Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Results

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

User avatar
ATOMICC
Posts: 150
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:50 pm
Location: USA

Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Results

Post by ATOMICC »

http://atomicc-testing.blogspot.com/201 ... c-hem.html
Happy chessing!
Top
User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

Post by gleperlier »

Thanks Brent :wink:
Top
jdart
Posts: 4366
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:23 am
Location: http://www.arasanchess.org

Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

Post by jdart »

from game 36:

[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -

Rg7 (as played) is good, but I think even better is Nxh4!

--Jon
Top
User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

Post by gleperlier »

jdart wrote:from game 36:

[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -

Rg7 (as played) is good, but I think even better is Nxh4!

--Jon
Indeed !


[D]r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - - 0 1

Analysis by HIARCS 13.2 MP:

1...Cxh4 2.gxh4 Tg4 3.Dh2 Df6 4.Fe2 Txh4 5.Fxh5 Txh2+
-+ (-2.27) Profondeur: 20/62 00:01:33 178mN
(Doe, 24.05.2012)
Top
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

jdart wrote:from game 36:

[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -

Rg7 (as played) is good, but I think even better is Nxh4!

--Jon
Absolutely....It wins the game in a fashionable way :D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
Top
User avatar
ATOMICC
Posts: 150
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:50 pm
Location: USA

Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

Post by ATOMICC »

jdart wrote:from game 36:

[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -

Rg7 (as played) is good, but I think even better is Nxh4!

--Jon
How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it? :)
Happy chessing!
Top
jdart
Posts: 4366
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:23 am
Location: http://www.arasanchess.org

Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

Post by jdart »

How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it?
I used Houdini 1.5a, and it found this pretty quickly. Maybe 2.0 is slower on this position?

--Jon
Top
User avatar
marcelk
Posts: 348
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 12:21 am

Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

Post by marcelk »

jdart wrote:
How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it?
I used Houdini 1.5a, and it found this pretty quickly. Maybe 2.0 is slower on this position?

--Jon
Very nice position, a very nice tactic! My program has a lot of trouble with it (on my laptop, 1 core:)

Code: Select all

  time ply  score variation
   1.6  13 -0.327 Ne7, Bb7 Rxg3, Bxa8 Rh3+, Kg2 Rxh4, Kg3 Ng6, Qe1 Rg4+, Kh3 Nxf4+, Kh2 e3, Rd1
   5.6  14 -0.206 Ne7, Qe1 Rg4, Rg2 Bf2, Qxf2 Rxa6, b3 Nxd5, Qd4 Ra5, b4 Rb5, Kg1
   7.9  15 -0.061 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Rg2 Rag8, c4 Ng6, Re2 Ne7, Rf3 Bd4, Ra3 Qf6, Kh2 Rg4
  11.4  16 +0.000 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Rg2 Rag8, c4 Ng6, Re2 Ne7, Rg2
  16.6  17 -0.088 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Bc4 Rag8, Rg2 Ng6, Rh2 Nxf4, gxf4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Rf2 Qg4+, Kf1
  21.1  18 +0.000 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Bc4 Rag8, Rg2 Ng6, Re2 Ne7, Rg2
  33.4  19 +0.000 Ne7, Qe1 Rg7, Bc4 Rag8, Rg2 Ng6, Re2 Ne7, Rg2
 277.3  20 +0.853 Rg7, Qe1 Rag8, c4 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Re2 Qg4+, Kf1 Qxh4, Nc3 Qh1+, Kf2 Qf3+, Ke1 e3, Kd1 h4
 317.3  21 +0.712 Rg7, Qe1 Rag8, c4 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Rg2 Qxh4, c5 Qf6, Kh1 Qd4, Nc3 Qxc5, Rg5 h4, Rxf5
 425.0  22 +0.771 Rg7, Qe1 Rag8, c4 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Rg2 Qxh4, c5 e3, Nc3 dxc5, Be2 Qd4, a4 h4, Kh2
 724.3  23 +0.946 Rg7, Qe1 Rag8, c4 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg1+, Rxg1 Rxg1+, Qxg1 Bxg1, Kxg1 Qxf4, Rg2 Qxh4, c5 e3, Nc3 dxc5, Be2 Qd4, a4 Kh6, Kh2 c4
 2606.4  24 +2.678 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg3, Qh2 Rag8, c4 Qf6, Bc8 R3g4, Bd7 Kh8, b4 Rxh4, b5 Rb8, c5 dxc5, Rg1 Rg8, b6 Rxh2+, Rxh2 Rxg1+, Kxg1 Qa1+, Kg2 Qxa2+, Kg3
 3318.3  25 +2.873 Nxh4, gxh4 Rg3, Qh2 Rag8, c4 Qf6, c5 R8g4, c6 Rxh4, Nc3 Bb6, a4 Kg6, Rg2 Rxg2, Qxh4 Qxh4+, Kxg2 Qg4+, Kh2 h4, Ne2 h3, Ng3 e3
Top
kgburcham
Posts: 2016
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:19 pm

Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

Post by kgburcham »

jdart wrote:
How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it?
I used Houdini 1.5a, and it found this pretty quickly. Maybe 2.0 is slower on this position?
--Jon
small hardware
[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -

Houdini

17/53 0:01 -1.95++ 1...Nxh4 (21.512.339) 14284
17/60 0:03 -2.58 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (49.667.690) 14455
18/60 0:04 -2.72++ 1...Nxh4 (58.847.598) 14577
18/60 0:05 -2.99++ 1...Nxh4 (80.000.512) 14861
18/62 0:07 -3.27 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (116.194.994) 14987
19/66 0:10 -3.43++ 1...Nxh4 (158.167.336) 15079
19/66 0:12 -3.51 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (196.444.412) 15126
20/66 0:14 -3.51 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (222.677.479) 15196
21/66 0:22 -3.68++ 1...Nxh4 (350.936.509) 15310
21/67 0:34 -4.03++ 1...Nxh4 (535.317.923) 15312
21/75 0:50 -4.06 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (768.109.865) 15337
22/75 1:04 -4.26++ 1...Nxh4 (989.298.656) 15356
22/75 1:16 -4.16 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (1.177.234.441) 15379
23/75 1:37 -4.36++ 1...Nxh4 (1.511.143.523) 15465
23/76 1:47 -4.36 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (1.660.527.262) 15485

Rybka

14.05 0:02 +0.11++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 4.b4 Rg1+
14.01 0:03 -0.29++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (1.738.527) 548
14.01 0:06 -1.09++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 4.c4 Rg1+ 5.Kh2 Rxf1 (3.409.014) 546
14.01 0:12 -1.84 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Re2 Rxh4 5.Qxh4 Qxh4+ (6.857.259) 552
15.01 0:15 -1.96++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Re2 Rxh4 (8.499.899) 565
15.01 0:15 -1.96 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (8.767.993) 566
16.01 0:18 -2.08++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (10.825.029) 586
16.01 0:22 -2.15 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Rg2 Rxh4 (13.608.027) 604
17.01 0:29 -2.27++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Rg2 Rxh4 (18.352.545) 626
17.01 0:36 -2.42++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (23.512.053) 643
17.01 0:46 -2.27 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (29.308.296) 631
18.01 0:50 -2.39++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (32.409.037) 637
18.01 1:01 -2.54++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (40.018.955) 648
18.01 1:06 -2.54++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (43.116.544) 649

Critter

15/45 0:01 -2.09++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (9.278.043) 5868
15/48 0:02 -1.98 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (12.693.332) 6318
16/48 0:02 -2.10++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (15.603.714) 6898
16/48 0:02 -2.22++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (18.395.188) 7375
16/48 0:02 -2.40++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (21.362.315) 7790
16/48 0:02 -2.33 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (22.991.002) 7846
17/48 0:03 -2.48++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (31.110.104) 8692
17/48 0:04 -2.62++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (39.277.488) 9172
17/50 0:04 -2.19-- 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (45.826.148) 9481
17/60 0:04 -2.04-- 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (46.142.084) 9455
17/63 0:05 -2.65 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (54.274.023) 9536
18/63 0:06 -2.65 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (63.379.695) 9890
19/63 0:09 -2.79 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (102.409.340) 10901
20/63 0:16 -2.96++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (189.106.051) 11773
20/63 0:22 -3.13++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (274.198.569) 12101
Top
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Res

