Rybka 4 vs Houdini 1.02 - Long TC Match - LIVE BROADCAST

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: bob, hgm, Harvey Williamson

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Post Reply
Martin Thoresen
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:07 pm

Re: Rybka 4 vs Houdini 1.02 - Long TC Match - LIVE BROADCAST

Post by Martin Thoresen » Thu Jul 01, 2010 4:29 am

Hehe Tom, I have little control over this match while I am sleeping. :D

S.Taylor
Posts: 8348
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: Rybka 4 vs Houdini 1.02 - Long TC Match - LIVE BROADCAST

Post by S.Taylor » Thu Jul 01, 2010 1:59 pm

My internet was down for 6 days. Now i see that Rybka has a big lead.
If it's going like this till now, i don't expect Rybka will suddenly have problems.
To crush Rybka 4, it seems we must wait for a different program, or version.

gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: Rybka 4 vs Houdini 1.02 - Long TC Match - LIVE BROADCAST

Post by gerold » Thu Jul 01, 2010 2:47 pm

S.Taylor wrote:My internet was down for 6 days. Now i see that Rybka has a big lead.
If it's going like this till now, i don't expect Rybka will suddenly have problems.
To crush Rybka 4, it seems we must wait for a different program, or version.
This match is closer than a person may think. Look at all the
draw games.
Rybka use TB also . I don't think Houdini use TB.

Best,
Gerold.

Albert Silver
Posts: 2861
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Re: Rybka 4 vs Houdini 1.02 - Long TC Match - LIVE BROADCAST

Post by Albert Silver » Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:26 pm

gerold wrote:
S.Taylor wrote:My internet was down for 6 days. Now i see that Rybka has a big lead.
If it's going like this till now, i don't expect Rybka will suddenly have problems.
To crush Rybka 4, it seems we must wait for a different program, or version.
This match is closer than a person may think. Look at all the
draw games.
Rybka use TB also . I don't think Houdini use TB.

Best,
Gerold.
I guess crushing depends on what one's expectations are. So far, after 28 games, Rybka is performing at +50 Elo.
"Tactics are the bricks and sticks that make up a game, but positional play is the architectural blueprint."

Martin Thoresen
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:07 pm

the next match

Post by Martin Thoresen » Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:28 pm

For the next match I was thinking Houdini vs Stockfish.

BUT

A few choices I have which I can't decide on:

1: Keeping the same format
2: Using 2CPU and Ponder ON, with the same time controls
3: Using 2CPU and Ponder ON, with double the time controls

What do you think?

Also, I will double the hash size to 2048 MB.

Martin Thoresen
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:07 pm

Re: the next match

Post by Martin Thoresen » Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:49 pm

I got a few requests but forgot to add this:

Games 1-24 in a proper PGN format. Download here.

Albert Silver
Posts: 2861
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Re: the next match

Post by Albert Silver » Thu Jul 01, 2010 6:02 pm

Martin Thoresen wrote:For the next match I was thinking Houdini vs Stockfish.

BUT

A few choices I have which I can't decide on:

1: Keeping the same format
2: Using 2CPU and Ponder ON, with the same time controls
3: Using 2CPU and Ponder ON, with double the time controls

What do you think?

Also, I will double the hash size to 2048 MB.
If Stockfish is capable of gaining more from an i7 due to its use of threads, as opposed to cores, I'd like to see them with ponder off as here, to get a feel as to how much it really gains from the hyperthreading.

As to hash, give them as much as is practically possible with such a system. There is no question that both Rybka and Houdini are filling the 1GB within 30 seconds to a minute at most.
"Tactics are the bricks and sticks that make up a game, but positional play is the architectural blueprint."

Martin Thoresen
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:07 pm

Re: the next match

Post by Martin Thoresen » Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:46 pm

Albert Silver wrote: If Stockfish is capable of gaining more from an i7 due to its use of threads, as opposed to cores, I'd like to see them with ponder off as here, to get a feel as to how much it really gains from the hyperthreading.
Albert, I am not sure I understand you here. Hyperthreading is not enabled in my system and will not be. Feel free to elaborate a bit on your point. :D

Confused Regards,
Martin

S.Taylor
Posts: 8348
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: Rybka 4 vs Houdini 1.02 - Long TC Match - LIVE BROADCAST

Post by S.Taylor » Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:48 pm

Albert Silver wrote:
gerold wrote:
S.Taylor wrote:My internet was down for 6 days. Now i see that Rybka has a big lead.
If it's going like this till now, i don't expect Rybka will suddenly have problems.
To crush Rybka 4, it seems we must wait for a different program, or version.
This match is closer than a person may think. Look at all the
draw games.
Rybka use TB also . I don't think Houdini use TB.

Best,
Gerold.
I guess crushing depends on what one's expectations are. So far, after 28 games, Rybka is performing at +50 Elo.
You mean, between the two. But if they both played weaker programs, I wonder if Houdini would prove more dangerous vs them.

(crushing? first comes merely to win more than losing vs Rybka 4. Crushing would mean more than that, and this is obviously not available at the momment)
Last edited by S.Taylor on Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

S.Taylor
Posts: 8348
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:25 am
Location: Jerusalem Israel

Re: the next match

Post by S.Taylor » Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:52 pm

Martin Thoresen wrote:For the next match I was thinking Houdini vs Stockfish.
Obviously, you see what you see, and that makes you curious how they would do vs each other.
Ultimately, it would be interesting to see how soon something proves superior to Rybka.

Post Reply