1:01 -2.54++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (40.018.955) 648
18.01 1:06 -2.54++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (43.116.544) 649
Critter
15/45 0:01 -2.09++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (9.278.043) 5868
15/48 0:02 -1.98 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (12.693.332) 6318
16/48 0:02 -2.10++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (15.603.714) 6898
16/48 0:02 -2.22++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (18.395.188) 7375
16/48 0:02 -2.40++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (21.362.315) 7790
16/48 0:02 -2.33 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (22.991.002) 7846
17/48 0:03 -2.48++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (31.110.104) 8692
17/48 0:04 -2.62++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (39.277.488) 9172
17/50 0:04 -2.19-- 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (45.826.148) 9481
17/60 0:04 -2.04-- 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (46.142.084) 9455
17/63 0:05 -2.65 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (54.274.023) 9536
18/63 0:06 -2.65 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (63.379.695) 9890
19/63 0:09 -2.79 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (102.409.340) 10901
20/63 0:16 -2.96++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (189.106.051) 11773
20/63 0:22 -3.13++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (274.198.569) 12101
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res
The chess engines are real monsterskgburcham wrote:small hardwarejdart wrote:I used Houdini 1.5a, and it found this pretty quickly. Maybe 2.0 is slower on this position?How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it?
--Jon
[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -
Houdini
17/53 0:01 -1.95++ 1...Nxh4 (21.512.339) 14284
17/60 0:03 -2.58 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (49.667.690) 14455
18/60 0:04 -2.72++ 1...Nxh4 (58.847.598) 14577
18/60 0:05 -2.99++ 1...Nxh4 (80.000.512) 14861
18/62 0:07 -3.27 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (116.194.994) 14987
19/66 0:10 -3.43++ 1...Nxh4 (158.167.336) 15079
19/66 0:12 -3.51 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (196.444.412) 15126
20/66 0:14 -3.51 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (222.677.479) 15196
21/66 0:22 -3.68++ 1...Nxh4 (350.936.509) 15310
21/67 0:34 -4.03++ 1...Nxh4 (535.317.923) 15312
21/75 0:50 -4.06 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (768.109.865) 15337
22/75 1:04 -4.26++ 1...Nxh4 (989.298.656) 15356
22/75 1:16 -4.16 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (1.177.234.441) 15379
23/75 1:37 -4.36++ 1...Nxh4 (1.511.143.523) 15465
23/76 1:47 -4.36 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (1.660.527.262) 15485
Rybka
14.05 0:02 +0.11++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 4.b4 Rg1+
14.01 0:03 -0.29++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (1.738.527) 548
14.01 0:06 -1.09++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 4.c4 Rg1+ 5.Kh2 Rxf1 (3.409.014) 546
14.01 0:12 -1.84 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Re2 Rxh4 5.Qxh4 Qxh4+ (6.857.259) 552
15.01 0:15 -1.96++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Re2 Rxh4 (8.499.899) 565
15.01 0:15 -1.96 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (8.767.993) 566
16.01 0:18 -2.08++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (10.825.029) 586
16.01 0:22 -2.15 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Rg2 Rxh4 (13.608.027) 604
17.01 0:29 -2.27++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Rg2 Rxh4 (18.352.545) 626
17.01 0:36 -2.42++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (23.512.053) 643
17.01 0:46 -2.27 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (29.308.296) 631
18.01 0:50 -2.39++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (32.409.037) 637
18.01 1:01 -2.54++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (40.018.955) 648
18.01 1:06 -2.54++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (43.116.544) 649
Critter
15/45 0:01 -2.09++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (9.278.043) 5868
15/48 0:02 -1.98 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (12.693.332) 6318
16/48 0:02 -2.10++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (15.603.714) 6898
16/48 0:02 -2.22++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (18.395.188) 7375
16/48 0:02 -2.40++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (21.362.315) 7790
16/48 0:02 -2.33 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (22.991.002) 7846
17/48 0:03 -2.48++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (31.110.104) 8692
17/48 0:04 -2.62++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (39.277.488) 9172
17/50 0:04 -2.19-- 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (45.826.148) 9481
17/60 0:04 -2.04-- 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (46.142.084) 9455
17/63 0:05 -2.65 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (54.274.023) 9536
18/63 0:06 -2.65 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (63.379.695) 9890
19/63 0:09 -2.79 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (102.409.340) 10901
20/63 0:16 -2.96++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (189.106.051) 11773
20/63 0:22 -3.13++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (274.198.569) 12101
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….