Top Ten Tussle 2007 (new tournament)

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 41455
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Top Ten Tussle 2007 (new tournament)

Post by Graham Banks »

THE TOP TEN TUSSLE 2007

Athlon XP1900+
Fritz 10 GUI
128mb hash each
3-4-5 piece tablebases
Ponder off
HS-8moves.ctg book
40 moves in 68 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL)
4 cycles (36 rounds)


Participants

Rybka 2.3.2
Hiarcs 11.2
Toga II 1.3.4
Fruit 2.3
Zap!Chess Zanzibar
Loop 13.6
Fritz 10
Shredder 10
Naum 2.2
Strelka 1.8

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

The tournament can be followed and games downloaded from here:
http://kd.lab.nig.ac.jp/chess/discussio ... php?t=2459
Vinvin
Posts: 5228
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
Full name: Vincent Lejeune

Re: Top Ten Tussle 2007 (new tournament)

Post by Vinvin »

I'll follow this one closely (mainly because Hiarcs 11.2 and Naum 2.2)

Thanks, Graham ! :D
ernest
Posts: 2041
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:30 pm

Re: Top Ten Tussle 2007 (new tournament)

Post by ernest »

Graham Banks wrote: Participants

Rybka 2.3.2
....
Fruit 2.3
....
Hi Graham,

Why Rybka 2.3.2 and not the latest 2.3.2a or 2.3.2a mp (on 1 processor)?

Also, Ryan Benitez just corrected Fruit 2.3 into 2.3.1
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 41455
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Top Ten Tussle 2007 (new tournament)

Post by Graham Banks »

ernest wrote:
Graham Banks wrote: Participants

Rybka 2.3.2
....
Fruit 2.3
....
Hi Graham,

Why Rybka 2.3.2 and not the latest 2.3.2a or 2.3.2a mp (on 1 processor)?

Also, Ryan Benitez just corrected Fruit 2.3 into 2.3.1
I'm actually using Rybka 2.3.2a, but we refer to it as 2.3.2 on our lists.
Fruit 2.3.1 will replace Fruit 2.3.

Regards, Graham.
gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: Top Ten Tussle 2007 (new tournament)

Post by gerold »

Graham Banks wrote:
ernest wrote:
Graham Banks wrote: Participants

Rybka 2.3.2
....
Fruit 2.3
....
Hi Graham,

Why Rybka 2.3.2 and not the latest 2.3.2a or 2.3.2a mp (on 1 processor)?

Also, Ryan Benitez just corrected Fruit 2.3 into 2.3.1
I'm actually using Rybka 2.3.2a, but we refer to it as 2.3.2 on our lists.
Fruit 2.3.1 will replace Fruit 2.3.

Regards, Graham.
Thanks for running this one Graham. It will be very interesting to
see how they place.

Good luck,

Gerold.