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

kgburcham wrote:
jdart wrote:
How did you find that move, Jon? It's a good one. Which engine did you use and how much time did you give it?
I used Houdini 1.5a, and it found this pretty quickly. Maybe 2.0 is slower on this position?
--Jon
small hardware
[D] r5r1/b4p1k/B2p2nq/3P1p1p/N3pP1P/2P3P1/PP1RQ3/5R1K b - -

Houdini

17/53 0:01 -1.95++ 1...Nxh4 (21.512.339) 14284
17/60 0:03 -2.58 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (49.667.690) 14455
18/60 0:04 -2.72++ 1...Nxh4 (58.847.598) 14577
18/60 0:05 -2.99++ 1...Nxh4 (80.000.512) 14861
18/62 0:07 -3.27 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (116.194.994) 14987
19/66 0:10 -3.43++ 1...Nxh4 (158.167.336) 15079
19/66 0:12 -3.51 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (196.444.412) 15126
20/66 0:14 -3.51 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (222.677.479) 15196
21/66 0:22 -3.68++ 1...Nxh4 (350.936.509) 15310
21/67 0:34 -4.03++ 1...Nxh4 (535.317.923) 15312
21/75 0:50 -4.06 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (768.109.865) 15337
22/75 1:04 -4.26++ 1...Nxh4 (989.298.656) 15356
22/75 1:16 -4.16 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (1.177.234.441) 15379
23/75 1:37 -4.36++ 1...Nxh4 (1.511.143.523) 15465
23/76 1:47 -4.36 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (1.660.527.262) 15485

Rybka

14.05 0:02 +0.11++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 4.b4 Rg1+
14.01 0:03 -0.29++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (1.738.527) 548
14.01 0:06 -1.09++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 4.c4 Rg1+ 5.Kh2 Rxf1 (3.409.014) 546
14.01 0:12 -1.84 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Re2 Rxh4 5.Qxh4 Qxh4+ (6.857.259) 552
15.01 0:15 -1.96++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Re2 Rxh4 (8.499.899) 565
15.01 0:15 -1.96 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (8.767.993) 566
16.01 0:18 -2.08++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (10.825.029) 586
16.01 0:22 -2.15 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Rg2 Rxh4 (13.608.027) 604
17.01 0:29 -2.27++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Rg2 Rxh4 (18.352.545) 626
17.01 0:36 -2.42++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (23.512.053) 643
17.01 0:46 -2.27 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (29.308.296) 631
18.01 0:50 -2.39++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (32.409.037) 637
18.01 1:01 -2.54++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (40.018.955) 648
18.01 1:06 -2.54++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 4.Be2 Rxh4 (43.116.544) 649

Critter

15/45 0:01 -2.09++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (9.278.043) 5868
15/48 0:02 -1.98 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (12.693.332) 6318
16/48 0:02 -2.10++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (15.603.714) 6898
16/48 0:02 -2.22++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (18.395.188) 7375
16/48 0:02 -2.40++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (21.362.315) 7790
16/48 0:02 -2.33 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (22.991.002) 7846
17/48 0:03 -2.48++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (31.110.104) 8692
17/48 0:04 -2.62++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (39.277.488) 9172
17/50 0:04 -2.19-- 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (45.826.148) 9481
17/60 0:04 -2.04-- 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qh2 Qf6 (46.142.084) 9455
17/63 0:05 -2.65 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (54.274.023) 9536
18/63 0:06 -2.65 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (63.379.695) 9890
19/63 0:09 -2.79 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (102.409.340) 10901
20/63 0:16 -2.96++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (189.106.051) 11773
20/63 0:22 -3.13++ 1...Nxh4 2.gxh4 Rg4 3.Qe1 Rag8 (274.198.569) 12101
The chess engines are real monsters :shock:
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
Top

Return to “Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches”